Skip to content

Issue #11489 Some CA and Es translations #11532

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Issue #11489 Some CA and Es translations #11532

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mmoreram
Copy link
Contributor

Q A
Fixed tickets part of #11489
License MIT
  • Added some translations in CA
  • Fixed some translations in ES

@mmoreram mmoreram changed the title Issue #11489 Issue #11489 Some CA and Es translations Jul 31, 2014
@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Jul 31, 2014

The translations from number 73 to 77 also need to be merged into 2.4.

@mmoreram
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hmm, okay, I redo the PR in the branch 2.4, ok?

* Added some translations in CA
* Fixed some translations in ES
@mmoreram mmoreram closed this Jul 31, 2014
@mmoreram
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR has been moved to #11533 ( PR to 2.4 )

@xabbuh
Copy link
Member

xabbuh commented Jul 31, 2014

Well, 78 was introduced in master. Best could be to split the translations into two pull requests I think.

@mmoreram
Copy link
Contributor Author

Okay.

@mmoreram
Copy link
Contributor Author

New PRs:

#11533 - Translation in Català of 72-77 and fixed some Spanish translations
#11534 - Translation in Català of 78

fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2014
This PR was merged into the 2.6-dev branch.

Discussion
----------

Issue #11489 Translated 78 in Català

Just 78 is created because 73 to 77 are in another PR to branch 2.4.

Commits
-------

88eac04 Issue #11532 Translated 78 in Català
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants