-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
DOC improve n_jobs docs in CalibratedClassifierCV #18633
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @tnwei
Co-authored-by: Adrin Jalali <adrin.jalali@gmail.com>
Thanks for review @adrinjalali |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Looks like the documentation was already updated on master.
yep, this seems fixed on master already O_o. |
Sorry, it was probably concurrently fixed in #17856 which refactored the class and improved the docs significantly for this estimator. |
Only glad to see improvements to the codebase, thanks for your time gents! |
Hope you sick around after October, always nice to see good new contributors! |
Reference Issues/PRs
Addresses part of #14228
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Updated docs to reflect meaning and usage of
n_jobs
inCalibratedClassifierCV
Any other comments?
#14228 is opened to improve / clarify the docs for
n_jobs
in the sklearn code base. This PR focuses is tailored to addresssklearn/calibration.py
, where the only function that containsn_jobs
isCalibratedClassifierCV
.