-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 396
Traducido c-api/structures #394
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
c-api/structures.po
Outdated
@@ -50,6 +59,14 @@ msgid "" | |||
"to a :c:type:`PyObject*`. Access to the members must be done by using the " | |||
"macros :c:macro:`Py_REFCNT` and :c:macro:`Py_TYPE`." | |||
msgstr "" | |||
"Todos los tipos de objetos son extensiones de este tipo. Este es un tipo que " | |||
"contiene la información de Python necesita para tratar un puntero a un " | |||
"objeto como un objeto. En una construcción normal \"liberación\", que " |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
aqui hay una traduccion literal que no está bien. normal "release" build es un "versión" normal. Quizá haya que buscar un adjetivo para diferenciar "release build" de otro tipo de builds.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Toda la razón, dejé de momento: En una construcción "*release*" normal.
Que te parece?
c-api/structures.po
Outdated
"Unos otros controles constantes si se carga un método en lugar de otra " | ||
"definición con el mismo nombre del método." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
esta frase no tiene sentido, hay que revisarla en su contexto
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
En otros controles constantes dependiendo si se carga un método en su lugar (*in place*) de otra definición con el mismo nombre del método.
Que te parece así?
He acabado la revisión, en general el único problema ha sido traduciones demasiado literales que producen frases no entendibles en español. |
Co-authored-by: Héctor Canto <hectorcanto@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👌
No description provided.