September 2018—now
Favorite films
Recent activity
AllRecent reviews
More-
Mickey 17 2025
– Robert Pattinson‘s jiggly ass /10
– This film shows once again that Hollywood, even without the Hays Code, is still incapable of making truly good films. The only thing coming out of this godforsaken hell hole are scripts written, rewritten, directed and censored by market dynamics and profit requirements. The potential sex scenes involving two Robert Pattinsons were limitless – dare I say, utopian. This could have been, perhaps, the greatest film ever made ... yes, there are seedlings…Translated from by -
Living Stones 2025
— character psychology was a mistake and so was film school, apparently.
Translated from by
Popular reviews
More-
Unrest 2022
- Unrueh constitutes a truly magnificent example of decentralised historiography. There are no protagonists, in the classical sense. If anything, the town, it’s factories and the many people living and working within it constitute what you could call a collective protagonism (if you were pretentious). In the Q&A Schäublin mentioned their debates regarding the question of how to represent history. The answer to which they came and which let to this approach: it’s impossible. Capital-H-History ultimately is the marginalisation of certain facts…
Translated from by -
Grand Jete 2022
— A tale of mother and son, either too far or too close, unable to strike a healthy balance.
— Unfair. This has everything I love in film (explicit incest sex scenes).
— Telling more by showing less. A lot of shots in the film only show parts of bodies: backs, hands, penises. By leaving semantic gaps, the film allows for a great degree of polysemy. The viewer is left to extrapolate a body, a movement, a person from those small segments or semantic anchors.
— Pimples. Redness. Blemishes. In long, uninterrupted closeups. Very physical.Translated from by