-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
DOC convert to notebook style SVM C scaling example #21776
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@thomasjpfan @lesteve it should not be a controversial DOC merge. |
Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <thomasjpfan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <thomasjpfan@gmail.com>
…xample_improve_svm_c
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, this has the same message as the original example but in notebook style.
LGTM
Since this PR is hanging for one year out there and it only changes the style, I will merge it upon a single approval, as we do for trivial documentation changes. Thanks @thomasjpfan |
I was just making a review at the moment :') |
@ArturoAmorQ do not hesitate to open a new PR if you have further improvements. |
Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <thomasjpfan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <thomasjpfan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <thomasjpfan@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Thomas J. Fan <thomasjpfan@gmail.com>
Follow-up after reviewing an example that was speeding up the notebook.
I just modify the example to be more notebook-style since we already had some sections in the summary docstring. Now, this is better in included.
In addition, I used the
validation_curve
instead of the grid-search since we don't have that many examples and this is a perfect analysis to use it. I also usedpandas
to make the plotting a little bit more intuitive. In general, we have many fewer indentation levels now.