Skip to content

remove Travis CI settings #196

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 6, 2022
Merged

Conversation

ktdreyer
Copy link
Contributor

@ktdreyer ktdreyer commented Oct 4, 2021

Commit bea9e86 enabled GitHub Actions. Remove the .travis.yml configuration and point to GH Actions in the README instead.

@ktdreyer ktdreyer changed the title remove Travis CI settings DNM: remove Travis CI settings Oct 4, 2021
README.rst Outdated
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Resources
- `Code <http://github.com/kvesteri/validators/>`_


.. |Build Status| image:: https://travis-ci.org/kvesteri/validators.svg?branch=master
.. |Build Status| image:: https://github.com/kvesteri/validators/workflows/tests/badge.svg
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kvesteri We need you to enable GitHub Actions in the "settings" tab, and then we'll know the exact badge URL to use here.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The actions have been enabled

@ktdreyer ktdreyer changed the title DNM: remove Travis CI settings remove Travis CI settings Jun 5, 2022
Commit bea9e86 enabled GitHub Actions.
Remove the .travis.yml configuration and point to GH Actions in the
README instead.
@ktdreyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

ktdreyer commented Jun 5, 2022

Thanks, I've rebased this and it's ready to merge.

@kvesteri kvesteri merged commit 66726ef into python-validators:master Jun 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants