Skip to content

fix(eslint-plugin): [consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid #10490

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

ronami
Copy link
Member

@ronami ronami commented Dec 12, 2024

PR Checklist

Overview

This PR addresses #4730 and adjusts the rule so it uses a suggestion instead of an auto-fix if the change may create an invalid index signature.

Some thoughts:

Even if the rule uses a suggestion, it can still flag records that can't be fixed to a valid index signature. Developers may need to add eslint-disable comments for these these. As long as the rule isn't type aware, I think that's the best alternative.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @ronami!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 023265d
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/6761dae267708300089a5ff8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10490--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 98 (🟢 up 20 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Dec 12, 2024

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 023265d. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution


✅ Successfully ran 2 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

@ronami ronami marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2024 21:45
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.79%. Comparing base (a383d50) to head (023265d).
Report is 22 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10490      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.78%   86.79%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         445      445              
  Lines       15356    15369      +13     
  Branches     4472     4477       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits        13326    13339      +13     
  Misses       1675     1675              
  Partials      355      355              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 86.79% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...lugin/src/rules/consistent-indexed-object-style.ts 97.89% <100.00%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!

@Josh-Cena I was just thinking about #4730, it keeps coming up. This is great.

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Dec 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Haven't looked too closely, just dropped one drive-by question. Feel free to merge, no blockers from me

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg removed the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Dec 18, 2024
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 91e7217 into typescript-eslint:main Dec 21, 2024
63 of 64 checks passed
@ronami ronami deleted the consistent-indexed-object-style-change-auto-fix branch December 21, 2024 14:50
renovate bot added a commit to andrei-picus-tink/auto-renovate that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
| datasource | package                          | from   | to     |
| ---------- | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------ |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin | 8.18.1 | 8.18.2 |
| npm        | @typescript-eslint/parser        | 8.18.1 | 8.18.2 |


## [v8.18.2](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8182-2024-12-23)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] handle noUncheckedIndexedAccess true ([#10514](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10514))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-assertions] allow default assertionStyle option ([#10512](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10512))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-arguments] handle type/value context ([#10503](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10503))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-type-assertion] fix for unsafe assertion to a constrained type parameter ([#10461](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10461))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid ([#10490](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10490))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter ([#10473](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10473))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-reduce-type-parameter] don't report cases in which the fix results in a type error ([#10494](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10494))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] not reporting usages of deprecated declared constants as object value ([#10498](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10498))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Luke Deen Taylor [@controversial](https://github.com/controversial)
-   Ronen Amiel
-   Scott O'Hara
-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)
-   Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
renovate bot added a commit to mmkal/eslint-plugin-mmkal that referenced this pull request Dec 23, 2024
##### [v8.18.2](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/HEAD/packages/eslint-plugin/CHANGELOG.md#8182-2024-12-23)

##### 🩹 Fixes

-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] handle noUncheckedIndexedAccess true ([#10514](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10514))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-type-assertions] allow default assertionStyle option ([#10512](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10512))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-type-arguments] handle type/value context ([#10503](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10503))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unsafe-type-assertion] fix for unsafe assertion to a constrained type parameter ([#10461](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10461))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[consistent-indexed-object-style] use a suggestion over an auto-fix if can't reliably determine that produced index signature is valid ([#10490](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10490))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-unnecessary-condition] don't flag values of an unconstrained or valid type parameter ([#10473](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10473))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[prefer-reduce-type-parameter] don't report cases in which the fix results in a type error ([#10494](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10494))
-   **eslint-plugin:** \[no-deprecated] not reporting usages of deprecated declared constants as object value ([#10498](typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint#10498))

##### ❤️ Thank You

-   Luke Deen Taylor [@controversial](https://github.com/controversial)
-   Ronen Amiel
-   Scott O'Hara
-   YeonJuan [@yeonjuan](https://github.com/yeonjuan)
-   Yukihiro Hasegawa [@y-hsgw](https://github.com/y-hsgw)

You can read about our [versioning strategy](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/versioning) and [releases](https://main--typescript-eslint.netlify.app/users/releases) on our website.
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 30, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[consistent-indexed-object-style] fixer produces invalid code and deletes comments
3 participants