-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.8k
gh-104374: Remove access to class scopes for inlined comprehensions #104528
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3fad7b0
gh-104374: Remove access to class scopes for inlined comprehensions
JelleZijlstra fa11ca9
Update Lib/test/test_listcomps.py
JelleZijlstra 1d776fd
Remove unnecessary change
JelleZijlstra 932a2da
Better tests, copied from Carl's PR
JelleZijlstra d5653ae
A few more tests
JelleZijlstra ba3bacf
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into classcomp2
JelleZijlstra 948bc1a
fix definition of 'in a class block'
carljm 045478f
a couple more tests
carljm fc63272
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/main' into classcomp2
JelleZijlstra afe0277
A few more tests
JelleZijlstra File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be nice if we could test here that the name resolution in the inner listcomp here is right. I'll try to come up with some more tests around nested listcomps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you still planning to add more tests here, or improve this one?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, will push some more tests today or tomorrow. If you'd prefer to merge this now we can also do that; I can just write more tests in another PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I think if we get known fixes merged sooner it's easier to do more effective fuzz testing; if we find more issues we can fix them in separate PRs, and we can add more tests that we think of in separate PRs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just added two more tests and turned on automerge.