[Process] Renamed flushOutput() and flushErrorOutput() to clearOutput() and clearErrorOutput() #9407
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I renamed
flushOutput()
andflushErrorOutput()
toclearOutput()
andclearErrorOutput()
since I find the current naming unintuitive. When reading the blog post about this feature I initially thought that the output would be flushed to the console (as inob_flush()
).Using "clear" on the other hand conforms well with our conventions.