Questions about example sentences with, and the definition and usage of "Cycling"

A: This is a comparison to a mathematics equation that might look something like this:
“need transportation to work” + “need willpower to do exercise” = “things I should do everyday”
—If you get exercise by cycling to work, then there is no additional willpower required (it is removed from the equation)

A: All are sports squash is a british sport. Im not sure if windsurfing is american. Darts i wouldnt say is a sport but rather an activity. But all the other ones are sports in america! :)

A: yep :)

A: If a cyclist is tearing up the cycling track, then it means they are very, very fast. This is a hyperbole; they are going so fast that they are causing damage to the track (not really).

If the city (government) is tearing up the track, then they are removing/demolishing it.

A: There is no difference in meaning.
The first seems to emphasise that you went cycling, not the distance.
The second emphasises the distance.

A: @PiotrKowalPoland both have the same meaning

A: they mean the same thing! 'unskilled' and 'inept' can be classified as synonyms. :)

A: there is no real difference. "Biking" is most commonly used. "Bicycling" is more formal.

At gyms here in the USA there are "cycling" classes - which means stationary (not moving) bikes in a room with an instructor. "Spinning" or "spin class" is a copyrighted name for a "cycling" class.

A:

It’s fine. Everybody will understand what you mean.

Most modern people would say something like – who is entitled to the free cycling courses?

“Whom” is pretty much officially a dying word. Various constructions of – who – have been replacing it for decades.

A: thanks a lot!

A: That sentence does not make sense.

maybe they meant to write: you've been cycling on your own for ages.

This could mean:
- you have a lot of experience cycling.
- you have been cycling for a long time, and that is why you are good at cycling.

However, it really depends on the context of the situation/conversation.

A: "I was very tired, so I went cycling for 60 minutes. My family loves cycling."

A: × I often join a virtual cycling race for trinig, but if I do it in night, I can't fall asleep.
✓ I often join a virtual cycling race for training, but if I do it at night then I can't fall asleep.

A: × I like cycling, but I don't like cleaning bikes very muck.
✓ I like cycling, but I don't like cleaning bikes very much.

× However, it's necessary to do that to keep bikes working well.
✓ However, it's necessary to do that to keep the bikes working well.

A: @kinesis Yes! But at the same time using two "it"s that refer to two things in the same sentence can sound too repetitive.

It's really just a matter of preference though, since using "the trail" and your original sentence both make sense 😄

A: × It's said that cycling on trails right after the rain can damage the condition of them, so you should refrain.
✓ It's said that cycling on trails right after the rain can damage them. To preserve their condition avoid riding on them after the rain.

what you wrote is fine. some suggestions to sound a bit more natural. avoid is more common than refrain. Even my suggested second sentence is a bit much. you could also make the second sentence as simple as "so don't do it!" in conversation.

A: I like riding my bike in nature も使われる