Why did I think this was pretty good back when I first saw it? The graphics were awful and the story pretty boring. The acting was not great and overall this movie was just not good. In my defense, however, I was like 15 at the time and there have been better versions of this story told since then.
Favorite films
Recent activity
AllRecent reviews
More-
-
2012 2009
Noah's Ark 2009 was wild. . . Not a bad movie but probably about an hour too long. Disaster movies, for me, are typically pretty flat and uninteresting and this one isn't much different. Things explode, stuff breaks, main characters have convenient near death experiences, all to reach an inevitable conclusion where everyone, through introspection decides to do better and appreciate each other more. Also, it's always amazing how much people can get accomplished in 60 seconds before disaster hits.…
Translated from by
Popular reviews
More-
Scarface 1983
I checked this out in my journey to watch films that everyone needs to see at least once. At this point I can say I've watched it and I'm glad for that. That's as far as I can go with gladness for this film.
As something that has influenced a culture I can give credit where credit is due. Tony Montana is presented by Pacino as an influential character that you will always remember but it comes across as more…
Translated from by -
Spartacus 1960
Probably one of the more enjoyable Kurbrick films for me. The acting was pretty good for it's time even if many of the scenes were slow and clumsy. The overall story was pretty inspiring and well done but what makes it tough is the length at 3 1/4 hours. Overall it's worth a watch at least once if you've got some time to kill on a rainy afternoon.
Translated from by
