Skip to content

Conversation

daspecster
Copy link
Contributor

@daspecster daspecster commented Jun 13, 2016

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jun 13, 2016
@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tseaver, what do you think about merging in #1815 and #1844 for this release?

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tseaver, #1844 got merged and I'm inclined to leave #1813 out unless we can merge it today. But I'm not sure about #1815?

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 15, 2016

I just merged #1815. I think we should merge #1813 today, and then make a release.

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 15, 2016

$ git log -1 --pretty=%H
a74ed9e3e8a8abbe46ca7968ed21cb9a1762dda9
$ git log 0.15.0..HEAD | grep 'Merge pull request ' |  awk -F ' ' '{print $4}' | sort

yields:

#1815
#1816
#1843
#1848
#1851
#1855
#1861

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 15, 2016

0.16.0 Release Notes

Core

Datastore

Storage

Pubsub

Bigtable

Logging

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tseaver also I made a release draft for 0.16.0 just fyi.

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tseaver, when I rerun

$ git log 0.15.0..HEAD | grep 'Merge pull request ' |  awk -F ' ' '{print $4}' | sort

I don't see the new PRs in there...#1813, #1860, #1844...possibly others?

Any ideas?

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 16, 2016

Have you merged your local master with upstream/master?

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

I rebased it.

Do they show up for you?

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 16, 2016

Also, "merge w/ squash commits" doesn't create a merge commit findable by that command line. I manually ran git log 0.15.0..HEAD and looked at the commits to uncover #1844, for instance.

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ah that's it! I did use the github squash merge and I didn't add "Merge pull request" to the commit message.

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

I left out #1860 since you mentioned it's not user facing really.

@tseaver I think once we get the GRPCIO 0.14.0 issues on appveyor and the docs generation working we can cut this release right?

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 16, 2016

I think once we get the GRPCIO 0.14.0 issues on appveyor and the docs generation working we can cut this release right?

SGTM

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 17, 2016

Is grpcio 0.14.0 expected to Just Work (TM) on Windows? Given my last comments on #1863, I'd say we could go ahead with our release even though Appveyor is broken.

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tseaver, is there any fallout we could be heading towards by releasing?

It looks like my credentials helper function errors if it doesn't have permissions. I can just catch that in an except so it fails more peacefully.

https://ci.appveyor.com/project/daspecster/gcloud-python/build/1.0.1.master/job/433qv2dtg3uq4a4t#L513

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 17, 2016

I'd say we can go ahead and release, unless @jgeewax thinks that the grpico-on-Windows bit from #1815 is a blocker.

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tseaver we could merge in #1868 to fix some of the appveyor issues but not all obviously.

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

Sounds good. The remaining failures will then be blocked on a fix for grpc/grpc#6939.

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok, sounds like a plan. Is there anything we can do to help resolve that?

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

@daspecster I just updated the checklist to pull in #1870 and the need to fix #1869.

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

@daspecster #1874 reverts pubsub defaults to the safe JSON-over-HTTP. AFAIK, it would be the last change needed before merging here.

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

We should probably note this in the release notes.

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

@daspecster I just updated the release note above for pubsub.

@daspecster
Copy link
Contributor Author

Good to go then right?

@tseaver
Copy link
Contributor

tseaver commented Jun 20, 2016

Yup!

@daspecster daspecster merged commit 986302f into googleapis:master Jun 20, 2016
@daspecster daspecster deleted the cut-0.16.0 branch January 24, 2017 15:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants