Skip to content

chore: don't clear TSServer Project Service between repo tests #7801

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

PR Checklist

Overview

createProjectService() has no parameters. So I'm hopeful it can just ... stick around between tests, regardless of what physical or virtual file system names they use? If not, we'll have to look into using its APIs to clear files...

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @JoshuaKGoldberg!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 20, 2023

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a40be77
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/6531e4afc5dd5e0008dbf015
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-7801--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 90 (🔴 down 5 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg marked this pull request as draft October 20, 2023 02:23
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg marked this pull request as ready for review October 20, 2023 12:28
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg requested review from bradzacher and removed request for bradzacher October 20, 2023 12:31
@@ -17,7 +14,6 @@ export function clearCaches(): void {
clearProgramCacheOriginal();
clearWatchCaches();
clearTSConfigMatchCache();
clearTSServerProjectService();
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Whoops, sorry for the accidental tag (meant to re-draft). Looks like CI still takes quite a while. We'll need to investigate more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

29m 5s
Run npx nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false

> nx run eslint-plugin:test --coverage=false

 PASS  tests/rules/padding-line-between-statements.test.ts (20.724 s, 699 MB heap size)
 PASS  tests/rules/type-annotation-spacing.test.ts (16.747 s, 1151 MB heap size)
...

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 28, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Repo: Our EXPERIMENTAL_useProjectService unit tests are much slower in CI
1 participant