Skip to content

Conversation

lu-yg
Copy link
Collaborator

@lu-yg lu-yg commented Jan 27, 2025

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new BlockParam data transfer object for enhanced block management
    • Improved type safety for block-related operations
  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved potential data handling inconsistencies in block creation and update processes
  • Refactor

    • Updated method signatures across multiple services and controllers to use BlockParam
    • Removed block_group_id column from block-related database tables
    • Standardized block data handling across the application
  • Chores

    • Updated GitHub workflow configurations for code quality and build processes

lu-yg and others added 30 commits December 26, 2024 00:15
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a comprehensive refactoring of the block-related components in the application. The primary changes involve replacing BlockDto with a new BlockParam data transfer object across multiple files, including controllers, services, and test classes. Additionally, the database schema has been modified by removing the block_group_id column from block-related tables. The workflow configurations for GitHub Actions have also been updated, with changes to the Checkstyle and Maven workflow files.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/checkstyle.yml Updated workflow configuration with explicit JDK distribution and consolidated Checkstyle check process
.github/workflows/maven.yml File deleted
app/src/main/resources/sql/mysql/create_all_tables_ddl_v1.mysql.sql Removed block_group_id column from t_block and t_block_history tables
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockController.java Updated method signatures to use BlockParam instead of BlockDto
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockDto.java Changed groups field type from List<Object> to List<BlockGroup>
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockParam.java New DTO class introduced with comprehensive field definitions
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/BlockService.java Updated method signatures to use BlockParam
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java Refactored methods to work with BlockParam, added new createBuildInfo method
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockControllerTest.java Updated test methods to use BlockParam
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImplTest.java Modified test cases to use BlockParam

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Controller as BlockController
    participant Service as BlockService
    participant Repository as BlockRepository
    
    Controller->>Service: createBlock(BlockParam)
    Service->>Repository: Save block data
    Repository-->>Service: Return saved block
    Service-->>Controller: Return BlockDto
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • hexqi

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Ode to Code Refactoring 🔧

Blocks of code, once static and plain,
Now dance with BlockParam without strain
Columns vanish, workflows align
Type safety makes the codebase shine
Refactoring: our digital delight! 🌟

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🔭 Outside diff range comments (9)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockController.java (2)

Line range hint 154-171: Add input validation for BlockParam fields.

While the method signature has been updated correctly, consider adding validation annotations on the BlockParam fields to ensure data integrity.


Line range hint 382-403: Consider adding transaction boundary.

The update operation involves multiple database operations (updating block and group associations). Consider adding transaction boundaries to ensure data consistency.

+    @Transactional
     public Result<BlockDto> updateBlocks(@Valid @RequestBody BlockParam blockParam, @PathVariable Integer id,
                                          @RequestParam(value = "appId", required = false) Integer appId) {
         blockParam.setId(id);
         return blockService.updateBlockById(blockParam, appId);
     }
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java (7)

Line range hint 154-204: Add null checks and validation.

The method should validate the BlockParam object before processing to prevent NullPointerException.

     public Result<BlockDto> updateBlockById(BlockParam blockParam, Integer appId) {
+        if (blockParam == null || blockParam.getId() == null) {
+            return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM001);
+        }
         Block blockResult = blockMapper.queryBlockById(blockParam.getId());

Line range hint 210-239: Add error handling for group creation failure.

The method should handle potential failures when creating block group associations.

         if (groups != null && !groups.isEmpty()) {
             Integer groupId = groups.get(0);
             BlockGroupBlock blockGroupBlock = new BlockGroupBlock();
             blockGroupBlock.setBlockGroupId(groupId);
             blockGroupBlock.setBlockId(id);
-            blockGroupBlockMapper.createBlockGroupBlock(blockGroupBlock);
+            int groupResult = blockGroupBlockMapper.createBlockGroupBlock(blockGroupBlock);
+            if (groupResult < 1) {
+                return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM001);
+            }
         }

Line range hint 154-203: Transaction management missing.

The method performs multiple database operations without transaction management.

