-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
Deprecate update_datalim_bounds. #16025
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given this is documented fairly well at current, I think the API note should list an alternative solution.
Sorry, something went wrong.
All reactions
0c637a5
to
0013334
Compare
Mentioned the alternative (which is just inlining the existing implementation). |
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong.
0013334
to
cfa859e
Compare
rebased |
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong.
sorry, too many merges and this needs to be rebased again... |
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong.
... did it with the online editor. |
All reactions
Sorry, something went wrong.
This method was introduced in 56d43e6 with a note that it would be more efficient to use it in some cases, then the note went away in ad74c3f (2008) without the method ever being used either before or after. In any case, it is simple enough to be reimplemented (possibly inline) if we really need it.
6e8587a
to
93edb74
Compare
This method was introduced in 56d43e6 with a note that it would be more
efficient to use it in some cases, then the note went away in ad74c3f
(2008) without the method ever being used either before or after. In
any case, it is simple enough to be reimplemented (possibly inline) if
we really need it.
PR Summary
PR Checklist