Skip to content

chore: update .pre-commit-config.yaml #198

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Nov 14, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the pre-commit hook configuration to version v0.9.2 for improved code quality checks.
    • Clarified comments in the README to enhance understanding of hook requirements and configurations.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 14, 2024
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2024 09:05
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 14, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on updating the .pre-commit-config.yaml file and the README.rst file. The version of the commit-check repository is upgraded from v0.9.1 to v0.9.2. The check-merge-base hook is now commented out with a note about its requirement for downloading all history. Additionally, the README.rst file has been modified to enhance clarity regarding the prerequisites for the hooks.

Changes

File Change Summary
.pre-commit-config.yaml Updated commit-check version from v0.9.1 to v0.9.2; modified comment for check-merge-base hook.
README.rst Clarified comments regarding check-message and check-merge-base hooks for better readability.

Possibly related PRs

  • chore: update .pre-commit-config.yaml #198: The changes in this PR directly update the .pre-commit-config.yaml file, including the same version update and commenting on the check-merge-base hook, which aligns with the modifications made in the main PR.

🐇 In the meadow, hops a little hare,
With hooks and checks, we show we care.
A version bump, a merge base too,
Pre-commit magic, all shiny and new!
Let's code with joy, let errors be few! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 14, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.27%. Comparing base (166b751) to head (42e677b).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #198   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.27%   97.27%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         294      294           
=======================================
  Hits          286      286           
  Misses          8        8           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.rst (1)

78-78: Improve grammar in the prerequisite note.

While the added prerequisite information is valuable, the grammar could be improved for better clarity.

Consider this revision:

-        -   id: check-merge-base # requires download all history
+        -   id: check-merge-base # requires downloading all history
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df5b7c6 and aecb03d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
  • README.rst (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.rst (1)

73-73: LGTM! Text improvement is clear and accurate.

The simplified phrasing maintains clarity while being more concise.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title cchore: update .pre-commit-config.yaml chore: update .pre-commit-config.yaml Nov 14, 2024
Copy link

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit 82612aa into main Nov 14, 2024
5 checks passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the shenxianpeng-patch-1 branch November 14, 2024 18:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants