-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 894
feat: show banner when workspace is outdated #4926
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 2 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ | ||
package cli | ||
|
||
import ( | ||
"net/url" | ||
"testing" | ||
|
||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" | ||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require" | ||
|
||
"github.com/coder/coder/codersdk" | ||
) | ||
|
||
const ( | ||
fakeOwnerName = "fake-owner-name" | ||
fakeServerURL = "https://fake-foo-url" | ||
fakeWorkspaceName = "fake-workspace-name" | ||
) | ||
|
||
func TestVerifyWorkspaceOutdated(t *testing.T) { | ||
t.Parallel() | ||
|
||
serverURL, err := url.Parse(fakeServerURL) | ||
require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
||
client := codersdk.Client{URL: serverURL} | ||
|
||
t.Run("Up-to-date", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sorry, I didn't look too closely at these tests on my first pass. I should point out that the preferred way to test in the With these types of tests, we'd do a bit more setup for the test so that we can then test the output of running (Not a blocker for this PR, but just a heads up for future PRs.) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ok, I see now. I can use existing coderdtest APIs. I need to create a workspace to simulate a template update ( I can adjust the implementation, but not sure if in this case the internal_test isn't just simpler (and shorter). Do you have any preference? |
||
t.Parallel() | ||
|
||
workspace := codersdk.Workspace{Name: fakeWorkspaceName, OwnerName: fakeOwnerName} | ||
|
||
_, outdated := verifyWorkspaceOutdated(&client, workspace) | ||
|
||
assert.False(t, outdated, "workspace should be up-to-date") | ||
}) | ||
t.Run("Outdated", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
t.Parallel() | ||
|
||
workspace := codersdk.Workspace{Name: fakeWorkspaceName, OwnerName: fakeOwnerName, Outdated: true} | ||
|
||
updateWorkspaceBanner, outdated := verifyWorkspaceOutdated(&client, workspace) | ||
|
||
assert.True(t, outdated, "workspace should be outdated") | ||
assert.NotEmpty(t, updateWorkspaceBanner, "workspace banner should be present") | ||
}) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func TestBuildWorkspaceLink(t *testing.T) { | ||
t.Parallel() | ||
|
||
serverURL, err := url.Parse(fakeServerURL) | ||
require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
||
workspace := codersdk.Workspace{Name: fakeWorkspaceName, OwnerName: fakeOwnerName} | ||
workspaceLink := buildWorkspaceLink(serverURL, workspace) | ||
|
||
assert.Equal(t, workspaceLink.String(), fakeServerURL+"/@"+fakeOwnerName+"/"+fakeWorkspaceName) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, this tty check is only for
stdout
which doesn't help us (we want to confirm stderr.)Made the following quick test:
Using:
Arguably, this is a bug we potentially have across our whole CLI, but for now I think we can just add a new function:
isTTYErr
.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the snippet. I refactored the original
isTTYOut
function, but please let me know what you think.