Skip to content

stm32wb: syscfg: fix split sections #624

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2021

Conversation

karlp
Copy link
Contributor

@karlp karlp commented Sep 8, 2021

Fixes: #473

Fixes the base address, and then for the registers after the split,
fixup their addresses manually.

Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson karlp@etactica.com

Is there really any need to specifically mark the VREFBUF as "reserved" within the syscfg block as discussed in #473? is that important? the memory map generated looks correct.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2021

Memory map comparison

karlp added a commit to etactica/stm32wb-hal that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2021
This is likely to be more maintained going forward.
Only changes are due to upstream renaming fields in the SVD to be more
standard across families, and to more closely match the RefManuals.

Depends on either stm32-rs/stm32-rs#624
or stm32-rs/stm32-rs#473
and then a new upstream pac release, so _this_ commit should change to
depend on those, but this shows what's needed and how, for preview.

Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@etactica.com>
adamgreig
adamgreig previously approved these changes Sep 8, 2021
Copy link
Member

@adamgreig adamgreig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, this looks like it should work fine.

bors merge

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Sep 8, 2021

Merge conflict.

@adamgreig
Copy link
Member

Ah, boo, looks like it conflicts with #623. Could you rebase please?

Fixes: stm32-rs#473

Fixes the base address, and then for the registers after the split,
fixup their addresses manually.

Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@etactica.com>
@karlp
Copy link
Contributor Author

karlp commented Sep 9, 2021

No problem, rebased. (They both were doing section renames)

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 9, 2021

Memory map comparison

Copy link
Member

@adamgreig adamgreig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

bors merge

@bors bors bot merged commit 1ff04d7 into stm32-rs:master Sep 9, 2021
@karlp karlp deleted the stm32wb-syscfg-only branch September 9, 2021 10:26
KirmTwinty pushed a commit to KirmTwinty/stm32wb-hal that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2024
This is likely to be more maintained going forward.
Only changes are due to upstream renaming fields in the SVD to be more
standard across families, and to more closely match the RefManuals.

Depends on either stm32-rs/stm32-rs#624
or stm32-rs/stm32-rs#473
and then a new upstream pac release, so _this_ commit should change to
depend on those, but this shows what's needed and how, for preview.

Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@etactica.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants