-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
Made the code of a validation example more robust #9993
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
validation/custom_constraint.rst
Outdated
|
||
class ContainsAlphanumericValidator extends ConstraintValidator | ||
{ | ||
public function validate($value, Constraint $constraint) | ||
{ | ||
if (!is_string($value) && !(is_object($value) && method_exists($value, '__toString'))) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now that =I review this, I've got a comment :). If a constraint allows casting an object to null then it should do so for any scalar. What about changing is_string
to is_scalar
? I can see that it's done here for example https://github.com/symfony/symfony/blob/master/src/Symfony/Component/Validator/Constraints/EmailValidator.php#L77.
Also by convention; a constraint should not test empty value, for this a NotNull
or NotBlank
constraint should be used. So it misses:
if (null === $value || '' === $value) {
return;
}
at first.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I disagree with the proposed is_scalar()
change. Even the error message of the validator says: The string "{{ string }}" contains an illegal character ...
so this must only work with strings, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've added this:
if ('' === $value) {
return;
}
Should it contain a trim($value)
call too? Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, casting should be ok, it's about changing the representation to make it fit, then throw an exception if it's not possible. I think we should stay consistent, if we want to keep is_string
that strict, then let's remove the __toString()
check.
Trimming is not as it alters the given value. Fortunately this will soon be opt-in symfony/symfony#26484.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@HeahDude I made more changes according to your comments. Thanks for the reviews and for your patience 🙏
validation/custom_constraint.rst
Outdated
@@ -69,6 +69,10 @@ The validator class is also simple, and only has one required method ``validate( | |||
throw new UnexpectedTypeException($value, 'string'); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
if ('' === $value) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
null
must be check too.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But the null
value would never be checked. We throw an exception if !is_string()
above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check must be moved before indeed, and test null.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason is that the constraint should not throw or invalid empty values, or it would superseed other constraints responsibility.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your work on this!
validation/custom_constraint.rst
Outdated
|
||
class ContainsAlphanumericValidator extends ConstraintValidator | ||
{ | ||
public function validate($value, Constraint $constraint) | ||
{ | ||
if (null === $value || '' === $value) { | ||
return; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about adding a commented code line for putting the reason why we must do so?
Fixes #9979.