The movie does a fantastic job of exploring a truly interesting, and for me unique, gray area in the discussion of Law and justice. I do wish the movie set up a better premise for the crime, as without any of the extenuating circumstances, it is unreasonable to find the defendant guilty. I'm not saying no jury would (in fact, most probably would) but in regards to the concept of reasonable doubt, the prosecution doesn't seem to have a good case.

Not terrible, not good. A collection of movie and TV references, but entertaining. Seems obvious they want to make like 7 of these. Studebaker is easily the best part of this movie.

Oddly, I think this would have been a great movie to end a trilogy or something. As it was, it had a sense of familiarity with no familiarity.

I get why so many people mentioned the glasses, but if we are pointing out issues . . . There are two step threes.

There are some very bright spots. But not bright enough.