You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The auto-fill-parameters feature was moved behind an experiment but not added to the list of safe experiments. A customer recently came to us asking to bring the feature back.
It's not a breaking, dangerous, or incomplete feature -- It just wasn't demanded unanimously. We should mark it as safe.
We need to add it here. Tracking this as an issue for triage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The issue that led to its revert was that template admins want users to set some parameters from scratch each time. I imagine a disk size parameter as a good example of that. Users don't really care if they use a lot of disk so template admins want them to affirmatively request it each time. If someone has more examples it would be good to hear them.
It would be nice to release this feature properly in some way that's not an obscure feature flag so users can actually benefit from it. I understand @code-asher is investigating the parameter system holistically, perhaps this is a good place to start.
The
auto-fill-parameters
feature was moved behind an experiment but not added to the list of safe experiments. A customer recently came to us asking to bring the feature back.It's not a breaking, dangerous, or incomplete feature -- It just wasn't demanded unanimously. We should mark it as safe.
We need to add it here. Tracking this as an issue for triage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: