Skip to content

Pull requests missing #971

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
RafalSkolasinski opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 46 comments
Open

Pull requests missing #971

RafalSkolasinski opened this issue Jun 21, 2021 · 46 comments
Labels

Comments

@RafalSkolasinski
Copy link

Describe the bug

We recently noticed that in latest releases of our Seldon Core the Merged pull requests section is missing.

To Reproduce

Full changelog with missing pull requests for releases 1.8 and 1.9 is here.

Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Clone seldon-core
  2. Checkout master
  3. Execute
docker run --rm -it -v $(pwd):/work -w /work ruby bash -c 'gem install github_changelog_generator && bash'
    github_changelog_generator -u seldonio --token [github api token here to avoid limits] --project seldon-core
  1. See lots of errors of form
Warning: PR 3222 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3217 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3211 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3209 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3205 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3203 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3200 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3193 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3191 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3188 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3183 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3172 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3171 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3166 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3163 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3160 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3159 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3155 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3153 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3152 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3151 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3147 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3142 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3141 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3135 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3134 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3123 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3118 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3117 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3116 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3110 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3104 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3101 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3099 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3095 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3094 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3093 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3092 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3090 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3089 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3088 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3086 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3085 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3083 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3082 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3081 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3078 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3076 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3074 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3060 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3055 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3048 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3044 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 3014 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 2959 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 2955 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 2920 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 2917 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 2895 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 2742 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 2740 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 2270 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 2268 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 1795 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 659 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found

Expected behavior

No errors and pull requests always included.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: Docker on Ubuntu 20.04
  • Browser [Chrome but N/A]
  • Version [20.04]

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

@axsaucedo
Copy link

+1

Would be great if there are any insights on how to fix this

@YarikTH
Copy link

YarikTH commented Jun 26, 2021

I have a similar issue in https://github.com/YarikTH/ureact when tried to use this generator. And it seems that I found the root of at least my problem. It's because I started to merge PR using rebase. It seems that the changelog-generator doesn't know how to handle this, so it ignores PRs and emits a warning.

Note: I tried to use changelog-generator for the first time, so I have nothing to compare.

@RafalSkolasinski
Copy link
Author

Have this been by any chance confirmed by the authors? @skywinder @olleolleolle

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jul 12, 2021

+1

Only seems to happen for our most recent PR:s. The PR merged before the error appears has a lot of force pushes (locustio/locust#1805), but other than that I dont know what could be causing this.

github_changelog_generator -t ... -u locustio -p locust --exclude-labels duplicate,question,invalid,wontfix,cantfix,stale --future-release 2.0.0b2
...
Filtered issues: 798
Fetching events for issues and PR: 1218
Fetching closed dates for issues: 1218/1218
Warning: PR 1811 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 1809 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Associating PRs with tags: 420/420
Generating entry...
Done!

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jul 12, 2021

Huh. It started working for me again. Maybe after I tagged master?

@RafalSkolasinski
Copy link
Author

@cyberw Tagged master? If you would be able to identify what makes it work / not work we would be super keen to try it on our end right away :)

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jul 12, 2021

That's really the only thing I changed. I first pushed a commit directly to master (locustio/locust@61b3c28) but that didnt seem to do anything. But once I tagged that commit with 2.0.0b2 (created a release in GH web UI) it started working.

@RafalSkolasinski
Copy link
Author

Oh, you mean that the release tag should be included in the master branch?
I do believe that we have release tags on the release branches... Maybe that is the issue.

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jul 12, 2021

I dont think my issue relates to the tagging itself (I dont think I've had to tag before creating the changelog before? I'm using the --future-release param), I think it just made something refresh or work differently when there was a new tag.

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jul 12, 2021

Before tagging:

Found 63 tags
Fetching tags dates: 63/63
Sorting tags...
Received issues: 1771
Pull Request count: 636
Filtered pull requests: 420
Filtered issues: 798
Fetching events for issues and PR: 1218
Fetching closed dates for issues: 1218/1218
Warning: PR 1811 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 1809 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Associating PRs with tags: 420/420
Generating entry...
Done!
Generated log placed in /Users/lafp/git/locust/CHANGELOG.md

After tagging:

Found 64 tags
Fetching tags dates: 64/64
Sorting tags...
Received issues: 1771
Pull Request count: 636
Filtered pull requests: 420
Filtered issues: 798
Fetching events for issues and PR: 1218
Fetching closed dates for issues: 1218/1218
Associating PRs with tags: 420/420
Generating entry...
Done!
Generated log placed in /Users/lafp/git/locust/CHANGELOG.md

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jul 12, 2021

Maybe the core issue is "not found in the release branch"? Those merge commits should definitely be in the release branch (master), but maybe the tag helped changelog generator find it in some other way?

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jul 12, 2021

The more I think about it, the more that makes sense: It seems PR:s merged after the last tag arent found.

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jul 12, 2021

Yup, and now I merged another PR (without adding a tag), and the error is visible again (for that new PR).

github_changelog_generator -t ... -u locustio -p locust --exclude-labels duplicate,question,invalid,wontfix,cantfix,stale --future-release 2.0.0b3

Using these options:
:date_format=>"%Y-%m-%d"
:output=>"CHANGELOG.md"
:base=>"HISTORY.md"
:issues=>true
:add_issues_wo_labels=>true
:add_pr_wo_labels=>true
:pulls=>true
:filter_issues_by_milestone=>true
:issues_of_open_milestones=>true
:author=>true
:unreleased=>true
:unreleased_label=>"Unreleased"
:compare_link=>true
:exclude_labels=>["duplicate", "question", "invalid", "wontfix", "cantfix", "stale"]
:summary_labels=>["Release summary", "release-summary", "Summary", "summary"]
:breaking_labels=>["backwards-incompatible", "Backwards incompatible", "breaking"]
:enhancement_labels=>["enhancement", "Enhancement", "Type: Enhancement"]
:bug_labels=>["bug", "Bug", "Type: Bug"]
:deprecated_labels=>["deprecated", "Deprecated", "Type: Deprecated"]
:removed_labels=>["removed", "Removed", "Type: Removed"]
:security_labels=>["security", "Security", "Type: Security"]
:configure_sections=>{}
:add_sections=>{}
:issue_line_labels=>[]
:max_issues=>nil
:simple_list=>false
:ssl_ca_file=>nil
:verbose=>true
:header=>"# Changelog"
:merge_prefix=>"**Merged pull requests:**"
:issue_prefix=>"**Closed issues:**"
:summary_prefix=>""
:breaking_prefix=>"**Breaking changes:**"
:enhancement_prefix=>"**Implemented enhancements:**"
:bug_prefix=>"**Fixed bugs:**"
:deprecated_prefix=>"**Deprecated:**"
:removed_prefix=>"**Removed:**"
:security_prefix=>"**Security fixes:**"
:http_cache=>true
:require=>[]
:config_file=>".github_changelog_generator"
:token=>"hidden value"
:user=>"locustio"
:project=>"locust"
:future_release=>"2.0.0b3"

Found 64 tags
Fetching tags dates: 64/64
Sorting tags...
Received issues: 1773
Pull Request count: 637
Filtered pull requests: 421
Filtered issues: 799
Fetching events for issues and PR: 1220
Fetching closed dates for issues: 1220/1220
Warning: PR 1777 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Associating PRs with tags: 421/421
Generating entry...
Done!
Generated log placed in /Users/lafp/git/locust/CHANGELOG.md

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jul 16, 2021

Can you reproduce it? I'm kind of in a catch 22 situation in using tagging as a workaround, because I need to update the changelog before tagging (because tagging is what starts my package upload/release process), and I right now I cant do that :)

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
I can reproduce this with all repos I tried from the voxpupuli github org, for example voxpupuli/beaker#1711. This worked fine in the past. I tried downgrading github-changelog-generator but I get the same error on 1.16.3, 1.16.2 and 1.16.1. I also downgraded octokit to 4.20.0. All without luck. Maybe something in the github api changed? or one of the other dependencies?

bastelfreak added a commit to bastelfreak/beaker that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2021
This changelog was generated by hand because of
github-changelog-generator/github-changelog-generator#971
bastelfreak added a commit to bastelfreak/beaker that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2021
This changelog was generated by hand because of
github-changelog-generator/github-changelog-generator#971
@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor

I've another repository with the same issue: puppetlabs/puppet-lint#13

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor

I can also reproduce the issue from voxpupuli/beaker#1711 with the latest docker container:

$ docker run -it --rm -v "$(pwd)":/usr/local/src/your-app githubchangeloggenerator/github-changelog-generator --user voxpupuli --project beaker --future-release 4.30.1 -t *** --release-branch master --no-http-cache
Using these options:
:date_format=>"%Y-%m-%d"
:output=>"CHANGELOG.md"
:base=>"HISTORY.md"
:issues=>true
:add_issues_wo_labels=>true
:add_pr_wo_labels=>true
:pulls=>true
:filter_issues_by_milestone=>true
:issues_of_open_milestones=>true
:author=>true
:unreleased=>true
:unreleased_label=>"Unreleased"
:compare_link=>true
:exclude_labels=>["duplicate", "question", "invalid", "wontfix", "Duplicate", "Question", "Invalid", "Wontfix", "Meta: Exclude From Changelog"]
:summary_labels=>["Release summary", "release-summary", "Summary", "summary"]
:breaking_labels=>["backwards-incompatible", "Backwards incompatible", "breaking"]
:enhancement_labels=>["enhancement", "Enhancement", "Type: Enhancement"]
:bug_labels=>["bug", "Bug", "Type: Bug"]
:deprecated_labels=>["deprecated", "Deprecated", "Type: Deprecated"]
:removed_labels=>["removed", "Removed", "Type: Removed"]
:security_labels=>["security", "Security", "Type: Security"]
:configure_sections=>{}
:add_sections=>{}
:issue_line_labels=>[]
:max_issues=>nil
:simple_list=>false
:ssl_ca_file=>nil
:verbose=>true
:header=>"# Changelog"
:merge_prefix=>"**Merged pull requests:**"
:issue_prefix=>"**Closed issues:**"
:summary_prefix=>""
:breaking_prefix=>"**Breaking changes:**"
:enhancement_prefix=>"**Implemented enhancements:**"
:bug_prefix=>"**Fixed bugs:**"
:deprecated_prefix=>"**Deprecated:**"
:removed_prefix=>"**Removed:**"
:security_prefix=>"**Security fixes:**"
:http_cache=>false
:require=>[]
:config_file=>".github_changelog_generator"
:user=>"voxpupuli"
:project=>"beaker"
:future_release=>"4.30.1"
:token=>"hidden value"
:release_branch=>"master"

Found 209 tags                                                         
Fetching tags dates: 209/209
Sorting tags...
Received issues: 1710                                                  
Pull Request count: 1573                                               
Filtered pull requests: 1315
Filtered issues: 137
Fetching events for issues and PR: 1452                                
Fetching closed dates for issues: 1452/1452
Warning: PR 1714 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 1604 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 1276 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 939 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 352 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Associating PRs with tags: 1315/1315
Generating entry...
Done!
Generated log placed in /usr/local/src/your-app/CHANGELOG.md
 $

The listed PRs were merged into master / the release branch:

The following indeed not:

@ZedThree
Copy link

I'm seeing this in https://github.com/boutproject/BOUT-dev, except that github_changelog_generator can fetch closed PRs for the previous tag. That is, the latest tag is v4.3.2 and PRs merged since then aren't fetched, but PRs merged between v4.3.1 and v4.3.2 are.

I'm running like:

github_changelog_generator -u boutproject -p BOUT-dev --no-issues --future-release v4.3.3 --release-branch master --since-tag v4.3.1

Running like:

github_changelog_generator -u boutproject -p BOUT-dev --no-issues-wo-labels --future-release v4.3.3 --release-branch master --since-commit 2020-10-21

fetches the closed issues, but removes all of the merged PRs from the changelog.

@RafalSkolasinski
Copy link
Author

Do we have any update on this maybe? A chance that it could be fixed in the upstream or some sort of FAQ added with an official workaround?

@pokey
Copy link
Contributor

pokey commented Aug 17, 2021

For those of you seeing this issue, is it happening when your release branch is not the repository's default branch? If so, then #979 should fix it for you once merged / released

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Aug 17, 2021

For those of you seeing this issue, is it happening when your release branch is not the repository's default branch? If so, then #979 should fix it for you once merged / released

Unfortunately this is happening on master branch for me.

@kian2attari
Copy link

+1 Same here...we are encountering the error even though we are releasing on the default branch

@pokey
Copy link
Contributor

pokey commented Sep 1, 2021

@cyberw I'm currently experimenting with using release-drafter instead

@sanketsudake
Copy link

Facing the same issue on the master branch for https://github.com/fission/fission

All PRs apart from master from the last tagged release not reflecting in the changelog.

https://github.com/fission/fission/blob/master/hack/changelog.sh

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Sep 22, 2021

Still no word from @olleolleolle or any other maintainers?

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor

hey. I did some poking on the codebase. I can still reproduce this issue but I'm unable to track it down :( Has anyone some ideas here?

@ben-xD
Copy link

ben-xD commented Nov 24, 2021

As a workaround, I created a temporary new tag (e.g. temp-tag) on the release branch (in my case, it's called main, which is also the default branch). Then, I re-ran the command to the previous release tag I wanted (e.g. v1.2.5).

Then I ran the command it worked. I then deleted the tag locally and in github, to clean things up again.

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor

Hi people. This still happens with the latest master branch of github-changelog-generator. I cannot push a temporary tag to GitHub because that would automatically release it. Has someone else an idea what's happening here?

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Dec 9, 2021

Pinging @bruce-szalwinski because I just saw you commit something to master :)

I dont know, but it seems to me that this would be a showstopper for everyone not tagging before generating the changelog, yet this project doesnt seem completely stalled?

@dooleyb1
Copy link

Experiencing this exact same thing, pushing temporary tags doesn't even do the job for me.

@aperezDKT
Copy link

I'm having this issue right now, does a fix has been found for this ?

@eike-hass
Copy link

eike-hass commented Jan 11, 2022

For us the issue is resolved with the latest master branch. We just needed to figure out how to build an docker image. Any chance of an official release soonish?

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Jan 21, 2022

Hey @skywinder Sorry for nagging about this, but is there any small chance you could have a look at this? I'd look into it myself but I'm busy with my own project and it would take a long time for me to get started. Thanks.

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor

bastelfreak commented Jan 21, 2022

for my projects it's still broken, even with the latest master branch of github-changelog-generator. We generate the changelog on our master branch, not a specific release branch. This works fine on mose repos I have, except a few (like the mentioned beaker one)

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Feb 12, 2022

Spam ping @bruce-szalwinski @olleolleolle @skywinder :)

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Mar 15, 2022

I'm still dreaming of a fix @olleolleolle @skywinder :)

@jotoeri
Copy link

jotoeri commented Sep 27, 2022

My impression is, that the changelog_generator somehow jumps between the branches. Is that possible??

I attached a screenshot from GitKraken on repo nextcloud/forms. In the middle, there are the two commits called "Fix upgrading", of which one was done towards master and then ported to the stable2 branch.
I will now release from master, so ghcg should recognize #1212 and then continue with #1209 - #1208 - #1205 - #1204 - ....
Instead, ghcg starts from there on to not recognize the PRs anymore with the already known message. So my impression is, that ghcg would jump on the similar commits "Fix upgrading" into the stable2 branch and continues there. And of course - on stable2, there won't be merge commits for #1209 - #1208 - #1205 - #1204 - ....

This just as a guess from investigating. Not sure, if that mechanism could happen with how ghcg works. 🤷‍♂️

Warning: PR 1205 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
Warning: PR 1204 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found

grafik

@cyberw
Copy link

cyberw commented Oct 28, 2022

I added and then immediately removed a tag on my master branch and it worked. The tag was not even after the last merge, but still managed to trigger the inclusion of all all PRs. Kind of a bad workaround, but still a workaround.

@MartyEwings
Copy link

Folks @bruce-szalwinski @olleolleolle @skywinder this bug has finally got to the point were working around it is more work than making a change log by had, and we are looking at alternates

bastelfreak added a commit to bastelfreak/beaker that referenced this issue Mar 24, 2023
This changelog was crafted by hand, due to github-changelog-generator/github-changelog-generator#971
I used voxpupuli/beaker@4.39.0...master to
figure out the merged pull requests. A few of them only touched the CI
config or the tests, so I didn't include them.
@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor

I did some more tests today in https://github.com/voxpupuli/beaker and we still see the above mentioned errors with the master branch of github-changelog-generator :(

@conbmat
Copy link

conbmat commented Jun 21, 2024

any help for this issue, @bastelfreak

Check the Rails upgrade guide at https://guides.rubyonrails.org/upgrading_ruby_on_rails.html#new-activesupport-cache-serialization-format
for more information on how to upgrade.
(called from block in initialize at /var/lib/gems/3.0.0/gems/activesupport-7.1.3.2/lib/active_support/cache.rb:327)
Found 30 tags
Fetching tags dates: 30/30
Sorting tags...
Received issues: 185
Pull Request count: 185
Filtered pull requests: 153
Filtered issues: 0
Fetching events for issues and PR: 153
Fetching closed dates for issues: 153/153
Warning: PR 115 merge commit was not found in the release branch or tagged git history and no rebased SHA comment was found
/var/lib/gems/3.0.0/gems/github_changelog_generator-1.16.4/lib/github_changelog_generator/generator/generator_fetcher.rb:86:in `block in associate_tagged_prs': No merge sha found for PR 115 via the GitHub API (StandardError)
from /var/lib/gems/3.0.0/gems/github_changelog_generator-

@bastelfreak
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not the maintainer here, just a user. And I wasn't able to fix it for the beaker repo I linked above :(

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests