-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
DOC Release highlights 1.5 #29007
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC Release highlights 1.5 #29007
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good. Two little grammar comments
Co-authored-by: Tim Head <betatim@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <guillaume@probabl.ai>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only nitpicks. LGTM.
Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <guillaume@probabl.ai>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for putting this together. Mostly optional suggestions.
# <sphx_glr_auto_examples_model_selection_plot_cost_sensitive_learning.py>`. | ||
|
||
# %% | ||
# Performance improvements in PCA |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not actionable: I know we are a bit thin with big new things and this is one of them. But we did not list the newton-cholesky solver in 1.2 as a highlight.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should have promoted the newton-cholesky in 1.2.
If I put on my "developer relationships" hat on, I would add a new entry for newton-cholesky solver in the 1.2 highlights and link to it in the 1.5 highlights.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But we did not list the newton-cholesky solver in 1.2 as a highlight.
It could have but all the reviewers for the 1.2 highlights missed it, including me. That said there were already many entries in the 1.2 highlights and there's always a compromise to make.
I would add a new entry for newton-cholesky solver in the 1.2 highlights and link to it in the 1.5 highlights.
I don't think adding a new entry today in the 1.2 highlights is relevant. It's already not even accessible from the front page. I expect a very low traffic on this page now.
@scikit-learn/core-devs ping in case you want to have a look. |
Co-authored-by: Christian Lorentzen <lorentzen.ch@gmail.com>
Alright, let's merge to not delay the release. If we want to do something about #29007 (comment), we can still open a separate PR and backport in 1.5.X, it's just doc anyway. |
Co-authored-by: Tim Head <betatim@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <guillaume@probabl.ai> Co-authored-by: Christian Lorentzen <lorentzen.ch@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Head <betatim@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Lemaitre <guillaume@probabl.ai> Co-authored-by: Christian Lorentzen <lorentzen.ch@gmail.com>
No description provided.