-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 244
stm32wb: syscfg: fix split sections #624
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
This is likely to be more maintained going forward. Only changes are due to upstream renaming fields in the SVD to be more standard across families, and to more closely match the RefManuals. Depends on either stm32-rs/stm32-rs#624 or stm32-rs/stm32-rs#473 and then a new upstream pac release, so _this_ commit should change to depend on those, but this shows what's needed and how, for preview. Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@etactica.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, this looks like it should work fine.
bors merge
Merge conflict. |
Ah, boo, looks like it conflicts with #623. Could you rebase please? |
Fixes: stm32-rs#473 Fixes the base address, and then for the registers after the split, fixup their addresses manually. Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@etactica.com>
c198705
to
32befe7
Compare
No problem, rebased. (They both were doing section renames) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
bors merge
This is likely to be more maintained going forward. Only changes are due to upstream renaming fields in the SVD to be more standard across families, and to more closely match the RefManuals. Depends on either stm32-rs/stm32-rs#624 or stm32-rs/stm32-rs#473 and then a new upstream pac release, so _this_ commit should change to depend on those, but this shows what's needed and how, for preview. Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@etactica.com>
Fixes: #473
Fixes the base address, and then for the registers after the split,
fixup their addresses manually.
Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson karlp@etactica.com
Is there really any need to specifically mark the VREFBUF as "reserved" within the syscfg block as discussed in #473? is that important? the memory map generated looks correct.