Skip to content

test: add more tests and update pre-commit hook to ruff #211

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Jan 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Linting

    • Replaced Flake8 with Ruff linter for improved code quality checks
  • Testing

    • Added new test cases for merge base validation with empty regex
    • Added new test case for commit message check when no commit message file is provided
    • Added new test case for error handling when unable to access a specified directory
    • Added code coverage exclusion markers for specific function calls
  • Maintenance

    • Updated pre-commit configuration to use a more modern linting tool
    • Ensured development requirements are installed before running coverage tests

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 28, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 28, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces changes to the project's linting configuration and test coverage. The primary modification is replacing the Flake8 linter with Ruff in the .pre-commit-config.yaml file. Additionally, # pragma: no cover comments were added to specific function calls in branch and commit check modules to exclude them from code coverage analysis. New test methods were also added to various test files to improve test coverage for specific functionalities.

Changes

File Change Summary
.pre-commit-config.yaml Replaced Flake8 linter with Ruff, adding new repository and hook configuration
commit_check/branch.py Added # pragma: no cover comment to print_error_header() function calls
commit_check/commit.py Added # pragma: no cover comment to print_error_header() function calls
tests/branch_test.py Added new test method test_check_merge_base_with_empty_regex to TestCheckMergeBase class
tests/commit_test.py Added new test function test_check_commit_msg_no_commit_msg_file
tests/error_test.py Added new test function test_error_handler_cannot_access
noxfile.py Modified coverage session to install development requirements

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant PreCommit as Pre-commit
    participant Linter as Ruff Linter
    
    PreCommit->>Linter: Run linter in fix mode
    Linter-->>PreCommit: Return linting results
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's ode to code's new might,
Ruff replaces Flake8's light,
Coverage comments sneak their way,
Testing paths now brighter today,
Hop along, code clean and bright! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d473eb7 and 600d2f6.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
  • commit_check/commit.py (2 hunks)
  • noxfile.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/commit_test.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/error_test.py (1 hunks)
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 28, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (0032ba0) to head (600d2f6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #211      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   97.27%   100.00%   +2.72%     
===========================================
  Files           7         7              
  Lines         294       290       -4     
===========================================
+ Hits          286       290       +4     
+ Misses          8         0       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0032ba0 and d473eb7.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)
  • commit_check/branch.py (2 hunks)
  • commit_check/commit.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/branch_test.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • commit_check/branch.py
  • commit_check/commit.py
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/branch_test.py (1)

126-134: Well-structured test case!

The new test case complements the existing empty checks test and follows the established testing patterns. It effectively verifies the behavior when an empty regex is provided.

Copy link

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit 91ee12b into main Jan 28, 2025
26 of 27 checks passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the add-tests branch January 28, 2025 10:42
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title add test and update hook to ruff add more tests and update pre-commit hook to ruff Jan 28, 2025
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title add more tests and update pre-commit hook to ruff test: add more tests and update pre-commit hook to ruff Feb 3, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants