2012 Missouri gubernatorial election
|
← 2008 |
November 6, 2012 (2012-11-06) |
2016 → |
|
|
250px
County results
Nixon: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70% 80–90%
Spence: 40–50% 50–60% 60–70%
|
|
Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found. The 2012 Missouri gubernatorial election was held on November 6, 2012, to elect the Governor of Missouri. Incumbent Democratic Governor Jay Nixon won re-election against the Republican nominee, businessman Dave Spence.
Democratic primary
Candidates
Results
The Democratic primary was held on August 8, 2012.
Democratic primary results |
Party |
Candidate |
Votes |
% |
|
Democratic |
Jay Nixon (incumbent) |
269,865 |
86.0% |
|
Democratic |
William Campbell |
25,721 |
8.2% |
|
Democratic |
Clay Thunderhawk |
18,228 |
5.8% |
Total votes |
313,814 |
100.0% |
Republican primary
Candidates
- Bill Randles, businessman and corporate defense lawyer[3]
- Fred Sauer, investment executive and pro-life activist[1]
- Dave Spence, businessman[1]
- John Weiler[1]
Polling
Poll source |
Date(s) administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Bill
Randles |
Fred
Sauer |
Dave
Spence |
John
Weiler |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
August 4–5, 2012 |
590 |
± 4.0% |
15% |
12% |
42% |
3% |
29% |
Mason-Dixon |
July 23–25, 2012 |
400 |
± 5.0% |
15% |
1% |
41% |
3% |
40% |
Public Policy Polling |
May 24–27, 2012 |
430 |
± 4.7% |
11% |
4% |
32% |
1% |
43% |
Public Policy Polling |
January 27–29, 2012 |
574 |
± 4.1% |
15% |
— |
11% |
— |
74% |
Results
Republican primary results |
Party |
Candidate |
Votes |
% |
|
Republican |
Dave Spence |
333,578 |
59.9% |
|
Republican |
Bill Randles |
90,651 |
16.3% |
|
Republican |
Fred Sauer |
83,695 |
15.0% |
|
Republican |
John Weiler |
49,006 |
8.8% |
Total votes |
556,930 |
100.0% |
Libertarian primary
Candidates
Declined
Results
Libertarian primary results |
Party |
Candidate |
Votes |
% |
|
Libertarian |
Jim Higgins |
2,500 |
100.0% |
Total votes |
2,500 |
100.0% |
General election
Debates
Predictions
Polling
Poll source |
Date(s) administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Jay
Nixon (D) |
Dave
Spence (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
November 2–3, 2012 |
835 |
± 3.4% |
53% |
45% |
— |
2% |
SurveyUSA |
October 28–November 3, 2012 |
589 |
± 4.1% |
48% |
39% |
5% |
8% |
Mason-Dixon |
October 23–25, 2012 |
625 |
± 4% |
48% |
42% |
— |
9% |
Public Policy Polling |
October 19–21, 2012 |
582 |
± 4.1% |
51% |
40% |
— |
8% |
Public Policy Polling |
October 1–3, 2012 |
700 |
± 3.7% |
54% |
35% |
— |
12% |
Public Policy Polling |
August 20, 2012 |
500 |
± 4.4% |
46% |
37% |
— |
16% |
Survey USA |
August 9–12, 2012 |
585 |
± 4.1% |
51% |
37% |
5% |
6% |
Chilenski Strategies |
August 8, 2012 |
663 |
± 3.8% |
53% |
39% |
— |
9% |
Mason-Dixon |
July 23–25, 2012 |
625 |
± 4.0% |
48% |
39% |
— |
13% |
Public Policy Polling |
May 24–27, 2012 |
602 |
± 4.0% |
45% |
34% |
— |
21% |
Public Policy Polling |
January 27–29, 2012 |
582 |
± 4.1% |
47% |
27% |
— |
26% |
Hypothetical polling
|
- Republican primary
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Peter
Kinder |
Bill
Randles |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
September 9–12, 2011 |
400 |
± 4.9% |
34% |
14% |
53% |
Poll source |
Date(s)
administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Peter
Kinder |
Someone
else |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
September 9–12, 2011 |
400 |
± 4.9% |
22% |
35% |
43% |
- General election
Poll source |
Date(s) administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Jay
Nixon (D) |
Matt
Blunt (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
September 9–12, 2011 |
632 |
± 3.9% |
50% |
37% |
— |
13% |
Public Policy Polling |
April 28-May 1, 2011 |
555 |
± 3.9% |
48% |
38% |
— |
13% |
Poll source |
Date(s) administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Jay
Nixon (D) |
John
Danforth (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
September 9–12, 2011 |
632 |
± 3.9% |
39% |
45% |
— |
17% |
Poll source |
Date(s) administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Jay
Nixon (D) |
Kenny
Hulshof (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
April 28-May 1, 2011 |
555 |
± 3.9% |
51% |
34% |
— |
15% |
Poll source |
Date(s) administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Jay
Nixon (D) |
Sarah
Steelman (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
Nov. 29-December 1, 2010 |
515 |
± 4.3% |
46% |
35% |
— |
19% |
Poll source |
Date(s) administered |
Sample
size |
Margin of
error |
Jay
Nixon (D) |
Jim
Talent (R) |
Other |
Undecided |
Public Policy Polling |
September 9–12, 2011 |
632 |
± 3.9% |
47% |
38% |
— |
14% |
|
Results
Nixon won with a comfortable margin, even though it was a little closer than his 2008 victory. Even with President Barack Obama losing the state by a nine-point margin, Nixon and Senator Claire McCaskill both won reelection easily. Nixon, like McCaskill was able to get a huge number of votes from rural areas. Both Nixon and McCaskill were declared the winners of their respective races, even before the known Democratic strongholds of St. Louis, and Kansas City came in.
See also
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ Lua error in package.lua at line 80: module 'strict' not found.
- ↑ https://enrarchives.sos.mo.gov/enrnet/default.aspx?eid=750002497
External links
- Elections from the Missouri Secretary of State
- Campaign sites (Archived)