Skip to content

Support for sql.gz dump restore #126

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2016
Merged

Support for sql.gz dump restore #126

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 13, 2016

Conversation

silentroach
Copy link
Contributor

It is faster sometimes to restore .sql.gz dumps. For example if you use docker-machine + virtualbox with dumps mounted via shared folders.

@ovr
Copy link

ovr commented Dec 5, 2015

👍

@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Dec 7, 2015

LGTM

cc @ltangvald

@silentroach
Copy link
Contributor Author

is something wrong with pr? it is open more than a month

@ltangvald
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry, that's on me :|
@tianon Looks good to me

ltangvald added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2016
@ltangvald ltangvald merged commit 2e80e5f into docker-library:master Jan 13, 2016
@silentroach silentroach deleted the feature/support-sql-gz branch January 13, 2016 12:01
@silentroach
Copy link
Contributor Author

thank you

@ltangvald
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the contribution! :)

yosifkit added a commit to infosiftr/stackbrew that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2016
- `golang` make alpine variant a little smaller docker-library/golang#78
- `julia` bump `0.4.3`
- `mysql` docker-library/mysql#126
- `postgres` `9.4.5-2`
- `python` docker-library/python#82
- `rabbitmq` docker-library/rabbitmq#58
RichardScothern pushed a commit to RichardScothern/official-images that referenced this pull request Jun 14, 2016
- `golang` make alpine variant a little smaller docker-library/golang#78
- `julia` bump `0.4.3`
- `mysql` docker-library/mysql#126
- `postgres` `9.4.5-2`
- `python` docker-library/python#82
- `rabbitmq` docker-library/rabbitmq#58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants