While I did enjoy the acting performances of the main character and Zoey, the plot is so random and so illogical that it's incredible anyone likes this movie. The songs are some of the worst songs ever written and are absolutely shamefully terrible. They lend nothing (or worse) to the movie. The songs Howard Stern writes mocking musicals are better. If this movie had no music in it whatsoever and they changed the plot line a little bit, the concept…

The absolutely horrible critics review scores for this movie are one of the most puzzling things I have ever seen. Maybe it's because I read the book and absolutely loved it and most of the viewers didn't read the book or that they just wanted something more graphic and descriptive or a better murder mystery with alternative possibilities? Whatever the reason, I think that most viewers, whether you've read the book or not, can completely ignore the horrible critic reviews…

I just don't understand the excitement for this collection of short 'movies'. It was visually interesting in its presentation and set, although what a waste of 4K Dolby Vision with it's retro 70's look and grainy cinematography. The stories are pure RD, yet simply don't translate into an entertaining short movie. Creative yes, interesting to watch, not at all. It was really like an audio book with an odd stage presentation visually depicting things as the narrator reads...on 3X speed.…

Anatomy of a Fall 'falls' into a category of film we get most years when thinking of the Academy Awards. It's beautifully filmed, edited, acted, artful, and with an interesting plot, but still isn't quite compelling enough to be considered a brilliant film. While I enjoyed this movie, it never grabs you in a meaningful way to get over the hump. The actor who plays the son with low vision because of an accident does a fantastic job of acting…