Skip to content

fix(rule-tester): provide Linter a cwd in its constructor #9678

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg commented Jul 30, 2024

PR Checklist

Overview

Per #9676 (comment), uses the more friendly Linter cwd constructor param instead of working around ESLint's internals.

I see this PR as finishing what #9603 started & should have finished: fully embracing the new "flat" Linter's paradigm of setting the cwd from the beginning.

💖

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @JoshuaKGoldberg!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 09c739c
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/66a9388ef1fbda0008af5755
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-9678--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 97 (🔴 down 1 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 90 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Jul 30, 2024

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 09c739c. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution


✅ Successfully ran 2 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg marked this pull request as draft July 30, 2024 17:37
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2024 19:16
Copy link
Member

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not very familiar with this area, but looks reasonable enough to me 👍

@@ -917,6 +915,7 @@ export class RuleTester extends TestFramework {

const hasMessageOfThisRule = messages.some(m => m.ruleId === ruleName);

// console.log({ messages });
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// console.log({ messages });

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oop will do this on the branch

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger added the 1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge label Jul 30, 2024
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit b8274d3 into typescript-eslint:v8 Jul 31, 2024
61 of 62 checks passed
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg deleted the rule-tester-direct-cwd branch July 31, 2024 15:17
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 8, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
1 approval >=1 team member has approved this PR; we're now leaving it open for more reviews before we merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants