Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Divide and Conquer: Artistic Confrontations with Geographies of U.S. Militarism

2024

Panel at AAG 2024, the annual conference of the American Association of Geographers. Sponsored by the Socialist and Critical Geography Speciality Group. Participants: Aaron Katzeman (co-chair), Zoe Weldon-Yochim (co-chair), Scott Volz, Dalina A. Perdomo Álvarez Abstract: The U.S. military is everywhere and nowhere, hidden in plain sight. Although the Pentagon confirms just over 750 military bases operating in 80 countries worldwide, the actual number of U.S. military installations—including bases but also training ranges, proving grounds, supporting infrastructure, and more—is well over a thousand and, by some estimates, puts U.S. military presence in over 150 countries. Extending across the globe, into the atmosphere, and through telecommunications networks, the U.S. military's combatant commands pierce physical, outer, and digital space, locating national interests well beyond the terrestrial boundaries of earth itself. Maintaining this vast range of domination across disparate geographies not only suggests the U.S. military to be of exceptional environmental concern—it is, after all, the single largest institutional polluter on the planet, a violence that ensures the perpetuation of petrocapitalist hegemony under U.S. empire—but also a uniquely unifying subject matter for artists and activists alike, who coalesce and organize around shared inflictions. Utilizing varying media and strategies, practitioners have long scrutinized the Department of Defense’s role in administering geographies according to perceived military and economic threats, weapons testing needs, speculative extractive zones, and other forms of commodity frontiers ripe for enclosure. By way of distinct case studies, this panel traces critical artistic responses to U.S. militarism emerging in relation to settler colonial and imperialist ventures, from the origins of U.S. foreign policy in genocidal Indian Wars and the Nevada Test Site in Newe Sogobia (Western Shoshone lands), to the islands of Oʻahu in Hawaiʻi and Vieques in Puerto Rico. In doing so, papers examine how visual practices have grappled with the expansive socio-ecological costs of U.S. militarism in specific local, regional, and global geographical contexts, helping to reveal the cultural wrath of the U.S. military's physical reach.

Divide and Conquer Artistic Confrontations with Geographies of U.S. Militarism Scott Volz Town Destroyer: G. Peter Jemison’s Hanundagonyus (Two Georges) and/as Critique of Imperialism Zoe Weldon-Yochim Picturing Missiles and Mushroom Clouds: Confronting Militarized Western Shoshone Lands in Jack Malotte’s The End Aaron Katzeman Watery Creation, Oily Desecration: Kanaka Maoli Anti-Imperialism in Tiare Ribeaux’s Pōʻele Wai Dalina A. Perdomo Álvarez Post-Military Seeing: Puerto Rican Video Art and Land After Vieques 2024 AAG Annual Meeting Sponsored by Socialist and Critical Geography Speciality Group Image: Jack Malotte, The End, 1983 The U.S. military is everywhere and nowhere, hidden in plain sight. Although the Pentagon confirms just over 750 military bases operating in 80 countries worldwide, the actual number of U.S. military installations— including bases but also training ranges, proving grounds, supporting infrastructure, and more—is well over a thousand and, by some estimates, puts U.S. military presence in over 150 countries. Extending across the globe, into the atmosphere, and through telecommunications networks, the U.S. military’s combatant commands pierce physical, outer, and digital space, locating national interests well beyond the terrestrial boundaries of earth itself. Maintaining this vast range of domination across disparate geographies not only suggests the U.S. military to be of exceptional environmental concern—it is, after all, the single largest institutional polluter on the planet, a violence that ensures the perpetuation of petrocapitalist hegemony under U.S. empire—but also a uniquely unifying subject matter for artists and activists alike, who coalesce and organize around shared inflictions. Utilizing varying media and strategies, practitioners have long scrutinized the Department of Defense’s role in administering geographies according to perceived military and economic threats, weapons testing needs, speculative extractive zones, and other forms of commodity frontiers ripe for enclosure. By way of distinct case studies, this panel traces critical artistic responses to U.S. militarism emerging in relation to settler colonial and imperialist ventures, from the origins of U.S. foreign policy in genocidal Indian Wars and the Nevada Test Site in Newe Sogobia (Western Shoshone lands), to the islands of Oʻahu in Hawaiʻi and Vieques in Puerto Rico. In doing so, papers examine how visual practices have grappled with the expansive socio-ecological costs of U.S. militarism in specific local, regional, and global geographical contexts, helping to reveal the cultural wrath of the U.S. military’s physical reach.