Add transaction management to ensure data consistency:

+    @Transactional
     @Override
     public Result<BlockDto> updateBlockById(BlockParam blockParam, Integer appId) {
         Block blockResult = blockMapper.queryBlockById(blockParam.getId());

Also, the method has potential null pointer issues:

Add null checks:

     public Result<BlockDto> updateBlockById(BlockParam blockParam, Integer appId) {
+        if (blockParam == null || blockParam.getId() == null) {
+            return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM001);
+        }
         Block blockResult = blockMapper.queryBlockById(blockParam.getId());
+        if (blockResult == null) {
+            return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM001);
+        }

Line range hint 210-239: Hardcoded values and missing validation.

The method contains hardcoded values and lacks input validation.

Add validation and extract constants:

+    private static final int DEFAULT_PLATFORM_ID = 1;
+    private static final String DEFAULT_USER_ID = "1";
+
     @Override
+    @Transactional
     public Result<BlockDto> createBlock(BlockParam blockParam) {
+        if (blockParam == null) {
+            return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM001);
+        }
         Block blocks = new Block();
         if (blockParam.getOccupier() != null) {
             blocks.setOccupierBy(String.valueOf(blockParam.getOccupier().getId()));
         }
         BeanUtils.copyProperties(blockParam, blocks);
         blocks.setIsDefault(false);
         blocks.setIsOfficial(false);
-        blocks.setPlatformId(1); // 新建区块给默认值
+        blocks.setPlatformId(DEFAULT_PLATFORM_ID);

Line range hint 505-543: Error handling needs improvement.

The deploy method lacks proper error handling for edge cases.

Add error handling:

     public Result<BlockDto> deploy(BlockBuildDto blockBuildDto) {
+        if (blockBuildDto == null || blockBuildDto.getBlock() == null) {
+            return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM001);
+        }
         Map<String, Object> content = blockBuildDto.getBlock().getContent();
         if (content.isEmpty()) {
             return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM204);
         }
+        try {
             BlockParam blockParam = blockBuildDto.getBlock();
             List<I18nEntryDto> i18nList = i18nEntryMapper.findI18nEntriesByHostandHostType(id, "block");
             // ... rest of the method
             return updateBlockById(blockParam, blockParam.getAppId());
+        } catch (Exception e) {
+            log.error("Failed to deploy block: {}", e.getMessage(), e);
+            return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM008);
+        }
     }

Line range hint 154-204: Implement transaction management for block updates.

The method performs multiple database operations:

  1. Updating block data
  2. Managing block group associations
    These operations should be wrapped in a transaction to maintain data consistency.

Line range hint 210-239: Add null checks and validation.

The method should validate:

  1. Required fields in BlockParam
  2. Business rules for block creation
  3. Proper error handling for database operations
🧹 Nitpick comments (15)
.github/workflows/checkstyle.yml (1)

28-30: Optimize the Maven command for Checkstyle.

The current mvn clean install command runs the full build cycle including tests, which is more than needed for style checking. Consider using a more focused command.

-          mvn clean install
+          mvn checkstyle:check
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockParam.java (2)

152-155: Consider adding validation for publicStatus values.

The getPublic() method returns publicStatus directly. Since the field is documented to accept values 0,1,2, consider adding validation.

@JsonProperty("public")
public Integer getPublic() {
+    if (this.publicStatus != null && !Arrays.asList(0, 1, 2).contains(this.publicStatus)) {
+        throw new IllegalStateException("Invalid public status value: " + this.publicStatus);
+    }
    return this.publicStatus;
}

1-157: Document the relationship between BlockDto and BlockParam.

Since this is a new class that seems to be replacing BlockDto in some contexts, consider adding documentation to explain:

  • The purpose of having both DTOs
  • When to use each one
  • How they relate to each other

Add the following to the class-level documentation:

/**
 * <p>
 * 区块param
 * </p>
 *
+ * This class serves as a parameter object for block creation and updates,
+ * working in conjunction with {@link BlockDto}. While BlockDto represents
+ * the full block data model, BlockParam is specifically designed for
+ * handling input parameters during block operations.
 *
 * @author lu-yg
 * @since 2024-01-27
 */
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockControllerTest.java (4)

184-191: Consider adding more test scenarios.

While the basic test case is correct, consider adding test scenarios for:

  • Invalid block parameters
  • Missing required fields
  • Edge cases with different group configurations

101-106: Test needs additional assertions.

The test only verifies the returned data but doesn't validate if the BlockParam properties were correctly passed to the service layer.

Add assertions to verify the BlockParam properties:

 @Test
 void testCreateBlocks() {
     BlockParam mockParam = new BlockParam();
+    mockParam.setName("Test Block");
+    mockParam.setLabel("test-block");
     BlockDto mockData = new BlockDto();
+    mockData.setName("Test Block");
+    mockData.setLabel("test-block");
     when(blockService.createBlock(any(BlockParam.class))).thenReturn(Result.success(mockData));

     Result<BlockDto> result = blockController.createBlocks(mockParam);
     Assertions.assertEquals(mockData, result.getData());
+    verify(blockService).createBlock(argThat(param -> 
+        param.getName().equals("Test Block") && 
+        param.getLabel().equals("test-block")
+    ));
 }

184-191: Test needs additional assertions and error case coverage.

The test only covers the happy path but doesn't verify error scenarios or parameter validation.

Add test cases for error scenarios:

 @Test
 void testUpdateBlocks() {
     BlockParam blockParam = new BlockParam();
+    blockParam.setName("Updated Block");
     BlockDto returnData = new BlockDto();
+    returnData.setName("Updated Block");
     when(blockService.updateBlockById(any(BlockParam.class), anyInt())).thenReturn(Result.success(returnData));
     when(blockService.queryBlockById(anyInt())).thenReturn(returnData);

     Result<BlockDto> result = blockController.updateBlocks(blockParam, Integer.valueOf(0), Integer.valueOf(1));
     Assertions.assertEquals(returnData, result.getData());
+    verify(blockService).updateBlockById(argThat(param -> 
+        param.getName().equals("Updated Block") &&
+        param.getId().equals(0)
+    ), eq(1));
 }

+@Test
+void testUpdateBlocksWithInvalidId() {
+    BlockParam blockParam = new BlockParam();
+    when(blockService.updateBlockById(any(BlockParam.class), anyInt()))
+        .thenReturn(Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM007));
+
+    Result<BlockDto> result = blockController.updateBlocks(blockParam, -1, 1);
+    Assertions.assertTrue(result.isFailed());
+    Assertions.assertEquals(ExceptionEnum.CM007.getCode(), result.getCode());
+}

184-191: Verify test coverage for error scenarios.

While the happy path is tested, consider adding test cases for:

  • Invalid block parameters
  • Non-existent block ID
  • Permission denied scenarios
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java (4)

Line range hint 505-543: Consider extracting build info creation to a separate method.

The build info creation logic can be extracted to improve readability and reusability.

+    private Map<String, Object> createBuildInfo(String version, LocalDateTime buildTime) {
+        Map<String, Object> buildInfo = new HashMap<>();
+        buildInfo.put("result", true);
+        buildInfo.put("versions", Arrays.asList(version));
+        DateTimeFormatter formatter = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss");
+        buildInfo.put("endTime", buildTime.format(formatter));
+        return buildInfo;
+    }

669-685: Add logging for block creation.

Consider adding debug logging to track block creation and updates.

     public int ensureBlockId(BlockParam blockParam) {
+        log.debug("Ensuring block ID for label: {}", blockParam.getLabel());
         if (blockParam.getId() != null) {
+            log.debug("Block ID already exists: {}", blockParam.getId());
             return blockParam.getId();
         }

Line range hint 505-543: Consider extracting deployment logic.

The deploy method handles multiple responsibilities:

  1. Block creation/update
  2. History tracking
  3. I18n handling
  4. Build info management

Consider extracting these into separate methods for better maintainability.


669-685: Add logging for block creation events.

Consider adding debug logs to track:

  1. Block creation attempts
  2. Existing block lookups
  3. Creation success/failure
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockController.java (2)

Line range hint 154-171: API documentation needs improvement.

The method documentation lacks details about the BlockParam structure and validation requirements.

Add detailed documentation:

     /**
      * 创建block
      *
-     * @param blockParam the blockParam
+     * @param blockParam The block parameters containing:
+     *                  - name: Block name (required)
+     *                  - label: Unique identifier (required)
+     *                  - framework: Framework type (required)
+     *                  - groups: List of group IDs (optional)
+     *                  - content: Block content (optional)
+     *                  - screenshot: Block screenshot (optional)
      * @return BlockDto with created block details
+     * @throws ValidationException if required fields are missing
      */

Line range hint 154-171: Update API documentation to reflect parameter changes.

The Swagger documentation should include:

  1. Detailed description of required fields in BlockParam
  2. Example request payload
  3. Possible error responses
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImplTest.java (2)

118-121: Add validation for required fields.

The test initializes an empty BlockParam object. Consider adding test cases that validate the required fields and their constraints.


126-134: Enhance test coverage for block update scenarios.

The test should verify:

  1. Block group associations are correctly updated
  2. History tracking is maintained
  3. Proper error handling when block doesn't exist
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d5aa1d0 and 9c1225a.

📒 Files selected for processing (11)
  • .github/workflows/checkstyle.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/maven.yml (0 hunks)
  • app/src/main/resources/sql/mysql/create_all_tables_ddl_v1.mysql.sql (0 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockController.java (6 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockBuildDto.java (1 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockDto.java (2 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockParam.java (1 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/BlockService.java (2 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java (9 hunks)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockControllerTest.java (3 hunks)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImplTest.java (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • app/src/main/resources/sql/mysql/create_all_tables_ddl_v1.mysql.sql
  • .github/workflows/maven.yml
👮 Files not reviewed due to content moderation or server errors (4)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockControllerTest.java
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImplTest.java
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockController.java
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java
🔇 Additional comments (11)
.github/workflows/checkstyle.yml (2)

25-25: LGTM! Good practice specifying the JDK distribution.

Explicitly setting the distribution to 'temurin' improves reproducibility.


37-37: Verify the Checkstyle report path.

Let's verify if the Checkstyle report is generated at the specified path.

✅ Verification successful

The Checkstyle report path is correctly configured

The path target/checkstyle-result.xml is the default output location for Maven Checkstyle plugin when using the check goal, and the configuration in your pom.xml follows this convention without any custom output path overrides.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Maven's default Checkstyle report location
# and any custom configurations in pom.xml

# Check if pom.xml specifies a custom output directory for Checkstyle
echo "Checking for custom Checkstyle configuration in pom.xml..."
rg -A 5 '<plugin>.*checkstyle' 

# Look for any existing Checkstyle XML configurations
echo "Looking for Checkstyle configuration files..."
fd -e xml -e properties checkstyle

Length of output: 335


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check Maven Checkstyle plugin configuration in pom.xml
echo "Checking Maven Checkstyle plugin configuration..."
rg -A 10 'maven-checkstyle-plugin' 

# Also check if there's a parent pom that might define the configuration
echo "Checking parent pom references..."
rg '<parent>' -A 5

Length of output: 1605

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockBuildDto.java (1)

26-26: Verify the impact of changing BlockDto to BlockParam.

The field type change from BlockDto to BlockParam might affect existing code that creates or processes BlockBuildDto instances.

✅ Verification successful

Type change from BlockDto to BlockParam is correct and intentional

The change aligns with the codebase's pattern where BlockParam is consistently used for block modifications while BlockDto is used for querying. The BlockBuildDto.block field is correctly typed as BlockParam since it's used in the deploy() method for block updates.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for BlockBuildDto usage to verify compatibility
echo "Searching for BlockBuildDto instantiations and field access..."
rg -l "new BlockBuildDto|getBlock\(\)|setBlock\(" 

# Search for any test files that might need updates
echo "Searching for related test files..."
fd -g "*Test.java" --exec rg -l "BlockBuildDto"

Length of output: 396


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine the implementation file
echo "Content of BlockServiceImpl.java:"
cat base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java

echo -e "\nSearching for BlockDto and BlockParam definitions:"
rg -l "class BlockDto|class BlockParam"

echo -e "\nChecking for inheritance relationships:"
ast-grep --pattern 'class BlockParam extends $_'
ast-grep --pattern 'class BlockDto extends $_'

Length of output: 26340

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/BlockService.java (2)

78-81: Verify that all implementations of createBlock are updated.

The parameter type change from BlockDto to BlockParam requires updates to all implementing classes.

✅ Verification successful

All implementations are correctly updated

The only implementation BlockServiceImpl is already using the new BlockParam parameter type, matching the interface change. No other implementations were found in the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for implementations of createBlock
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements BlockService {
  $$$
  Result<BlockDto> createBlock($_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 120


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find classes implementing BlockService
echo "=== Classes implementing BlockService ==="
rg "class\s+\w+\s+implements\s+.*BlockService" -l

echo -e "\n=== createBlock implementations with BlockDto parameter ==="
rg "createBlock\s*\(\s*BlockDto\s+" -A 2

echo -e "\n=== createBlock implementations with BlockParam parameter ==="
rg "createBlock\s*\(\s*BlockParam\s+" -A 2

Length of output: 1263


70-73: Verify that all implementations of updateBlockById are updated.

The parameter type change from BlockDto to BlockParam requires updates to all implementing classes.

✅ Verification successful

Implementation is properly updated to match the interface change

The implementation in BlockServiceImpl.java correctly uses the new parameter types (BlockParam and Integer appId) and return type (Result).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for implementations of updateBlockById
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ implements BlockService {
  $$$
  Result<BlockDto> updateBlockById($_, $_) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 128


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find files containing classes that implement BlockService
rg "implements\s+BlockService" -l

# Find updateBlockById method implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'updateBlockById($$$) {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 170


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# View the implementation file
cat base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java

Length of output: 25719

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockDto.java (1)

137-137: Type safety improvement: List to List.

The change improves type safety by using a specific type instead of Object. However, verify that all existing data is compatible with BlockGroup.

✅ Verification successful

Type safety change is correct and safe

The change from List<Object> to List<BlockGroup> is verified to be safe. The codebase consistently uses BlockGroup objects in this context, with proper service layer handling for conversions between IDs and full BlockGroup objects. The existing type checks and usage patterns confirm BlockGroup was already the intended type.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for places where groups field is accessed or modified
rg -A 2 "getGroups\(\)|setGroups\(" 

# Search for BlockGroup usage to understand the expected structure
ast-grep --pattern 'class BlockGroup {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 2523


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for BlockGroup class definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class BlockGroup {
  $$$
}'

# Search for BlockParam class definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class BlockParam {
  $$$
}'

# Search for any conversion between Integer and BlockGroup
rg -A 3 "new BlockGroup|BlockGroup\(" 

Length of output: 16446

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockParam.java (1)

133-135: Verify the type difference in groups field between BlockDto and BlockParam.

BlockDto uses List<BlockGroup> while BlockParam uses List<Integer>. This difference might cause issues during conversion between the two types.

✅ Verification successful

Type difference between BlockDto and BlockParam is intentional and properly handled

The difference in types is a common pattern where:

  • BlockParam uses List<Integer> to accept group IDs as input
  • BlockDto uses List<BlockGroup> to return full group objects
  • BlockServiceImpl handles the conversion by fetching full BlockGroup objects using the IDs
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for places where conversion between BlockDto and BlockParam occurs
rg -A 5 "new BlockDto|new BlockParam" 

# Search for places where groups field is accessed
ast-grep --pattern '$_.getGroups()'

Length of output: 10180


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find BlockDto class definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class BlockDto {
  $$$
}'

# Search for conversion methods between BlockDto and BlockParam
rg -A 10 "BlockDto.*BlockParam|BlockParam.*BlockDto"

# Search for BlockGroup usage in BlockDto
rg -A 3 "List<BlockGroup>.*groups"

Length of output: 10313

base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockControllerTest.java (2)

101-106: LGTM! Test setup correctly reflects the API changes.

The test case has been properly updated to use BlockParam instead of BlockDto, maintaining consistency with the controller's method signature changes.


101-106: LGTM! Test setup correctly reflects the API changes.

The test correctly uses the new BlockParam class and properly mocks the service layer response.

base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockController.java (2)

Line range hint 382-403: Method needs input validation.

The method accepts nullable appId but doesn't document the behavior when appId is null.

Add validation and improve documentation:

     /**
      * 修改block
      *
-     * @param blockParam blockParam
-     * @param id       id
+     * @param blockParam Block parameters to update
+     * @param id Block ID to update
+     * @param appId Application ID (optional) - If null, the block's existing appId will be used
      * @return block dto
+     * @throws ValidationException if block ID doesn't exist
+     * @throws SecurityException if user doesn't have permission to update the block
      */
     @Operation(summary = "修改区块",
             description = "修改区块",
             parameters = {
                     @Parameter(name = "blockParam", description = "入参对象"),
                     @Parameter(name = "id", description = "区块id")
             },

Also, verify that the block exists before updating:


Line range hint 382-403: Consider adding request validation.

The endpoint should validate:

  1. Block existence before update
  2. User permissions
  3. Business rules for block updates

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockControllerTest.java (2)

104-116: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add more test cases for block creation.

The test only verifies basic properties. Consider adding test cases for validation and error scenarios.

Enhance the test coverage:

 @Test
 void testCreateBlocks() {
     BlockParam mockParam = new BlockParam();
     mockParam.setName("Test Block");
     mockParam.setLabel("test-block");
+    mockParam.setFramework("vue");
+    mockParam.setDescription("Test Description");
+    mockParam.setIsOfficial(false);
+    mockParam.setIsDefault(false);
+    mockParam.setGroups(Arrays.asList(1, 2));
+
     BlockDto mockData = new BlockDto();
     mockData.setName("Test Block");
     mockData.setLabel("test-block");
+    mockData.setFramework("vue");
+    mockData.setDescription("Test Description");
     when(blockService.createBlock(any(BlockParam.class))).thenReturn(Result.success(mockData));

     Result<BlockDto> result = blockController.createBlocks(mockParam);
     Assertions.assertEquals(mockData, result.getData());
     verify(blockService).createBlock(argThat(param ->
             param.getName().equals("Test Block") && 
             param.getLabel().equals("test-block") &&
+            param.getFramework().equals("vue") &&
+            param.getDescription().equals("Test Description") &&
+            !param.getIsOfficial() &&
+            !param.getIsDefault() &&
+            param.getGroups().containsAll(Arrays.asList(1, 2))
     ));
+    
+    // Test validation failure
+    BlockParam invalidParam = new BlockParam();
+    when(blockService.createBlock(invalidParam)).thenReturn(Result.failed("Validation failed"));
+    Result<BlockDto> invalidResult = blockController.createBlocks(invalidParam);
+    Assertions.assertFalse(invalidResult.isSuccess());
 }

195-207: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add test cases for block update validation.

The test should verify error handling and validation during block updates.

Enhance the test coverage:

 @Test
 void testUpdateBlocks() {
     BlockParam blockParam = new BlockParam();
     blockParam.setName("Updated Block");
+    blockParam.setId(0);
+    blockParam.setLabel("updated-block");
+    blockParam.setFramework("vue");
+    blockParam.setGroups(Arrays.asList(1, 2));
+
     BlockDto returnData = new BlockDto();
     returnData.setName("Updated Block");
     when(blockService.updateBlockById(any(BlockParam.class), anyInt())).thenReturn(Result.success(returnData));
     when(blockService.queryBlockById(anyInt())).thenReturn(returnData);

     Result<BlockDto> result = blockController.updateBlocks(blockParam, Integer.valueOf(0), Integer.valueOf(1));
     Assertions.assertEquals(returnData, result.getData());
     verify(blockService).updateBlockById(argThat(param ->
             param.getName().equals("Updated Block") &&
-                    param.getId().equals(0)
+                    param.getId().equals(0) &&
+                    param.getLabel().equals("updated-block") &&
+                    param.getFramework().equals("vue") &&
+                    param.getGroups().containsAll(Arrays.asList(1, 2))
     ), eq(1));
+    
+    // Test null ID validation
+    BlockParam invalidParam = new BlockParam();
+    when(blockService.updateBlockById(invalidParam, 1)).thenReturn(Result.failed("Invalid ID"));
+    Result<BlockDto> invalidResult = blockController.updateBlocks(invalidParam, null, 1);
+    Assertions.assertFalse(invalidResult.isSuccess());
 }
base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImplTest.java (1)

118-129: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add test cases for block creation validation.

The test should verify validation of required fields and error scenarios.

Enhance the test coverage:

 @Test
 void testCreateBlock() {
     when(blockMapper.createBlock(any())).thenReturn(1);
     BlockDto t = new BlockDto();
     t.setName("test");
     when(blockMapper.findBlockAndGroupAndHistoByBlockId(any())).thenReturn(t);
     BlockParam blockParam = new BlockParam();
     blockParam.setId(0);
     blockParam.setName("test");
     blockParam.setLabel("test-label");
     blockParam.setFramework("vue");
+    blockParam.setDescription("Test Description");
+    blockParam.setIsOfficial(false);
+    blockParam.setIsDefault(false);
+    blockParam.setGroups(Arrays.asList(1, 2));
+
     Result<BlockDto> result = blockServiceImpl.createBlock(blockParam);
     Assertions.assertEquals("test", result.getData().getName());
+    verify(blockMapper).createBlock(argThat(block ->
+        block.getName().equals("test") &&
+        block.getLabel().equals("test-label") &&
+        block.getFramework().equals("vue") &&
+        block.getDescription().equals("Test Description") &&
+        !block.getIsOfficial() &&
+        !block.getIsDefault()
+    ));
     
     // Test validation failure
     BlockParam invalidParam = new BlockParam();
     Result<BlockDto> invalidResult = blockServiceImpl.createBlock(invalidParam);
     Assertions.assertFalse(invalidResult.isSuccess());
+    
+    // Test duplicate label validation
+    when(blockMapper.queryBlockByCondition(any())).thenReturn(Arrays.asList(new Block()));
+    Result<BlockDto> duplicateResult = blockServiceImpl.createBlock(blockParam);
+    Assertions.assertFalse(duplicateResult.isSuccess());
 }
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockParam.java (1)

157-162: Enhance error handling in getPublic() method.

The method could be improved with more descriptive error messages and null handling.

Consider this enhancement:

 @JsonProperty("public")
 public Integer getPublic() {
+    if (this.publicStatus == null) {
+        return null;
+    }
     if (this.publicStatus != null && !Arrays.asList(0, 1, 2).contains(this.publicStatus)) {
-        throw new IllegalStateException("Invalid public status value: " + this.publicStatus);
+        throw new IllegalStateException(
+            String.format("Invalid public status value: %d. Expected values are: 0 (private), 1 (public), 2 (tenant)", 
+            this.publicStatus)
+        );
     }
     return this.publicStatus;
 }
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java (3)

96-97: Consider making constants configurable.

Hard-coded values should be moved to configuration.

Move these constants to configuration:

-    private static final int DEFAULT_PLATFORM_ID = 1;
-    private static final String DEFAULT_USER_ID = "1";
+    @Value("${block.default.platform-id}")
+    private int defaultPlatformId;
+    @Value("${block.default.user-id}")
+    private String defaultUserId;

158-165: Add logging for error scenarios.

The error handling could be improved with proper logging.

Add logging statements:

 public Result<BlockDto> updateBlockById(BlockParam blockParam, Integer appId) {
     if (blockParam == null || blockParam.getId() == null) {
+        log.error("Invalid block parameter: blockParam={}, appId={}", blockParam, appId);
         return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM002);
     }
     Block blockResult = blockMapper.queryBlockById(blockParam.getId());
     if (blockResult == null) {
+        log.error("Block not found: id={}", blockParam.getId());
         return Result.failed(ExceptionEnum.CM001);
     }

725-732: Add input validation to createBuildInfo method.

The method should validate its input parameters.

Add validation:

 private Map<String, Object> createBuildInfo(String version, LocalDateTime buildTime) {
+    if (version == null || buildTime == null) {
+        throw new IllegalArgumentException("Version and buildTime cannot be null");
+    }
+    if (!version.matches("^\\d+\\.\\d+\\.\\d+(-[a-zA-Z0-9]+)?$")) {
+        throw new IllegalArgumentException("Invalid version format. Expected: x.y.z or x.y.z-suffix");
+    }
     Map<String, Object> buildInfo = new HashMap<>();
     buildInfo.put("result", true);
     buildInfo.put("versions", Collections.singletonList(version));
     DateTimeFormatter formatter = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss");
     buildInfo.put("endTime", buildTime.format(formatter));
     return buildInfo;
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9c1225a and 8cc8ca5.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .github/workflows/checkstyle.yml (1 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockParam.java (1 hunks)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java (12 hunks)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/controller/BlockControllerTest.java (4 hunks)
  • base/src/test/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImplTest.java (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/checkstyle.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/model/dto/BlockParam.java (1)

31-41: LGTM! Well-documented class with clear purpose.

The class documentation clearly explains its role as a parameter object for block operations, working alongside BlockDto.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java (4)

96-97: Consider externalizing hardcoded constants.

These values should be configurable through application properties or environment variables to support different deployment environments and improve maintainability.

-    private static final int DEFAULT_PLATFORM_ID = 1;
-    private static final String DEFAULT_USER_ID = "1";
+    @Value("${app.default.platform-id}")
+    private int defaultPlatformId;
+    @Value("${app.default.user-id}")
+    private String defaultUserId;

189-204: Consider extracting group handling logic to a separate method.

The block group handling logic could be moved to a dedicated method to improve readability and maintainability.

+    private void deleteBlockGroups(Integer blockId, List<BlockGroup> blockGroups) {
+        if(blockGroups != null && !blockGroups.isEmpty()){
+            List<Integer> blockGroupIds = blockGroups.stream()
+                .map(BlockGroup::getId)
+                .collect(Collectors.toList());
+            for (Integer id : blockGroupIds) {
+                blockGroupBlockMapper.deleteByGroupIdAndBlockId(id, blockId);
+            }
+        }
+    }

702-703: Remove unnecessary semicolon.

There's a stray semicolon that should be removed.

-        List<Integer> groups = blockDto.getGroups().stream().map(BlockGroup::getId).collect(Collectors.toList());
-        ;
+        List<Integer> groups = blockDto.getGroups().stream().map(BlockGroup::getId).collect(Collectors.toList());

734-748: Consider making the date format configurable.

The date format pattern is hardcoded. Consider making it configurable through application properties to support different date format requirements.

+    @Value("${app.date-format.pattern:yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss}")
+    private String dateFormatPattern;

     private Map<String, Object> createBuildInfo(String version, LocalDateTime buildTime) {
         Map<String, Object> buildInfo = new HashMap<>();
         buildInfo.put("result", true);
         buildInfo.put("versions", Collections.singletonList(version));
-        DateTimeFormatter formatter = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss");
+        DateTimeFormatter formatter = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern(dateFormatPattern);
         buildInfo.put("endTime", buildTime.format(formatter));
         return buildInfo;
     }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8cc8ca5 and 4ba0818.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java (12 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
base/src/main/java/com/tinyengine/it/service/material/impl/BlockServiceImpl.java (1)

158-165: LGTM! Proper null checks added.

The null checks for blockParam and its ID are well implemented, with appropriate error handling.

@lu-yg lu-yg merged commit 8b8730a into opentiny:develop Feb 5, 2025
1 check passed
This was referenced Feb 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants