Skip to content

[Serializer] Experimental for ObjectListExtractor #30963

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

joelwurtz
Copy link
Contributor

Q A
Branch? master
Bug fix? no
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets #30904
License MIT
Doc PR -

Related to #30818

I want to mark this class as @expiremental until we have the full refactoring done of the Serializer, also this would allow change needed if some behavior was not correctly taken into care in 4.3

Mark also final for the default implementation as we don't want that to be extendable and user should use composition over inheritance.

Copy link
Member

@dunglas dunglas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When the typos will be fixed.

@joelwurtz joelwurtz force-pushed the feature/object-list-extractor-expiremental branch from b6df430 to b0cdf45 Compare April 7, 2019 12:24
@joelwurtz joelwurtz changed the title [Serializer] Expiremental for ObjectListExtractor [Serializer] Experimental for ObjectListExtractor Apr 7, 2019
@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member

Thank you @joelwurtz.

@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas merged commit b0cdf45 into symfony:master Apr 7, 2019
nicolas-grekas added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2019
…lwurtz)

This PR was merged into the 4.3-dev branch.

Discussion
----------

[Serializer] Experimental for ObjectListExtractor

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | master
| Bug fix?      | no
| New feature?  | no
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | #30904
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | -

Related to #30818

I want to mark this class as `@expiremental` until we have the full refactoring done of the Serializer, also this would allow change needed if some behavior was not correctly taken into care in 4.3

Mark also `final` for the default implementation as we don't want that to be extendable and user should use composition over inheritance.

Commits
-------

b0cdf45 Set object list extractor as expiremental, and use final for default implementation
@nicolas-grekas nicolas-grekas modified the milestones: next, 4.3 Apr 30, 2019
@fabpot fabpot mentioned this pull request May 9, 2019
@joelwurtz joelwurtz deleted the feature/object-list-extractor-expiremental branch August 14, 2023 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants