Didn’t really find anything funny except a slight chuckle at maybe one offhand joke. I go on to rag on this film, but I had a decent time. The rating is about as perfect as it can get. Middle of the road, okay experience. Given the runtime, it lacks a rewatch factor for me of something like a true 90 minute comedy. So uhhh, these are my mostly negative thoughts on the hopefully only viewing I have of this okay…
Favorite films
Recent activity
AllRecent reviews
More-
-
Phantom Thread 2017
8.7/10 - A House that Never Changes is a Dead House.
What a surprise of a work from PTA. I believe almost every director has that film that stands out in stark contrast in either a small or large way in their filmography. It may not be their “best”, but it’s got an air of such mature vulnerability.
For Nolan, I think it’s Interstellar. For Bergman, I’d say it was Fanny and Alexander or Wild Strawberries, for Tarkovsky, Nostalgia, and…
Translated from by
Popular reviews
More-
Wolf Man 2025
Early Screening 🤑
Scattered breadcrumbs of really cool things that are mainly plot moments, and most of those effects moments, with a really nice score, some cool cinematography at times, interesting concepts, but abysmal script.
This is Smile for werewolves, complete with a very hamfisted analogy / allegory, and dogshit dialogue.
The effects are, however, amazing. Like actually amazing. I’m 0-2 on early screenings so far (the last one we got absolutely fucked on the seats), but I had a fun…
Translated from by -
The Dark Knight 2008
7.8/10 - TLDR There is a universe where justice was served and instead of making three Batman films, Nolan makes a fire Iron Man Trilogy.
Key points because I yap:1.) Nolan is more interested in science than the macabre or fantastical, which is inherently tied within the world of Batman and DC as a whole. His interest in technology and science would’ve serviced a Marvel superhero film way better, and in particular, Iron Man, which this film feels like…
Translated from by