Skip to content

fix(eslint-plugin): [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] combine template literal check with const variable check #8820

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

abrahamguo
Copy link
Contributor

@abrahamguo abrahamguo commented Apr 2, 2024

PR Checklist

Overview

In #8740, new logic was added for template literals. This logic was wrongly added as a precondition, when it needs to be combined with the existing const variable declaration logic.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @abrahamguo!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d8f2fe7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/660b661027b6d80008511550
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-8820--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 92 (🟢 up 1 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@abrahamguo abrahamguo marked this pull request as draft April 2, 2024 01:29
@abrahamguo abrahamguo marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2024 01:34
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.37%. Comparing base (a14ba9d) to head (d8f2fe7).
Report is 108 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8820      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   88.02%   87.37%   -0.65%     
==========================================
  Files         405      255     -150     
  Lines       14089    12510    -1579     
  Branches     4125     3927     -198     
==========================================
- Hits        12402    10931    -1471     
+ Misses       1382     1304      -78     
+ Partials      305      275      -30     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 87.37% <100.00%> (-0.65%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
...-plugin/src/rules/no-unnecessary-type-assertion.ts 97.53% <100.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

... and 150 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! Leaving in 1 approval in case anyone else has time to review.

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label May 26, 2024
@bradzacher bradzacher merged commit 0d2e7ea into typescript-eslint:main May 28, 2024
67 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 10, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [no-unnecessary-type-assertion] (regression) false positives on template literals with no expressions
3 participants