fix: fix CI concurrency #9088
Merged
fix: fix CI concurrency #9088
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mafredri
reviewed
Aug 14, 2023
.github/workflows/ci.yaml
Outdated
| @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ permissions: | |||
| # additional changes | |||
| concurrency: | |||
| group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.ref }} | |||
| cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request' }} | |||
| cancel-in-progress: ${{ github.event_name == 'push' }} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Will this cancel pushes on the main branch too? I would expect us to want all pushes to be fully tested there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes you are right. It will also cancel on main. May be we should revert #9017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mafredri Or I can update the condition to ignore main
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes concurrency issues which was inadvertently introduced in #9017