Skip to content

Add a troubleshooting section for APCUPSD #38812

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 30, 2025

Conversation

yuxincs
Copy link
Contributor

@yuxincs yuxincs commented Apr 30, 2025

Proposed change

This PR adds a troubleshooting section for APCUPSD. We also moved a previous "note" to the troubleshooting section for better presentation.

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

  • Link to parent pull request in the codebase:
  • Link to parent pull request in the Brands repository:
  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Expanded and reorganized troubleshooting guidance with detailed sections on connection issues and missing entities for improved clarity.

@home-assistant home-assistant bot added the current This PR goes into the current branch label Apr 30, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 4936e9a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/6811e28bf9871f000882fe3f
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-38812--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 30, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The documentation for the APCUPSD integration was updated by removing a brief note about the ConnectionRefusedError from the configuration section and introducing a new, expanded "Troubleshooting" section. This new section provides more comprehensive guidance on handling connection failures and missing entities, including checks for configuration settings and daemon status, as well as explanations for entity disappearance after restarts.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown Removed a brief note about ConnectionRefusedError from configuration; added a detailed "Troubleshooting" section covering connection issues and entity availability.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant HomeAssistant
    participant APCUPSD Daemon

    User->>HomeAssistant: Configure APCUPSD integration
    HomeAssistant->>APCUPSD Daemon: Attempt connection (using NISIP & NISPORT)
    alt Connection successful
        HomeAssistant-->>User: Integration works as expected
    else Connection refused
        HomeAssistant-->>User: Display troubleshooting guidance (check NISIP/NISPORT, use apcaccess)
    end
    Note over HomeAssistant,APCUPSD Daemon: On Home Assistant or daemon restart,
    HomeAssistant-->>User: Some entities may disappear (explained in troubleshooting)
Loading

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown (1)

145-146: Ensure proper spacing before the new section heading

Add a blank line before the ## Troubleshooting heading to improve Markdown readability and maintain consistency with surrounding sections.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7b0096d and 40dae86.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown

[uncategorized] ~149-~149: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...ting ### Failed to connect If you get "Failed to connect" error when setting up...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)


[style] ~149-~149: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can not”.
Context: ...ant logs), it means that Home Assistant is not able to connect to the daemon. Please check if ...

(BE_ABLE_TO)

🪛 GitHub Actions: home-assistant.io Test
source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown

[error] 153-153: textlint: Incorrect usage of the term: “APCUPSD”, use “apcupsd” instead (terminology)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs

Comment on lines 147 to 150
### Failed to connect

If you get "Failed to connect" error when setting up the integration (and/or `ConnectionRefusedError: Connection refused` errors in the Home Assistant logs), it means that Home Assistant is not able to connect to the daemon. Please check if the `NISIP`/`NISPORT` in the apcupsd configuration file is properly configured. Additionally, try running `apcaccess` on the host machine to see if the daemon is working properly.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix grammar and style in “Failed to connect” subsection

  • Add the missing article “a” before “Failed to connect” error.
  • Use backticks for the error string to follow code formatting: `Failed to connect`.
  • Replace “not able to connect” with “cannot connect” for conciseness.

Apply this diff:

@@ -147,4 +147,6 @@ ### Failed to connect
-If you get "Failed to connect" error when setting up the integration (and/or `ConnectionRefusedError: Connection refused` errors in the Home Assistant logs), it means that Home Assistant is not able to connect to the daemon. Please check if the `NISIP`/`NISPORT` in the apcupsd configuration file is properly configured. Additionally, try running `apcaccess` on the host machine to see if the daemon is working properly.
+If you get a `Failed to connect` error when setting up the integration (and/or `ConnectionRefusedError: Connection refused` errors in the Home Assistant logs), it means that Home Assistant cannot connect to the daemon. Please check if the `NISIP`/`NISPORT` in the apcupsd configuration file is properly configured. Additionally, run `apcaccess` on the host machine to verify that the daemon is working correctly.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
### Failed to connect
If you get "Failed to connect" error when setting up the integration (and/or `ConnectionRefusedError: Connection refused` errors in the Home Assistant logs), it means that Home Assistant is not able to connect to the daemon. Please check if the `NISIP`/`NISPORT` in the apcupsd configuration file is properly configured. Additionally, try running `apcaccess` on the host machine to see if the daemon is working properly.
### Failed to connect
If you get a `Failed to connect` error when setting up the integration (and/or `ConnectionRefusedError: Connection refused` errors in the Home Assistant logs), it means that Home Assistant cannot connect to the daemon. Please check if the `NISIP`/`NISPORT` in the apcupsd configuration file is properly configured. Additionally, run `apcaccess` on the host machine to verify that the daemon is working correctly.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[uncategorized] ~149-~149: You might be missing the article “a” here.
Context: ...ting ### Failed to connect If you get "Failed to connect" error when setting up...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_A)


[style] ~149-~149: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can not”.
Context: ...ant logs), it means that Home Assistant is not able to connect to the daemon. Please check if ...

