Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Exploring complexity in construction projects

Construction projects involve and generate a number of interfaces between the various parties as these come together to deliver the output. Projects are typically characterised by complexity and previous analyses have been conducted mainly from the technical perspective. Only recently the subject of complexity has been linked to non-technical project aspects such as behavioural, social, cultural and interconnections. This paper is set out to describe the initial findings from 31 interviews with construction Project Managers which were carried out as part of an extensive investigation into socio-organisation complexity and its characteristics as this is created by the interconnection structures. In addition to the interviews, a postal survey and five case studies have been carried out all focusing in the areas of selecting project team members, structuring the project team and the management style followed by the Project Managers. Results indicate that complexity although recognised is not defined and is identified predominantly by the control and mechanistic parts of project management processes. Keywords Project Complexity, Complexity Characteristics, Project Performance, Construction

!!" # $ % & '( ) * ) + ( ) & +,- '( ) * ) + ( ) & +,- '( ) * ) + ( ) & +,- '( ) * ) + ( ) & +,- ! ! " # ! $ ! " % ! & ! ! " $ ' ' ! ( # $ $ ! " ) ' ! ! ' ! # " $ ! " # $ ' $ '# # ' ! " $ ! ' ' ' ' ' & ! & ' " " ! & ' ! ! ' ! " ! " & " ! & ' ' & & ' ! $ " * ! & ' " ! ! !!" # $ % & ! ' ' ! " * $ $ " ) $ ' $ $ " ! ! " $ -./0 1 ' +2234" , ' $ ' ! $ " 5 ,+2224 $ ! & ! ! " ! $ ") ' ! & ! " 6 ! " ) ' ! ' & " 5 ,+2224 $ " ! ! " Characteristics Autonomous agents Instability Non-equilibrium Non-linear Attractors Co-evolution Self-modification Selfreproduction Downward Causation Mutability Non-uniform Emergence Phase changes Unpredictability Non-standard Undefined values ! " $ Brief Description Complex systems comprise independent agents which are equally valuable in the operation of the system Over the long term period, complex systems experience dynamic change Energy flows will drive the system away from an equilibrium position and establish semi-stable modes as dynamic attractors Complex system outputs are not proportional to their inputs Self-organization relates to the presence in the system of dynamical attractors The parts are regarded as evolving in conjunction with each other in order to fit into a wider system environment Parts can change their associations or connectivity freely - either randomly or by evolved learning procedures Usually these systems have an ability to clone identical or edited copies The existence and properties of the parts themselves are affected by the emergent properties of the whole Random internal changes (mutations) or innovations typically occur in these systems. Each part evolves separately, giving a diversity in rule or task space The properties of the overall system will be expected to contain functions that do not exist at part level Feedback processes lead to phase changes, sudden jumps in system properties In such interacting systems a chaotic sensitivity to initial conditions can occur Initially, homogenous systems develop self-organizing structures dynamically The meaning of the system's interface with the environment is not initially specified and this must evolve + !!" # $ % & . ! ! " ! + ! $ " ) ! ! + ! & $ ! $ ! " ! +" 5 & ! $ Organisational Structure Roles within the organisations and the project teams Structure of data Corporate requirements Procedural and contract law requirements People issues Software and technology Information and Communication Project characteristics e.g. monetary size and frequency of reporting Affected by Self-modification, autonomous agents and instability Affected by Mutability and instability Affected by Downward causation and unpredictability Affected by Phase changes Affected by Unpredictability as the sensitivity of the initial conditions (Law, Institutions) affects the project set up Affected by Co-evolution, unpredictability and non-standard Affected by Non-linear, attractors and self-reproduction Affected by Attractors, phase changes and instability Affected by unpredictability, non-standard, undefined values, nonequilibrium, non-linear (and in the case of weekly reporting it acts in a reverse way instead off increasing value it reduces it.), coevolution ! 8 ! ,+2234 , 9 4 $ ! $ 0 " , -:/4' ! 7 ! , -./4' 1 ! 4 $ ,5 & ,! " # ! ' +22(0 * ' ---0 ; ' --.4" ) $ ! & ! ' ' ' --.0 ; = 1 & ' +22:4" & ! ,1 ' ,1 $ ' ) ! " 8 # ! $ ? ,@ $ ,+22 4" = ' +2234" ' " ! # --<0 1 @ A ' +2234" $ & > 8 7 ! ,+22<4" @ ! 5 ( ! ! ! , --34 # 6B ! ' $ ( ! !!" # $ % & & 7 $ $ " % & $ ' ! (! " " $ P rev ailin g C o n d itio n s 60.0 2q6a_Static -2- Dy namic 2q6b_Simple- 2-Complex 50 2q6c _Friendly -2-Hos tile 50.0 42 Percentage of respondents # ! 40.0 34 36 33 30.0 20.0 17 14 14 14 17 14 10.0 7 4 2 0.0 More S tatic 0 , Simple, Friendly Static , Simple, Friendly Half w ay Dy namic , Compex , Hos tile More Dy namic , Complex , Hos tile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