-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
feat: update noxfile.py and readme #201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…heck/noxfile.py: * lint - test-hook - build - install-wheel - commit-check - coverage - docs sessions marked with * are selected, sessions marked with - are skipped.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across four files: Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Warning Rate limit exceeded@shenxianpeng has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 46 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #201 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.27% 97.27%
=======================================
Files 7 7
Lines 294 294
=======================================
Hits 286 286
Misses 8 8 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
requirements-dev.txt (1)
Line range hint
1-6
: Consider adding version constraints for all dependenciesNone of the dependencies have version constraints specified, which could lead to compatibility issues if breaking changes are introduced in future versions.
Consider adding version constraints for all dependencies:
-coverage +coverage>=7.3.2 -git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@main +git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@{specific-commit-hash} -pre-commit +pre-commit>=3.5.0 -pytest +pytest>=7.4.3 -pytest-mock +pytest-mock>=3.12.0noxfile.py (3)
68-71
: Consider keeping editable mode installation for docs sessionThe change from
session.install("-e", ".")
tosession.install(".")
removes editable mode installation. While this matches production better, it may slow down documentation development as changes to source won't be immediately reflected without reinstallation.Consider reverting to editable mode installation:
- session.install(".") + session.install("-e", ".")
73-77
: Excellent addition of live documentation preview, but needs some enhancementsThe new
docs-live
session withsphinx-autobuild
is a great addition for improving the documentation development workflow. However, consider enhancing it with:
- Error handling for sphinx-autobuild failures
- Configurable port option
- Host configuration for network access
Consider this enhanced implementation:
@nox.session(name="docs-live") def docs_live(session): + port = session.posargs[0] if session.posargs else "8000" session.install(".") session.install("-r", REQUIREMENTS["docs"], "sphinx-autobuild") - session.run("sphinx-autobuild", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html") + try: + session.run( + "sphinx-autobuild", + "-b", "html", + "--host", "0.0.0.0", + "--port", port, + "docs", + "_build/html" + ) + except Exception as e: + session.error(f"Failed to start documentation server: {e}")
68-77
: Consider centralizing build directory configurationThe
_build/html
directory is hardcoded in both docs sessions. Consider moving this to a configuration variable at the top of the file for better maintainability.import nox import glob +DOCS_BUILD_DIR = "_build/html" + nox.options.reuse_existing_virtualenvs = True nox.options.sessions = ["lint"]Then update the docs sessions to use this variable:
@nox.session() def docs(session): session.install(".") session.install("-r", REQUIREMENTS["docs"]) - session.run("sphinx-build", "-E", "-W", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html") + session.run("sphinx-build", "-E", "-W", "-b", "html", "docs", DOCS_BUILD_DIR) @nox.session(name="docs-live") def docs_live(session): session.install(".") session.install("-r", REQUIREMENTS["docs"], "sphinx-autobuild") - session.run("sphinx-autobuild", "-b", "html", "docs", "_build/html") + session.run("sphinx-autobuild", "-b", "html", "docs", DOCS_BUILD_DIR)README.rst (3)
33-37
: Consider being more specific about additional features.Instead of using "and more" in the tool description, consider explicitly listing all the key features. This helps users better understand the full capabilities of the tool upfront.
-**Commit Check** is a free, powerful tool that enforces commit metadata standards, including commit message, branch naming, committer name/email, commit signoff and more. +**Commit Check** is a free, powerful tool that enforces commit metadata standards, including commit message, branch naming, committer name/email, commit signoff, merge base validation, and author verification.
85-103
: Consider adding version pinning recommendation.While the installation instructions are clear, consider adding a note about version pinning for production use. This helps ensure reproducible installations across different environments.
Install globally .. code-block:: bash sudo pip3 install -U commit-check + +.. tip:: + + For production use, consider pinning the version: + ``sudo pip3 install commit-check==X.Y.Z``
Line range hint
123-198
: Consider using reStructuredText substitution for repeated ASCII art.The ASCII art error banner is repeated multiple times in the examples. Consider using reStructuredText substitution to make it more maintainable.
+.. |error_banner| replace:: | + (c).-.(c) (c).-.(c) (c).-.(c) (c).-.(c) (c).-.(c) + / ._. \ / ._. \ / ._. \ / ._. \ / ._. \ + __\( C )/__ __\( H )/__ __\( E )/__ __\( C )/__ __\( K )/__ + (_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._)(_.-/'-'\-._) + || E || || R || || R || || O || || R || + _.' '-' '._ _.' '-' '._ _.' '-' '._ _.' '-' '._ _.' '-' '._ + (.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.)(.-./`-´\.-.) + `-´ `-´ `-´ `-´ `-´ `-´ `-´ `-´ `-´ `-´ + Examples -------- Check Commit Message Failed .. code-block:: text Commit rejected by Commit-Check. - - (c).-.(c) (c).-.(c) (c).-.(c) (c).-.(c) (c).-.(c) - ... + |error_banner|
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
README.rst
(5 hunks)noxfile.py
(1 hunks)requirements-dev.txt
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
requirements-dev.txt (1)
2-2
:
Consider pinning to a specific commit hash instead of main branch
Using a direct Git reference to the main
branch could lead to reproducibility issues as the branch can change unexpectedly. Additionally, this approach may have security implications as the content of the main branch could be modified without notice.
Let's verify the repository's status and latest stable commit:
Consider updating to use a specific commit hash:
-git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@main
+git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@{specific-commit-hash}
✅ Verification successful
Consider using the latest release tag instead of main branch
The repository is actively maintained with the latest release 2024.10.09
published on October 9, 2024, and recent commits as of November 25, 2024. Instead of using the unstable main
branch, consider updating to use the latest release tag:
-git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@main
+git+https://github.com/wntrblm/nox.git@2024.10.09
This will ensure build reproducibility while still using a stable, tested version from a maintained repository.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the repository status and latest release
# Check if the repository exists and is maintained
gh repo view wntrblm/nox --json updatedAt,isArchived,defaultBranch,latestRelease
# Get the latest commit hash from main branch
gh api repos/wntrblm/nox/commits/main --jq '.sha'
Length of output: 1317
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if the repository is actively maintained and its latest release
gh repo view wntrblm/nox --json updatedAt,isArchived,latestRelease,pushedAt
# Let's also check the noxfile.py to understand why this specific fork is needed
fd noxfile.py --exec cat {}
# Check if there are any issues or discussions mentioning why this fork is used
rg -l "wntrblm/nox" -g "!requirements*.txt"
Length of output: 2513
README.rst (2)
75-75
: LGTM! Clear documentation of available hooks.
The hooks are well-documented with their specific requirements clearly stated.
Line range hint 1-200
: Well-structured and comprehensive documentation!
The README provides clear instructions, good examples, and covers all major features. The documentation structure makes it easy for users to find relevant information.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml (1)
Line range hint
24-87
: Consider documenting nox sessionsThe workflow heavily relies on nox sessions. Consider adding a section in the README that documents each nox session's purpose and configuration for better maintainability.
Would you like me to help create a documentation template for the nox sessions?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/main.yml (6)
28-29
: LGTM! Good separation of concerns
The separation of linting and hook testing into distinct nox sessions provides better granularity and control.
32-32
: LGTM! Good workflow organization
The build and commit-check steps are well organized with proper artifact handling between them.
Also applies to: 39-39
74-74
: LGTM! Good cross-platform compatibility
The install test properly handles cross-platform wheel installation with comprehensive Python version coverage.
42-43
: LGTM! Verify coverage configuration
The coverage collection is properly integrated with Codecov.
✅ Verification successful
Coverage configuration is properly implemented
The coverage session in noxfile.py is correctly configured to:
- Run tests with coverage using pytest
- Generate coverage report
- Export coverage data to XML format for Codecov integration
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check coverage configuration in noxfile.py
ast-grep --pattern 'def coverage($$$):
$$$
run($$$)
$$$'
Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the noxfile.py first
fd noxfile.py
# Then check its content
cat $(fd noxfile.py)
# Also check for any coverage related configuration files
fd -e toml -e ini -e yml -e yaml -e cfg -e conf | grep -i coverage
Length of output: 2235
86-87
: Verify nox session with working directory
The working-directory
setting might affect how nox finds its configuration file. Consider moving this setting to the nox session itself.
24-24
: Verify development dependencies are included
The simplified installation using requirements.txt
might miss development dependencies needed for testing and other CI tasks.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/main.yml (3)
24-24
: Consider optimizing dependency installation and session execution.The workflow could benefit from the following improvements:
- Consider caching pip dependencies to speed up builds
- Add session version pinning for consistency
- Consider combining lint and test-hook sessions to reduce execution time
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5 with: python-version: '3.x' + - uses: actions/cache@v3 + with: + path: ~/.cache/pip + key: ${{ runner.os }}-pip-${{ hashFiles('requirements-dev.txt') }} + restore-keys: | + ${{ runner.os }}-pip- - run: pip install -r requirements-dev.txt - name: Run pre-commit - run: | - nox -s lint - nox -s test-hook + run: nox -s lint test-hook -- -r 0Also applies to: 28-29
42-43
: Consider log verbosity in CI environment.The coverage collection looks good, but consider the following for the codecov step:
- The verbose flag might generate excessive logs in CI
- Consider adding a retry mechanism for codecov uploads
- uses: codecov/codecov-action@v5.0.2 with: token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }} files: ./coverage.xml fail_ci_if_error: true - verbose: true + verbose: false
83-83
: Optimize documentation build with caching.The documentation build step could be optimized with caching to speed up builds.
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5 with: python-version: "3.10" + - uses: actions/cache@v3 + with: + path: | + ~/.cache/pip + docs/_build + key: ${{ runner.os }}-docs-${{ hashFiles('requirements-dev.txt') }} + restore-keys: | + ${{ runner.os }}-docs- - run: pip install -r requirements-dev.txtAlso applies to: 86-86
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/main.yml
(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/main.yml (2)
74-74
: LGTM! Cross-platform installation test is well configured.
The installation test properly handles:
- Multiple Python versions (3.8-3.13)
- Cross-platform testing (Windows, Ubuntu, macOS)
- Shell compatibility for Windows
32-32
: Add error handling and dependency verification.
The build and commit-check steps should ensure proper error handling and dependency verification.
Let's verify the nox sessions and their dependencies:
Also applies to: 39-39
closes #181 #190
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
README.rst
file, improving user understanding of the Commit Check tool and its configuration.New Features
docs-live
session in the Nox configuration for live documentation updates.Chores
requirements-dev.txt
to reference a specific Git repository for thenox
dependency.nox
.