-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
[Form] fix tests added by #16886 #17988
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
HeahDude
commented
Mar 2, 2016
Q | A |
---|---|
Branch | 2.7+ |
Bug fix? | no |
New feature? | no |
BC breaks? | no |
Deprecations? | no |
Tests pass? | yes |
Fixed tickets | #16886 |
License | MIT |
Doc PR | - |
Feel free to close this one in favor of an alternative by @boite if any. |
Thanks @HeahDude I'll look these over and make sure they agree with some recent changes to the placeholder normalizer. |
Yes I've already changed some assertions to take that into account ;) |
👍 Good work @HeahDude. What was your reason for removing the final three tests in the single, expanded, required section? Status: Reviewed |
@boite Because when |
Note to merger : only 2.x branches. |
I suppose that if that code is unlikely to change then there's no harm in having removed the tests. |
Branches 2.7 and 2.8 only. |
yes, this precision was in the description ;) |
Thanks for this PR @HeahDude :) What about the failing tests in the PHP 7 build? |
@webmozart I know I still miss to understand. It's like the PHP 7 build of travis does not take into account commits of #17568 and #17973. Any lead ? |
@HeahDude That's because the tests use the form component from v2.7.10, which does not include the two PRs you mention. |
Thank you @HeahDude. |
This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch. Discussion ---------- [Form] fix tests added by #16886 | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Branch | 2.7+ | Bug fix? | no | New feature? | no | BC breaks? | no | Deprecations? | no | Tests pass? | yes | Fixed tickets | #16886 | License | MIT | Doc PR | - Commits ------- bd22c86 minor [Form] fix tests added by #16886
Thanks @fabpot for your explanation :) |