"Someone"의 정의와 사용법 및 예문에 관한 질문

A: It means that this person hopes that someone loves you so much that you become someone's dream .
This person is trying to say that maybe to someone you may be their dream

A: Yes, choosing for someone is when you make a choice on someone’s behalf. :)

A: Because stones in a gallbladder cannot be a result of an abdominal pain, on the contrary, pain is a symptom of stones.

A: to "put out" means to have sex.
so putting out for someone means to have sex with them.

A: They are making a joke out of McDonald's habit of putting "Mc" in front of their product names, like "McNuggets", "McFlurries", and "McRib". It is a mocking joke about their naming conventions.

A: You can say “excuse me”, “wait”, or something like “sorry for interrupting, but...”. “Excuse me” is very formal. “Wait” is not. “Sorry for interrupting” isn’t really formal or informal and can be said either before or after interrupting. But if you do want to make that phrase formal you can say “I apologize for interrupting”. You can combine some of these phrases as well.

It’s also pretty common to just begin speaking without acknowledging that you’re interrupting, but some people might think that’s rude. It really just depends on who you’re speaking to and the flow of conversation. If you notice other people interrupting without giving apologies, that might mean it’s okay for you to do it too. But if you’re unsure, apologizing or acknowledging that you’re about to interrupt is always safe. And you can even say something like “I didn’t mean to interrupt you. Please continue with what you were saying before” afterwards to show that you’re interested in what the other person was talking about.

A: When you “take someone up on that” you are usually accepting someone’s offer of assistance not the actual assistance.

For example:
Person A: “If you ever need help with your math homework, let me know.”

Person B: “ I may take you up on that!”
This implies that you will accept someone’s offer for assistance.

If someone gives you a suggestion or advice and you plan on taking it, you wouldn’t necessarily use the phrase “take you up on that” because you’re not taking someone up on their offer to act, you’re taking the advice directly. The advice itself isn’t the thing someone is taking you up on, it’s the act of giving it.

Example:
Person A: “I would suggest you use a different font before sending out that email.”
Person B: “Good idea, I’ll do that.”
Here person A is giving advice.

Example:
Person A: “Let me know if you need any advice before sending out that email.”
Person B: “Thanks, I’ll take you up on that.”
Here person B is taking up the offer, not the actual advice.

A:

Could I prevail on you for a light?

It is strange how he is always prevailing on people for directions – doesn't he know how to use Google Maps?

The Book of Job is basically God prevailing upon some poor sucker to settle a bet between him and the devil.

The dictates of our religion prevail upon us to treat all life with respect

A: もちろん指示じゃなくなるけど、
・If I see someone without a smile, I'll give them mine.
・If I see someone without a smile, I have to remember to give them mine.

A: じっと見ることです。
He is staring at him.
He stares over the ocean.
He was staring into space.
He stares out the window.

A: To give up on someone means to stop supporting them because you think they are not trying to improve themselves or their situation. You feel as though you can’t support them any more because you are getting tired of them not doing enough.

To abandon someone means to leave them without support.

A: The sentences have the same meaning since the verb tense change isn't very different here.

However, the second describes music as something you can find relief in more than once. Maybe multiple times, or continually.

The first sentence only says that it's possible to find relief in music.

The reason it's not very different is because of the word "could". Since it's hypothetical, we don't have to be so precise about how someone is able to do something, or what it has to be like.

A: The difference between "I need someone to help me" and "I need someone who helps me" lies in the way they express the need for assistance. Here are example sentences to illustrate their distinctions:

1. I need someone to help me:
- I'm overwhelmed with this project. I need someone to help me finish it.
- Can you find someone to help me move the furniture?

"When we say 'I need someone to help me,' it indicates a general need for assistance or support. The emphasis is on finding a person who can provide help or aid in completing a task or solving a problem."

2. I need someone who helps me:
- I need a roommate who helps me with household chores.
- I'm looking for a tutor who helps me improve my math skills.

"'I need someone who helps me' specifies the requirement for a person who already possesses the quality of being helpful or provides ongoing assistance in a particular area. It implies a preference for someone with a consistent or habitual behavior of helping."

The first sentence construction, "I need someone to help me," expresses the need for assistance without specifying the characteristics or qualities of the person. It focuses on the action of helping itself. The second sentence construction, "I need someone who helps me," specifies the need for a person with a particular quality or behavior of providing help.

In summary, "I need someone to help me" indicates a general need for assistance, while "I need someone who helps me" specifies the requirement for a person with a specific quality or habitual behavior of helping. The choice between the two depends on whether you want to emphasize the action of helping or the characteristics of the person providing help.

A: It's not that one is more natural. They would be used for different reasons.

The 1st is JUST a hypothetical.

Such as...
I wouldn't go out with her even if she paid me.
He wouldn't go even if she begged.

^^^ These statements have no relationship to real world events. They are just conceptual situations.

The 2nd type is a more concrete "if then" statement.

If you show up here again, you'll be sorry.
If he doesn't get his act together, I'm going to dump him.

It's talking about possible events in the future. There's a chance they could actually happen.

I hope it makes sense. I'm finding it hard to find the clear words to explain it. :/

A: The first option is incorrect. You have to include the preposition “on”.

A: ok. I'm not sure what the classroom atmosphere is like in Korea, but if a student was sitting in the teacher's seat in the US, I think the teacher would show how annoyed he/she is and would probably say "John(students name), Get out of my seat and go sit down in your own chair now."

A: very good question, as I have paused at this very same dilemma when responding by text. but yes, the sentiment is still appropriate when responding by text, even though you're reading of the bad news, and not actually hearing.

A: 답변을 보려면 질문을 살펴보세요

A: It's great. The only changes I would make would be:

1. Change "16th to 18th December" to "December 16th to 18th". The way you wrote it is OK, but this is more natural.

2. You can remove "I hope this email finds you well." That is not needed in an official letter like this. However, it does show politeness. So if you want to be extremely polite, you can keep that sentence in the letter.

A: It would be 'you too'.

Basically if you were to answer in full you'd say 'I love you too' but as it's usually shortened, it would me 'you too'

A: You respect one another. Does your partner treat you as their equal? Are they willing to listen to you, value your opinions, and accept your differences? If your partner truly respects you, they won’t ever try to control you or make your decisions for you because they know that you are your own person. And they trust your judgement and your capabilities. Respect is an ingredient for any strong and healthy relationship. True love can never flourish if there is no respect because it is the glue that holds relationships together. Respect is what makes you feel free and allows you to express yourself.

A: Here you go:

"Does it feel like your partner understands you, in a way that no one else ever has?

Do you feel like a pair of good friends who know how to make each other laugh, comfort one another and cheer each other up, when having a bad day?

Understanding is something, that can only come from having a true emotional connection with someone, which is why it's so vital to making a relationship work;

They see the real you, and accept you for who you truly are. They love all the things that make you so special and never once judge you for your flaws or past mistakes."

A: Are you wondering if you've really fallen for the right person? Do you want to know if what you're feeling is actually the real deal? You think the passionate feelings you have for someone will last forever. But all too often, you find yourself suddenly falling out of love and feeling disenchanted with them for reasons you may never fully understand. True love is about so much more than just chasing that fleeting, fairytale feeling. Here are eight definitive signs of true love.

A: my brain hurts every time I read that phrase... so really, I can't find a different way to put any of its words, it's so very confusing 😵‍💫
I would write it like this
"Network spirituality critiques all forms of network religion, asserting that spirituality, in its original and authentic form, is naturally angelic and exists as a process of return".
So no "that" here.

A: Yes but it would be an unusual way to say it, most of the time.
If you say "downright scared" it sounds like you are trying to emulate older literature, or trying to emulate southern, country speak.
If that is what you are going for, then it's fine.
Otherwise it will probably sound unintentionally funny.