Skip to content

feat: update noxfile.py and readme #201

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

feat: update noxfile.py and readme #201

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Nov 25, 2024

closes #181 #190

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Enhanced clarity and structure of the README.rst file, improving user understanding of the Commit Check tool and its configuration.
    • Added a new failure check for commit signatures and standardized error message formatting.
  • New Features

    • Introduced a new docs-live session in the Nox configuration for live documentation updates.
  • Chores

    • Updated the requirements-dev.txt to reference a specific Git repository for the nox dependency.
    • Simplified the workflow configuration to streamline dependency installation and task execution using nox.

…heck/noxfile.py:

* lint
- test-hook
- build
- install-wheel
- commit-check
- coverage
- docs

sessions marked with * are selected, sessions marked with - are skipped.
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Nov 25, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications across four files: README.rst, noxfile.py, requirements-dev.txt, and .github/workflows/main.yml. The README.rst file has been updated for clarity, particularly regarding the Commit Check tool's features and usage instructions. The noxfile.py has seen changes in session definitions and installation commands, including the addition of a new session for live documentation updates. The requirements-dev.txt file now points to a specific GitHub repository for the nox dependency, ensuring a consistent development environment. Additionally, the workflow configuration has been streamlined to rely more on nox for various tasks.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.rst Enhanced clarity and structure; streamlined Commit Check tool description; updated configuration instructions; clarified usage as GitHub Action and pre-commit hook; renamed "Example" to "Examples"; added failure check for commit signatures; standardized error message formatting.
noxfile.py Removed reuse_venv option; updated lint session to run pre-commit --all-files; simplified docs session installation command; added docs-live session for live documentation updates.
requirements-dev.txt Updated nox dependency to a specific GitHub repository reference, replacing the plain nox entry.
.github/workflows/main.yml Simplified installation of dependencies; transitioned to using nox for linting, testing, building, and coverage collection tasks; streamlined installation of wheel artifacts.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Add Examples (#[181])

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: support new pre-commit hook check-merge-base #197: The changes in this PR introduce a new pre-commit hook check-merge-base, which is directly referenced in the main PR's updates to the README.rst, enhancing the functionality of the commit-check tool.
  • chore: update .pre-commit-config.yaml #198: This PR updates the .pre-commit-config.yaml file to include comments about the check-merge-base hook, which aligns with the modifications made in the main PR regarding the documentation of this hook in README.rst.

Suggested labels

enhancement

🐇 In the garden of code, I hop with glee,
Changes to README, as clear as can be!
Nox sessions now lively, with docs on the run,
A GitHub link shines bright, oh what fun!
With each little tweak, our tool's set to grow,
Hopping through updates, watch us steal the show! 🌼

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@shenxianpeng has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6cf8f8 and e751716.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 25, 2024

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.27%. Comparing base (1d194eb) to head (2e2ba14).

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #201   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.27%   97.27%           
=======================================
  Files           7        7           
  Lines         294      294           
=======================================
  Hits          286      286           
  Misses          8        8           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng marked this pull request as ready for review November 26, 2024 13:26
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title fix noxfile.py and update readme (WIP) fix noxfile.py and update readme Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
requirements-dev.txt (1)

Line range hint 1-6: Consider adding version constraints for all dependencies

None of the dependencies have version constraints specified, which could lead to compatibility issues if breaking changes are introduced in future versions.

Consider adding version constraints for all dependencies:

-coverage
+coverage>=7.3.2
-git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@main
+git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@{specific-commit-hash}
-pre-commit
+pre-commit>=3.5.0
-pytest
+pytest>=7.4.3
-pytest-mock
+pytest-mock>=3.12.0
noxfile.py (3)

68-71: Consider keeping editable mode installation for docs session

The change from session.install("-e", ".") to session.install(".") removes editable mode installation. While this matches production better, it may slow down documentation development as changes to source won't be immediately reflected without reinstallation.

Consider reverting to editable mode installation:

-    session.install(".")
+    session.install("-e", ".")

73-77: Excellent addition of live documentation preview, but needs some enhancements

The new docs-live session with sphinx-autobuild is a great addition for improving the documentation development workflow. However, consider enhancing it with:

  1. Error handling for sphinx-autobuild failures
  2. Configurable port option
  3. Host configuration for network access

Consider this enhanced implementation:

 @nox.session(name="docs-live")
 def docs_live(session):
+    port = session.posargs[0] if session.posargs else "8000"
     session.install(".")
     session.install("-r", REQUIREMENTS["docs"], "sphinx-autobuild")
-    session.run("sphinx-autobuild", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html")
+    try:
+        session.run(
+            "sphinx-autobuild",
+            "-b", "html",
+            "--host", "0.0.0.0",
+            "--port", port,
+            "docs",
+            "_build/html"
+        )
+    except Exception as e:
+        session.error(f"Failed to start documentation server: {e}")

68-77: Consider centralizing build directory configuration

The _build/html directory is hardcoded in both docs sessions. Consider moving this to a configuration variable at the top of the file for better maintainability.

 import nox
 import glob
 
+DOCS_BUILD_DIR = "_build/html"
+
 nox.options.reuse_existing_virtualenvs = True
 nox.options.sessions = ["lint"]

Then update the docs sessions to use this variable:

 @nox.session()
 def docs(session):
     session.install(".")
     session.install("-r", REQUIREMENTS["docs"])
-    session.run("sphinx-build", "-E", "-W", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html")
+    session.run("sphinx-build", "-E", "-W", "-b", "html", "docs", DOCS_BUILD_DIR)

 @nox.session(name="docs-live")
 def docs_live(session):
     session.install(".")
     session.install("-r", REQUIREMENTS["docs"], "sphinx-autobuild")
-    session.run("sphinx-autobuild", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html")
+    session.run("sphinx-autobuild", "-b", "html", "docs", DOCS_BUILD_DIR)
README.rst (3)

33-37: Consider being more specific about additional features.

Instead of using "and more" in the tool description, consider explicitly listing all the key features. This helps users better understand the full capabilities of the tool upfront.

-**Commit Check** is a free, powerful tool that enforces commit metadata standards, including commit message, branch naming, committer name/email, commit signoff and more.
+**Commit Check** is a free, powerful tool that enforces commit metadata standards, including commit message, branch naming, committer name/email, commit signoff, merge base validation, and author verification.

85-103: Consider adding version pinning recommendation.

While the installation instructions are clear, consider adding a note about version pinning for production use. This helps ensure reproducible installations across different environments.

 Install globally

 .. code-block:: bash

     sudo pip3 install -U commit-check
+
+.. tip::
+
+    For production use, consider pinning the version:
+    ``sudo pip3 install commit-check==X.Y.Z``

Line range hint 123-198: Consider using reStructuredText substitution for repeated ASCII art.

The ASCII art error banner is repeated multiple times in the examples. Consider using reStructuredText substitution to make it more maintainable.

+.. |error_banner| replace:: |
+    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)
+    / ._. \      / ._. \      / ._. \      / ._. \      / ._. \
+    __\( C )/__  __\( H )/__  __\( E )/__  __\( C )/__  __\( K )/__
+    (_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)
+    || E ||      || R ||      || R ||      || O ||      || R ||
+    _.' '-' '._  _.' '-' '._  _.' '-' '._  _.' '-' '._  _.' '-' '._
+    (.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)
+    `-´     `-´  `-´     `-´  `-´     `-´  `-´     `-´  `-´     `-´
+
 Examples
 --------
 
 Check Commit Message Failed
 
 .. code-block:: text
 
     Commit rejected by Commit-Check.
-
-    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)    (c).-.(c)
-    ...
+    |error_banner|
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1d194eb and 2e2ba14.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.rst (5 hunks)
  • noxfile.py (1 hunks)
  • requirements-dev.txt (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
requirements-dev.txt (1)

2-2: ⚠️ Potential issue

Consider pinning to a specific commit hash instead of main branch

Using a direct Git reference to the main branch could lead to reproducibility issues as the branch can change unexpectedly. Additionally, this approach may have security implications as the content of the main branch could be modified without notice.

Let's verify the repository's status and latest stable commit:

Consider updating to use a specific commit hash:

-git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@main
+git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@{specific-commit-hash}
✅ Verification successful

Consider using the latest release tag instead of main branch

The repository is actively maintained with the latest release 2024.10.09 published on October 9, 2024, and recent commits as of November 25, 2024. Instead of using the unstable main branch, consider updating to use the latest release tag:

-git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@main
+git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@2024.10.09

This will ensure build reproducibility while still using a stable, tested version from a maintained repository.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the repository status and latest release
# Check if the repository exists and is maintained
gh repo view wntrblm/nox --json updatedAt,isArchived,defaultBranch,latestRelease

# Get the latest commit hash from main branch
gh api repos/wntrblm/nox/commits/main --jq '.sha'

Length of output: 1317


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the repository is actively maintained and its latest release
gh repo view wntrblm/nox --json updatedAt,isArchived,latestRelease,pushedAt

# Let's also check the noxfile.py to understand why this specific fork is needed
fd noxfile.py --exec cat {}

# Check if there are any issues or discussions mentioning why this fork is used
rg -l "wntrblm/nox" -g "!requirements*.txt"

Length of output: 2513

README.rst (2)

75-75: LGTM! Clear documentation of available hooks.

