Skip to content

Update name checking #1083

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025
Merged

Update name checking #1083

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

n0rt0nthec4t
Copy link
Contributor

Updated name checking to allow names with characters in with the Home app actually supports

Allow characters in names to match what Home app ACTUALLY supports
Copy link
Contributor

@ebaauw ebaauw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Happy with these changes.

Out of interest: what character is \u2019?

However, I still think the name check should be a skipped for DisplayName on an InputSource service for a TV accessory. For this service, DisplayName doesn’t seem to be linked to the service name.

@n0rt0nthec4t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Happy with these changes.

Out of interest: what character is \u2019?

unicode right apostrophe

@n0rt0nthec4t
Copy link
Contributor Author

Chop chop.. Lets get moving on approvals and get this implemented

@KhaosT
Copy link
Contributor

KhaosT commented Feb 7, 2025

@n0rt0nthec4t Erik already approved it last week, you should be good to merge?

@n0rt0nthec4t
Copy link
Contributor Author

n0rt0nthec4t commented Feb 7, 2025

@n0rt0nthec4t Erik already approved it last week, you should be good to merge?

Understood it needed all 11 reviewers to approve as says 10 still outstanding?

I dont have access to merge ;-)

@KhaosT KhaosT merged commit e51f0a9 into homebridge:latest Feb 7, 2025
24 checks passed
@KhaosT
Copy link
Contributor

KhaosT commented Feb 7, 2025

@n0rt0nthec4t ah I see. I believe the rule just needs one review. I thought after it's approved everyone can hit the merge button. Guess that's not the case 😅 Now it's merged, thanks for the PR 🙏

donavanbecker added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
## v1.1.0 (2025-02-11)

### Changes

- Update name checking (#1083)

### Other Changes

- Update docs
- support node 22 + dependency updates (#1075)
@donavanbecker donavanbecker mentioned this pull request Feb 11, 2025
donavanbecker added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
v1.1.1

- Update name checking (#1083)

- Update docs
- support node 22 + dependency updates (#1075)
donavanbecker added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
- Update name checking (#1083)

- Update docs
- support node 22 + dependency updates (#1075)
donavanbecker added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 11, 2025
v1.1.1

- Update name checking (#1083)

- Update docs
- support node 22 + dependency updates (#1075)
donavanbecker added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2025
v1.1.1

- Update name checking (#1083)

- Update docs
- support node 22 + dependency updates (#1075)
donavanbecker added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 8, 2025
## v1.1.0 (2025-02-11)

### Changes

- Update name checking (#1083)

### Other Changes

- Update docs
- support node 22 + dependency updates (#1075)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants