Skip to content

DOC improve n_jobs docs in CalibratedClassifierCV #18633

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

tnwei
Copy link
Contributor

@tnwei tnwei commented Oct 17, 2020

Reference Issues/PRs

Addresses part of #14228

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Updated docs to reflect meaning and usage of n_jobs in CalibratedClassifierCV

Any other comments?

#14228 is opened to improve / clarify the docs for n_jobs in the sklearn code base. This PR focuses is tailored to address sklearn/calibration.py, where the only function that contains n_jobs is CalibratedClassifierCV.

@tnwei tnwei marked this pull request as draft October 27, 2020 16:57
@tnwei tnwei marked this pull request as ready for review October 28, 2020 15:35
Copy link
Member

@adrinjalali adrinjalali left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @tnwei

Co-authored-by: Adrin Jalali <adrin.jalali@gmail.com>
@tnwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnwei commented Oct 28, 2020

Thanks for review @adrinjalali

thomasjpfan
thomasjpfan previously approved these changes Oct 29, 2020
Copy link
Member

@thomasjpfan thomasjpfan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@thomasjpfan thomasjpfan dismissed their stale review October 29, 2020 18:50

Looks like the documentation was already updated on master.

@adrinjalali
Copy link
Member

yep, this seems fixed on master already O_o.

@ogrisel
Copy link
Member

ogrisel commented Oct 30, 2020

Sorry, it was probably concurrently fixed in #17856 which refactored the class and improved the docs significantly for this estimator.

@tnwei
Copy link
Contributor Author

tnwei commented Oct 30, 2020

Only glad to see improvements to the codebase, thanks for your time gents!

@adrinjalali
Copy link
Member

Hope you sick around after October, always nice to see good new contributors!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants