Skip to content

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter #10473

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

ronami
Copy link
Member

@ronami ronami commented Dec 7, 2024

PR Checklist

Overview

This PR addresses #10442 and handles a potential return type being a type constraint.

The PR suffers from the same issues around getConstrainedTypeAtLocation described by @kirkwaiblinger on #10438 and requires a small workaround.

Note that no-unnecessary-condition makes a lot of use of getConstrainedTypeAtLocation, but going over them roughly, I couldn't find additional bugs around unconstrained type parameters.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @ronami!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 7, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit ff59a13
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/67607a6b06fd6900082923c8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10473--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 100 (🟢 up 22 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 7, 2024

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit ff59a13. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution


✅ Successfully ran 2 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.80%. Comparing base (cb0ef9c) to head (ff59a13).
Report is 26 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10473      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.77%   86.80%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         444      445       +1     
  Lines       15335    15379      +44     
  Branches     4468     4481      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits        13307    13349      +42     
- Misses       1673     1675       +2     
  Partials      355      355              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 86.80% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...slint-plugin/src/rules/no-unnecessary-condition.ts 99.24% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️

... and 15 files with indirect coverage changes

@ronami ronami marked this pull request as ready for review December 7, 2024 18:30
@ronami ronami changed the title fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or v… fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter Dec 7, 2024
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Just requesting changes on a bit of cleanup for the older code.

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Dec 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Dec 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One last touchup, since you're humoring me 😄

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Dec 14, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Dec 15, 2024
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! I think this is ready if you are ✨

@ronami
Copy link
Member Author

ronami commented Dec 16, 2024

LGTM! I think this is ready if you are ✨

I think this is ready, it's a lot better thanks to your help! ❤️

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Dec 16, 2024
Copy link
Member

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

Bug is solved and the existing code is better for it, too.
yay

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 8ca9cba into typescript-eslint:main Dec 21, 2024
62 checks passed
@ronami ronami deleted the no-unnecessary-condition-dont-flag-unconstrained-or-valid-constraint branch December 21, 2024 14:51
renovate bot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     |
| ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.18.1 | 8.18.2 |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.18.1 | 8.18.2 |


## [v8.18.2](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8182-2024-12-23)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] handle noUncheckedIndexedAccess true ([#10514](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10514))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-assertions] allow default assertionStyle option ([#10512](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10512))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-arguments] handle type/value context ([#10503](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10503))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-type-assertion] fix for unsafe assertion to a constrained type parameter ([#10461](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10461))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid ([#10490](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10490))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter ([#10473](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10473))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-reduce-type-parameter] don't report cases in which the fix results in a type error ([#10494](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10494))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] not reporting usages of deprecated declared constants as object value ([#10498](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10498))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Luke Deen Taylor [@controversial](https://github.com/controversial)
-   Ronen Amiel
-   Scott O'Hara
-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)
-   Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
renovate bot added a commit to mmkal/eslint-plugin-mmkal that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
##### [v8.18.2](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8182-2024-12-23)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] handle noUncheckedIndexedAccess true ([#10514](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10514))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-assertions] allow default assertionStyle option ([#10512](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10512))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-arguments] handle type/value context ([#10503](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10503))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-type-assertion] fix for unsafe assertion to a constrained type parameter ([#10461](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10461))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid ([#10490](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10490))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter ([#10473](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10473))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-reduce-type-parameter] don't report cases in which the fix results in a type error ([#10494](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10494))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] not reporting usages of deprecated declared constants as object value ([#10498](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10498))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Luke Deen Taylor [@controversial](https://github.com/controversial)
-   Ronen Amiel
-   Scott O'Hara
-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)
-   Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 30, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter
3 participants