Skip to content

[OptionsResolver] added ability to allow extra options #7985

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[OptionsResolver] added ability to allow extra options #7985

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kbond
Copy link
Member

@kbond kbond commented May 9, 2013

Q A
Bug fix? no
New feature? yes
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets #7979
License MIT
Doc PR todo

@@ -54,6 +54,12 @@ class OptionsResolver implements OptionsResolverInterface
private $allowedTypes = array();

/**
* Whether to allow extra options
* @var bool
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in Symfony codebase/standard it's Boolean

@wouterj
Copy link
Member

wouterj commented May 9, 2013

This should get documented in components/options_reaolver

@kbond
Copy link
Member Author

kbond commented May 9, 2013

I will document it, I just wanted to see if this feature will be merged before I do.

@shouze
Copy link

shouze commented Aug 2, 2013

👍

1 similar comment
@stloyd
Copy link
Contributor

stloyd commented Aug 8, 2013

👍

@cordoval
Copy link
Contributor

cordoval commented Dec 6, 2013

ping @fabpot should we create the documentation ticket for hacking day or before?

would be good to know if this will be merged at least

@kbond
Copy link
Member Author

kbond commented Dec 6, 2013

when is the hack day? at SymfonyCon?

@cordoval
Copy link
Contributor

cordoval commented Dec 6, 2013

yeah online and in person options --> http://doodle.com/vycrabazihq926yq

@wouterj
Copy link
Member

wouterj commented Dec 6, 2013

@cordoval I prefer a PR and if not, just add an issue.

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Dec 27, 2013

Closing in favor of #9754

@fabpot fabpot closed this Dec 27, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants