-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.9k
DOC: Add from_predictions
example and other details to visualizations.rst
#30825
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The first 2 plots (that you didn't touch) do no show in the rendered doc: https://output.circle-artifacts.com/output/job/5e0cade1-0c1e-4276-9a7c-728c32f8ff27/artifacts/0/doc/visualizations.html but the new plot you add does. Is this just a CI thing where it doesn't run if it hasn't been changed...?
Looks good otherwise, just some nits
I see 3 plots on the created docs. Could you clarify what you mean please? @lucyleeow |
Nevermind I see 3 plots now. I guess it was just my browser? sorry! |
No need to be sorry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really like these changes. Thank you, @DeaMariaLeon! <3
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A couple of thoughts regarding this doc. I think there are more tricky stuff to explain about from_predictions
that are really not straightforward :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some nits and a question. Thank you!
Just a couple of comment more. @DeaMariaLeon could you resolve the comment from @lucyleeow that were addressed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just some nits.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just one comment otherwise LGTM.
One note, are all lines under 88 characters?
Yes.. (after your feedback). Thanks. |
Friendly ping @lucyleeow |
Changes done @lucyleeow |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM though not sure if worth a second review from @glemaitre after the changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It still looks good on my side.
Merging. Thanks @DeaMariaLeon and @lucyleeow
Reference Issues/PRs
Fixes #30767
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
I tried to address all the points in the issue, and clarify a bit more.
Any other comments?
I moved ln 37, 38: "Be aware that we could get
the predictions from the support vector machine and then use
from_predictions
instead of
from_estimator
." To the bottom, above the new example (written a bit differently).I can leave it untouched if you prefer of course.
WDYT? @lucyleeow @glemaitre