Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Mythology Chapter_Aritra Basu

2023, Sarup Books

Updendrakishore Rachanabali (Complete works of Upendrakishore) has two works entitled “Cheleder Ramayana” and “Cheleder Mahabharata”, which translate to “Ramayana for boys” and “Mahabharata for boys” respectively. While it is true that the male readership of his time had a considerable majority, the problematic aspect of such nomenclature does not end there. In these summaries of the two Indian epics, Upendrakishore had given more space to the male characters in the tales, as compared to the equally important female characters. Though both these epics revolve around the female leads of Sita and Draupadi respectively, they were not the at the centre of narrative in either of these two tales. This paper attempts to understand the implications of such nomenclature in the present century, where the readership has been equally divided (arguably) between male and female readers. In continuation, the works of contemporary Indian authors like Devdutt Pattanaik would be analysed as a contrast, as he has written books on these two characters, and about the fluidity of genders in Indian epic literature in Shikandi. The question to follow is whether such apparent opulence of writing about the female characters from our mythology is nothing but a mere compensation for the decades of overshadowing that these characters had to face at the hands of patriarchy. The appropriation of Indian mythology to suit the gendered space of contemporary literature consumption, and the exploitation of such an appropriation by the likes of Pattanaik, however, has resulted in the female characters getting a share of their due limelight. Kate Millett’s Sexual Politics would be used to understand the nuances of such representation, and whether they constitute excessive tokenism or an attempt to please the recently sensitised academic audience, is what the paper would conclude with. The fact that most of the people (if not all) to attempt a reworking/rewriting of the Indian epics are by male authors, only contributes to the stereotypes about the readership established by the likes of Upendrakishore, which need to be broken down by feminist interventions.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.