Corinne Squire
Professor of Social Sciences. Co-director, Association of Narrative Research and Practice. Research interests in HIV and citizenship, refugee education and politics, subjectivities and popular culture, narrative theory and methods.
Phone: +44 208 223 3000
Phone: +44 208 223 3000
less
Uploads
Books by Corinne Squire
people to live long and healthy lives. Today, when ARV treatment is more and more available to those who need it, and is in prospect for those who do not yet have access, the
two three-letter acronyms, HIV and ARV together, increasingly
of the pandemic. The book examines lives lived with HIV and ARVs in different national contexts, primarily the United Kingdom and South Africa, where I have conducted interviews
about HIV support with people living with HIV, since 1993 in the United Kingdom (most recently in 2011), and since 2001 in South Africa (most recently in 2012).
people to live long and healthy lives. Today, when ARV treatment is more and more available to those who need it, and is in prospect for those who do not yet have access, the
two three-letter acronyms, HIV and ARV together, increasingly
of the pandemic. The book examines lives lived with HIV and ARVs in different national contexts, primarily the United Kingdom and South Africa, where I have conducted interviews
about HIV support with people living with HIV, since 1993 in the United Kingdom (most recently in 2011), and since 2001 in South Africa (most recently in 2012).
Esin, C., Fathi, M., & Squire, C. (2014). Narrative analysis: The constructionist approach. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis. (pp. 203-217). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n14
Narrative analysis is an analytical method that accommodates a variety of approaches.
Through these approaches, social researchers explore how people story their lives.
This is also a process through which researchers understand the complexities of
personal and social relations. Narrative analysis provides the researcher with useful
tools to comprehend the diversity and the different levels involved in stories, rather
than treating those stories simply as coherent, natural and unified entities (Andrews et
al., 2004). It is this approach to narrative analysis, which we shall call the
constructionist approach to narrative analysis, that we aim to explain in the chapter
that follows.
organised by the London East Research Institute and the Centre for Narrative Research at the University of East London and supported by the Economic and Social Research Council. Public support for social research increasingly depends on its ability to deliver scientifically valid and reliable studies to guide policy and practice. The theoretical foundations of social research, however, seem to be in a critical state. Evidence generated by both qualitative and quantitative methods is more and more seen to be conflicting, open to many interpretations. The aim of the event was to bring together
qualitative researchers in the social sciences, many working in the field of narrative but also a number working with life history and auto/biography, discourse analysis, grounded theory, visual methods and ethnography, to discuss the theoretical foundations of qualitative social research. The discussions addressed narrative itself as an index case for methodological debate; methodological considerations
of objectivity and evidence, interpretation and context; appropriate levels of research focus and their
interactions; the role of dialogue between disciplines; and the interaction between social science and the wider environment of which it is a part. Questions such as: who and what is social research for, and whose voices does it represent? What are social researchers' and participants' interpretative
rights over their data and each other? How does thick description and the rich social interpretation it affords relate to the need for precise methods of explanation and generalizable conclusions? What special problems of research design or delivery arise when attempts are made to "empower"
informants, to enable them to interrogate, and even co-construct the research story?, were addressed
throughout the discussion.