The hooks are well-documented with their specific requirements clearly stated.


Line range hint 1-200: Well-structured and comprehensive documentation!

The README provides clear instructions, good examples, and covers all major features. The documentation structure makes it easy for users to find relevant information.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title fix noxfile.py and update readme fix: update noxfile.py and readme Nov 26, 2024
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title fix: update noxfile.py and readme feat: update noxfile.py and readme Nov 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml (1)

Line range hint 24-87: Consider documenting nox sessions

The workflow heavily relies on nox sessions. Consider adding a section in the README that documents each nox session's purpose and configuration for better maintainability.

Would you like me to help create a documentation template for the nox sessions?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e2ba14 and e6cf8f8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/main.yml (6)

28-29: LGTM! Good separation of concerns

The separation of linting and hook testing into distinct nox sessions provides better granularity and control.


32-32: LGTM! Good workflow organization

The build and commit-check steps are well organized with proper artifact handling between them.

Also applies to: 39-39


74-74: LGTM! Good cross-platform compatibility

The install test properly handles cross-platform wheel installation with comprehensive Python version coverage.


42-43: LGTM! Verify coverage configuration

The coverage collection is properly integrated with Codecov.

✅ Verification successful

Coverage configuration is properly implemented

The coverage session in noxfile.py is correctly configured to:

  • Run tests with coverage using pytest
  • Generate coverage report
  • Export coverage data to XML format for Codecov integration
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check coverage configuration in noxfile.py
ast-grep --pattern 'def coverage($$$):
  $$$
  run($$$)
  $$$'

Length of output: 64


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the noxfile.py first
fd noxfile.py

# Then check its content
cat $(fd noxfile.py)

# Also check for any coverage related configuration files
fd -e toml -e ini -e yml -e yaml -e cfg -e conf | grep -i coverage

Length of output: 2235


86-87: Verify nox session with working directory

The working-directory setting might affect how nox finds its configuration file. Consider moving this setting to the nox session itself.


24-24: Verify development dependencies are included

The simplified installation using requirements.txt might miss development dependencies needed for testing and other CI tasks.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/main.yml (3)

24-24: Consider optimizing dependency installation and session execution.

The workflow could benefit from the following improvements:

  1. Consider caching pip dependencies to speed up builds
  2. Add session version pinning for consistency
  3. Consider combining lint and test-hook sessions to reduce execution time
      - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
        with:
          python-version: '3.x'
+     - uses: actions/cache@v3
+       with:
+         path: ~/.cache/pip
+         key: ${{ runner.os }}-pip-${{ hashFiles('requirements-dev.txt') }}
+         restore-keys: |
+           ${{ runner.os }}-pip-
      - run: pip install -r requirements-dev.txt

      - name: Run pre-commit
-       run: |
-         nox -s lint
-         nox -s test-hook
+       run: nox -s lint test-hook -- -r 0

Also applies to: 28-29


42-43: Consider log verbosity in CI environment.

The coverage collection looks good, but consider the following for the codecov step:

  1. The verbose flag might generate excessive logs in CI
  2. Consider adding a retry mechanism for codecov uploads
      - uses: codecov/codecov-action@v5.0.2
        with:
          token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}
          files: ./coverage.xml
          fail_ci_if_error: true
-         verbose: true
+         verbose: false

83-83: Optimize documentation build with caching.

The documentation build step could be optimized with caching to speed up builds.

        - uses: actions/setup-python@v5
          with:
            python-version: "3.10"
+       - uses: actions/cache@v3
+         with:
+           path: |
+             ~/.cache/pip
+             docs/_build
+           key: ${{ runner.os }}-docs-${{ hashFiles('requirements-dev.txt') }}
+           restore-keys: |
+             ${{ runner.os }}-docs-
        - run: pip install -r requirements-dev.txt

Also applies to: 86-86

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e6cf8f8 and e751716.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/main.yml (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/main.yml (2)

74-74: LGTM! Cross-platform installation test is well configured.

The installation test properly handles:

  1. Multiple Python versions (3.8-3.13)
  2. Cross-platform testing (Windows, Ubuntu, macOS)
  3. Shell compatibility for Windows

32-32: Add error handling and dependency verification.

The build and commit-check steps should ensure proper error handling and dependency verification.

Let's verify the nox sessions and their dependencies:

Also applies to: 39-39

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Examples
2 participants