Skip to content

feat(eslint-plugin): [no-misused-promises] check array predicate return #9955

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 16, 2024

Conversation

yeonjuan
Copy link
Contributor

@yeonjuan yeonjuan commented Sep 9, 2024

PR Checklist

Overview

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @yeonjuan!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 9f161d4
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/66e737a35005350008fa2bb8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-9955--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 99 (🟢 up 4 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 90 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.69%. Comparing base (ef3384e) to head (9f161d4).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9955      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.67%   88.69%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         425      426       +1     
  Lines       14799    14820      +21     
  Branches     4304     4310       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        13123    13144      +21     
  Misses       1533     1533              
  Partials      143      143              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 88.69% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ges/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-misused-promises.ts 98.81% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
...slint-plugin/src/rules/no-unnecessary-condition.ts 99.51% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
...-plugin/src/util/isArrayMethodCallWithPredicate.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Comment on lines 25 to 26
node.callee.property.type === AST_NODE_TYPES.Identifier &&
ARRAY_PREDICATE_FUNCTIONS.has(node.callee.property.name)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
node.callee.property.type === AST_NODE_TYPES.Identifier &&
ARRAY_PREDICATE_FUNCTIONS.has(node.callee.property.name)
ARRAY_PREDICATE_FUNCTIONS.has(getStaticMemberAccessValue(node.callee))

[Refactor] Now that #9836 is already merged, we can use a nice utility function for this!

Comment on lines 30 to 32
return tsutils
.typeParts(type)
.some(t => checker.isArrayType(t) || checker.isTupleType(t));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[Bug] I think we should use unionTypeParts and intersectionTypeParts here, because the rule doesn't report on this code:

declare const array: (string[] & {foo: 'bar'}) | (number[] & {bar: 'foo'})
array.every(() => Promise.resolve(true));

playground

@auvred auvred added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Sep 14, 2024
@yeonjuan yeonjuan requested a review from auvred September 15, 2024 19:45
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Sep 15, 2024
@yeonjuan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@auvred Thanks 👍 9f161d4

Copy link
Member

@auvred auvred left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool!

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love being reminded about the array hardcodings 😄

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 454d37e into typescript-eslint:main Sep 16, 2024
63 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 25, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bug: [no-misused-promises] 'checksConditionals' should check array predicate return
3 participants