(BE_ABLE_TO)

Comment on lines 151 to 154
### Some entities are no longer provided

If certain entities are missing after a Home Assistant restart, it's likely because they represent event-based data that only appears after specific UPS events (e.g. transfer to battery). These entities are cleared when the APCUPSD daemon restarts and won’t reappear until the corresponding event occurs again.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Lowercase “APCUPSD” in the second subsection

The term “APCUPSD” should be lowercase (“apcupsd”) to comply with Home Assistant’s terminology guidelines and resolve the textlint error.

Apply this diff:

@@ -153,2 +153,2 @@
-These entities are cleared when the APCUPSD daemon restarts and won’t reappear until the corresponding event occurs again.
+These entities are cleared when the apcupsd daemon restarts and won’t reappear until the corresponding event occurs again.
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
### Some entities are no longer provided
If certain entities are missing after a Home Assistant restart, it's likely because they represent event-based data that only appears after specific UPS events (e.g. transfer to battery). These entities are cleared when the APCUPSD daemon restarts and won’t reappear until the corresponding event occurs again.
### Some entities are no longer provided
If certain entities are missing after a Home Assistant restart, it's likely because they represent event-based data that only appears after specific UPS events (e.g. transfer to battery). These entities are cleared when the apcupsd daemon restarts and won’t reappear until the corresponding event occurs again.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: home-assistant.io Test

[error] 153-153: textlint: Incorrect usage of the term: “APCUPSD”, use “apcupsd” instead (terminology)

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown (1)

147-150: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refine "Failed to connect" subsection style and grammar

We should align with documentation standards by:

  • Using backticks for the error string.
  • Adding the missing article “a” before “Failed to connect” error.
  • Replacing “is not able to connect” with “cannot connect” for conciseness.
  • Using “run” instead of “try running” for a direct instruction.

Apply this diff:

 ### Failed to connect
-If you get a **Failed to connect** error when setting up the integration (and/or `ConnectionRefusedError: Connection refused` errors in the Home Assistant logs), it means that Home Assistant is not able to connect to the APC UPS daemon. Please check if the `NISIP`/`NISPORT` in the apcupsd configuration file is properly configured. Additionally, try running `apcaccess` on the host machine to see if the daemon is working properly.
+If you get a `Failed to connect` error when setting up the integration (and/or `ConnectionRefusedError: Connection refused` errors in the Home Assistant logs), it means that Home Assistant cannot connect to the apcupsd daemon. Please check that the `NISIP`/`NISPORT` settings in the `apcupsd.conf` file are correct. Additionally, run `apcaccess` on the host machine to verify that the daemon is working correctly.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~149-~149: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can not”.
Context: ...ant logs), it means that Home Assistant is not able to connect to the APC UPS daemon. Please c...

(BE_ABLE_TO)

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown (1)

151-154: Clarify entity availability and lowercase integration name

For consistency with terminology guidelines and to improve clarity, lowercase the integration name and consider making the heading more descriptive. For example:

-### Some entities are no longer provided
+### Some entities are cleared on restart

-These entities are cleared when the APC UPS Daemon restarts and won’t reappear until the corresponding event occurs again.
+These entities are cleared when the apcupsd daemon restarts and won’t reappear until the corresponding event occurs again.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5c1a1d7 and 4936e9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown

[style] ~149-~149: As a shorter alternative for ‘able to’, consider using “can not”.
Context: ...ant logs), it means that Home Assistant is not able to connect to the APC UPS daemon. Please c...

(BE_ABLE_TO)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - home-assistant-docs
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - home-assistant-docs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/apcupsd.markdown (1)

145-146: Approve the new Troubleshooting header

The addition of a dedicated Troubleshooting section enhances clarity and makes it easier for users to locate common error-handling guidance.

Copy link
Contributor

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @yuxincs 👍

@c0ffeeca7 c0ffeeca7 merged commit 5a831c3 into home-assistant:current Apr 30, 2025
7 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 1, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
current This PR goes into the current branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants