I nnova t ive T e a c he r
BG/05/B/F/PP-166038
M e t hodology H a ndbook
on I CT -e nha nc e d sk ills
Edit e d by
Evge nia Se ndova ,
Eliza St e fa nova , N ic o va n Die pe n
Sofia , 2 0 0 7
The Methodological Handbook is prepared in frame and with support of the
Leonardo da Vinci project BG/05/B/F/PP- 166 038 Innovative Teacher /I*Teach/
(http://i-teach.fmi.uni-sofia.bg), coordinated by Ass. Prof. Dr. Iliana Nikolova,
Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” – NIS.
This handbook is intended for teachers and teacher trainers who would like to
implement practical methods, methodological tools, and software instruments to
support their students in building ICT-enhanced skills and competences. The
materials included in it were developed in collaboration with all project partners.
Special thanks are due to the teachers, and especially to Nikolina Nikolova, having
contributed with valuable ideas and feedback during the project, and to Ron
Siemelink who provided some materials.
The main contributors to the content of the Methodological Handbook are as follows:
Part 1 Innovative teacher style of teaching
Eliza Stefanova
Evgenia Sendova
Nico van Diepen
Part 2 How to build ICT enhanced skills
Information skills
Nico van Diepen
Cees Terlouw
Presentation skills
Evgenia Sendova
Eliza Stefanova
Mihaela Brut
Working-on-aProject skills
Paola Forcheri, Maria-Teresa Molfino
Gabriella Dodero
Working-in-aTeam skills
Nikodem Miranowicz,
Malgorzata Miranowicz
Part 3 I*Teach tools
Nico van Diepen
Gabriella Dodero
Part 4 Sample scenarios (on CD)
Aurelija Sviezikiene
Beata Giernatowska
Daiva Bukelytė
Desislava Ratcheva
Eliza Stefanova
Maria Korzeniowska
Miroslava Ilieva
Nelly Georgieva
Valda Kizevičiūtė
Vilma Geleziene
Appendixes (on CD)
Designer Eugenia Kovatcheva
Sofia, Bulgaria 2007 ISBN: 978-954-92146-2-8 Published by Faleza-office 2000
PART 1
I nnova t ive T e a c he r St yle of T e a c hing
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
1-1
PART 1: I nnovat ive Teacher St yle of Teaching
T a ble of c ont e nt
Introduction ............................................................................... 1-2
Why is such a handbook needed ...................................................1-2
The I*Teach project ......................................................................1-4
Which is the target audience .........................................................1-4
What is its goal ..............................................................................1-4
ICT-Enhanced skills.................................................................. 1-5
What were they and how were they identified ..............................1-5
Information skills ..............................................................................1-5
Presentation skills .............................................................................1-6
Written presentation ......................................................................1-6
Oral presentation ...........................................................................1-6
Web presentation ...........................................................................1-6
Working-on-a-Project Skills .............................................................1-7
Working-in-a-Team Skills ...............................................................1-7
Active learning ........................................................................... 1-7
Why is active learning important ......................................................1-8
Methods of active learning promoting ICT-enhanced skills ............1-8
Project-based learning ...................................................................1-8
ProblEm-based learning ..............................................................1-10
Main barriers for applying active learning .....................................1-12
I*Teach methodology .............................................................. 1-13
Conclusions .............................................................................. 1-18
What benefits and outputs could you expect ...............................1-18
References ................................................................................ 1-19
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
PART
1
1-2
Innovative Teacher
style of teaching
In this chapter:
Introduction
ICT-Enhanced skills
o Information skills
o Working-on-a-project skills
o Working-in-a-team skills
o Presentation skills
Active learning
o Main barriers for applying active learning
o Why is active learning important
o Methods of active learning promoting ICTEnhanced skills
I*Teach Methodology
I N T RODU CT I ON
Why is such a handbook needed
The aims and goals in secondary education stipulate that our pupils must
acquire a variety of skills related to ICT. Since the eighties ICT has emerged
in the classroom and in the personal lives of the pupils. That asks for general
ICT skills, the first group of required ICT-skills. Pupils must have basic
proficiency in file systems and file management, operating systems, office
applications, and the web. In some European countries these skills are
officially taught up to the level of the European Computer Driving License
(see also http://www.ecdl.com ).
The second group of the required ICT-skills is course-related and is embedded
in the subject matter. You can think of solving quadratic equations in math,
applying a mathematical ICT-program like Matlab or Mathematica. In
geography pupils can use Geographical Information Systems, or demographic
databases, or even Google Earth.
Modern education is increasingly based upon active and pupil centered
learning. As a consequence of that active, independent learning style a special
group of skills is becoming more and more important. These so called ‘soft
skills’ are the abilities of pupils connected to the proper fulfillment of their
active, independently executed learning tasks. We mention the four skills that
we regard as most important ‘soft skills’: information searching skills,
presentation skills, team working skills, and project working skills. It is an
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-3
interesting development that nowadays these ‘soft skills’ are also related with
ICT, the third group of required ICT-skills. In the following we will focus on
this third group of ICT-skills.
In the last decade the personal use of ICT by pupils has grown exponentially,
at home, at school, at the library, at the internet café. And with that growth the
need for the acquisition of the abovementioned three groups of ICT-related
skills increased accordingly. The extent of ICT use may vary in the different
European countries, the growth is enormous all over the continent. The
acquisition of ‘soft skills’ in relation with ICT is the newest development in
this respect.
In acquiring their ‘soft skills’, and in performing their tasks related to those
soft skills, pupils are using ICT. So, the acquisition of soft skills, and the soft
skills themselves, are influenced by the mere existence of ICT. The way ICT
acts upon the soft skills is too important to neglect or to be left to self
exploration by pupils. Educational professionals must now seize the
opportunity to incorporate the proper use of ICT in the (acquisition of) soft
skills. Thus the soft skills themselves will benefit from the ICT. Therefore, we
will refer to those skills as ICT-enhanced skills.
The enhancement of the soft skill by the use of ICT can be threefold. In the
first place the acquisition of the skill can be facilitated. The task is done
simpler, easier, quicker. As an example you can think of the ability to write a
report as a team. Without the proper use of a suitable ICT tool this is a tedious
task. Assembling parts, annotations, peer remarks, different versions, lay out,
all these very important aspects of collaborative writing are very difficult in a
pen-and-paper world. The second possible enhancement is the possibility of
deepening the performance of the skill. For instance, making a professional
multimedia presentation with text, sound, images, movies, animations
(collected from all over the world) is unthinkable without ICT. The
presentation skill therefore can be deepened in performance by using ICT.
And finally, the third enhancement is the chance (and challenge) to broaden
the skill. With respect to the collaboration skill ICT offers the possibility to
collaborate on an international and intercultural level which extends the
possibilities of a classroom.
Profitable and proper use of ICT in ‘soft skills’, both in acquiring the skill and
in fulfilling tasks related to the skill, doesn’t come easy. It requires a sound
methodological approach. This handbook aims at offering that approach.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-4
The I*Teach project
In response to the identified needs for skills and competences relevant to the
knowledge-based economy and the independent life-long learning the
I*Teach (Innovative Teacher) project has been launched in the autumn of
2005 with the goal of developing a set of practical methodologies, approaches
and tools targeted at day-to-day use by teacher trainers and teachers.
The project addresses the forth call priority “Continuous training of teachers
and trainers” in the Leonardo da Vinci programme Call 2005-2006.
It is expected that the results of the project will contribute to the practical
acquisition of the ICT-enhanced skills as identified above by means of the
most appropriate active learning methods. The idea behind writing this
handbook was to offer practical methods and methodological tools for design,
development, and use of:
• learning activities;
• learning assignment;
• assessment & evaluation methods.
for supporting students in building ICT- enhanced skills and competences.
Future work will be to relate the findings of the I*Teach project, and more
specific the developed scenarios, with the European Qualifications Framework
http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/educ/eqf/
(see
for
instance
index_en.html).
Which is the target audience
The book is addressed to:
• teacher trainers in ICT from universities and teacher training institutions
(pre-service and in-service)
• teachers (both pre-service and in-service) in ICT-related subjects within
vocational school settings, in specialised secondary schools (e.g.
mathematical gymnasia), vocational training centres/ organisations, or
HRD-departments in the business enterprises
Potential users are also teacher trainers and teachers in other subjects who are
willing to apply ICT in their subject domains.
What is its goal
The goal of the handbook is to provide teacher trainers and teachers with a
methodology about teaching and acquisition of the identified ICT-enhanced
skills through offering them practices in designing and developing meaningful
and motivational authentic learning scenarios (projects, challenges, activities,
assignments, and assessments).
Teachers can use these scenarios in all different settings. In mandatory classes,
where all pupils have to perform the tasks to acquire the desired skills, the
methodology is very well applicable. But for optional classes, with possibly
more interested pupils, the teacher can easily pick suitable scenarios and, if
necessary, modify and adapt them to the specific needs of the pupils. As for
other classes, like voluntary or remedial classes, the methodology offers
appropriate clues, too.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-5
The Methodological Handbook and the associated teacher training curriculum,
software instruments, and online content repository of learning tasks and
materials will hopefully promote innovative training opportunities to teachers
and trainers both as new methods of teaching and learning facilitation of ICTenhanced skills, and as training/learning delivery opportunities for their
continuous professional development.
I CT -EN H AN CED SK I LLS
What were they and how were they identified
A wide audience of teacher trainers, pre-service and in-service teachers has
been interviewed by a specially developed questionnaire, disseminated
through an educational web-site (http://www.informaticavo.nl), via e-mail and
by direct contact. The results have been analysed and summarised. The
findings have been discussed with colleagues from Netherlands, Germany,
Italy, Poland, Romania, Lithuania and Bulgaria and a conclusion has been
reached for the existence of common needs throughout Europe, with regard to
teaching and learning soft skills related to:
information;
presentation;
working on a project;
working in a team.
At the same time the acquisition of ICT skills could be interweaved in a
natural way with the four mentioned above skills thus giving the notion of
ICT-enhanced skills as it will be used throughout this handbook.
I N FORM AT I ON SK I LLS
BY
“I N FORM AT I ON
SK I LLS”
WE M EAN
The ability to collect and
process the appropriate
information properly, in
order to reach a preset
goal.
We call Information skills:
“The ability to collect and process the appropriate information properly,
in order to reach a preset goal”.
The following sub-skills have been identified as necessary for building
Information skills:
1. Ability to determine the information problem;
2. Ability to determine the relevance of the various information sources;
3. Ability to search systematically by application of relevant searching
techniques;
4. Ability to localize and acquire the found information;
5. Ability to evaluate the found information and (if necessary) to readjust
the search;
6. Ability to process the found information effectively, in order to reach
the preset goal;
7. Ability to use the found information ethically and legally.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-6
BY
PRESEN T AT I ON SK I LLS
“PRESEN T AT I ON
SK I LL”
Under Presentation skills we understand:
WE M EAN
The following sub-skills have been identified as necessary for building
Presentation skill:
1. Ability to order and select information;
2. Language proficiency;
3. Ability to build up a presentation;
4. Ability to design a presentation;
5. Ability to account for information;
6. Ability to use the proper tool properly.
Ability to present
information
“The ability to present information.”
Three sub-domains have been identified with specifics of the presentation
skills.
a. Written presentation;
b. Oral presentation;
c. Web presentation.
Here follows a specification of the presentation skills per domain:
Written presentation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ability to order and select information;
Command of the language;
Ability to build up a report;
Ability to lay-out a report;
Ability to make correct references and citations;
Ability to use a word-processor properly.
Oral presentation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ability to order and select information;
Fluency in the language;
Ability to build up an oral presentation;
Ability to design an oral presentation;
Ability to make correct references and citations;
Ability to use a presentation tool properly.
Web presentation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Ability to order and select information;
Command of the language;
Ability to build up an web presentation;
Ability to design a hyper structure;
Ability to make correct references, citations, and links;
Ability to use a web publishing tool properly;
Ability to select and use multi media.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-7
WORK I N G-ON -A-PROJ ECT SK I LLS
The following sub-skills have been identified as necessary for building skills
for working on a project:
1. Ability to identify tasks and subtasks;
2. Ability to make a planning;
3. Ability to divide tasks;
4. Ability to communicate internally;
5. Ability to communicate externally;
6. Ability to keep track of the progress;
7. Ability to integrate results;
8. Ability to use the proper tools properly.
WORK I N G-I N -A-T EAM SK I LLS
The following sub-skills have been identified as necessary for building skills
for working in a team:
1. Ability to communicate internally;
2. Ability to communicate externally;
3. Ability to give feedback;
4. Ability to receive feedback;
5. Ability to resolve conflicts
6. Ability to support the team loyally, as a good colleague;
7. Ability to take responsibility.
The communication in 1 & 2: includes written and oral communication, faceto-face and virtual communication, intercultural communication, reports and
short notes.
ACT I V E LEARN I N G
A selection of pedagogical theories, methodologies and practices for teaching
Enhanced ICT-skills has been discussed both electronically and face-to-face
by the I*Teach project partners. On that base the active learning methods
have been identified as the most appropriate instructional approaches related
to the effective teaching of the selected ICT-enhanced skills.
The definitions on the web include the following key-words related to
active learning:
Carefully constructed activities which range from groups of students
discussing material during a calculated pause in a lecture, to roleplaying, case studies, group projects, and seminars.
It is about learning by doing, performing, and taking action. The
action can be either mental (e.g. reflection) or physical (e.g. case
study). It uses such devices as games, simulations, introspection,
role playing.
In active learning, students are much more actively engaged in their
own learning while educators take a more guiding role. Related
terms/concepts include: experiential learning, hands on learning.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-8
Systematic process of reflection on action, for the purpose of
developing skills and competencies
Active learning involves reading, writing, discussion, and
engagement in solving problems, analysis, synthesis, and
evaluation. Active learning is also known as cooperative learning
Why is a c t ive le a rning im port a nt
“I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand."
Confucius
I M PORT AN T
In order to be actively
involved students
should not only listen
but also read, write,
discuss, or be engaged
in solving problems.
Some cognitive research has shown that a significant number of individuals
have learning styles best served by pedagogical techniques other than
lecturing. As Chickering and Gamson (1987) suggests, in order to be actively
involved students should not only listen but also read, write, discuss, or be
engaged in solving problems. Most important, they should be engaged in
such higher-order thinking tasks as analysis, synthesis, and evaluation.
Using active learning techniques in the classroom is found vital because of
their powerful impact upon students' learning. Several studies have shown that
strategies promoting active learning are superior to lectures in promoting
the development of students' skills in thinking and writing.
Developing skills, identified by the I*Teach project as Enhancing the ICT
skills, is in harmony with objectives of active learning.
M e t hods of a c t ive le a rning prom ot ing I CT -e nha nc e d
sk ills
PROJECT-BASED LEARNING
Project-based Learning (PBL) is a model of carefully designed learning
activities that are long-term, interdisciplinary, student-centred, and integrated
with real-world issues and practices.
The goal of a project (defined as an in-depth investigation of a topic worth
learning) is to learn more about a topic rather than to seek the right answers to
questions posed by the teacher. In PBL classrooms, students work
cooperatively with their classmates over a sustained period of time to solve
problems and ultimately present their work to an outside audience. This final
project might be a multimedia presentation, a play, a written report, a web
page or a constructed product.
Some powerful components of PBL include:
Relevance PBL provides learning experiences that involve students in
complex, real world projects with which they develop and apply skills
and knowledge. Course content is more meaningful because it is based
on real world learning and students can look at their work in a way that
is interesting to them.
Challenge PBL encourages students to solve complex, authentic
problems. They explore, make judgments, interpret, and synthesize
information in meaningful ways. Examples of such projects are:
creating plans for an “ideal school,” complete with curriculum, job
descriptions, floor plans, criteria for hiring and rationales for each.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-9
Motivation PBL recognizes that significant learning enhances students'
innate desire to learn, their capability to do important work, and their
need to be valued. When students have the opportunity to be in control
of their learning, its value to them is increased. The opportunity for
choice and control, as well as the chance to collaborate with their peers,
also increases their motivation.
Interdisciplinarity PBL requires students to use information from
several disciplines to solve problems. In almost every PBL enterprise,
students work on assignments that link disciplines.
Authenticity PBL engages students in learning information in ways
that are more like the ways adults are asked to learn and demonstrate
knowledge. For example, real-world, authentic implications are clear
when students complete an English assignment such as creating
brochures that publicize their school.
Collaborativeness PBL promotes collaboration between students and
between students and teachers; in many cases collaboration extends to
the community. All disciplines recognize the importance of students
working collaboratively as a means of enriching and expanding
students’ understanding of what they are learning.
Fun Students enjoy Project-based Learning! Teachers who use PBL
talk about students who are eager to come to school.
I M PORT AN T
The importance of a
project is the experience
of doing it.
Savoie and Hughes describe the PBL process in the following steps:
1. Identify a problem suitable for students.
2. Connect the problem with the students’ world.
3. Organize the subject around the problem/project, not the discipline.
4. Give students the opportunity to define their learning experience and
planning to solve the problem.
5. Encourage collaboration by creating learning teams.
6. Expect all students to present the results of their learning with a
project or performance.
PBL is not an add-on, but an integral component of learning. As teachers
increasingly instruct groups of children with different learning styles,
diverse backgrounds, and varying ability levels, PBL offers a direct
approach to learning that can help all students achieve. With roots in
constructivism, PBL is grounded in the work of psychologists and
educators such as Lev Vygotsky, Jerome Bruner, Jean Piaget and John
Dewey. Constructivist learning is based on students’ active participation
in problem-solving and critical thinking regarding a learning activity that
they find relevant and engaging. The groundwork is set for students to be
in control of their own learning and to construct their own meaning from a
wealth of sources. The pupil learns by thinking about problems and trying
to solve them. The importance of a project is the experience of doing it,
not the end result. As they say: Teacher is guide on the side rather than
sage on the stage. The teacher and students provide formative evaluation
and possibly with the help of others - the summative (final) evaluation.
You can find information on evaluating projects in the appendix and at the
following site:
http://tutor.petech.ac.za/EducSupport/examples1.htm
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-10
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING
The Problem Based Learning is an individual or group activity that goes on
over a period of time, resulting in a product, presentation, or performance. It
typically has a timeline, milestones, and other aspects of formative evaluation
as the project proceeds. The essence of problem-based learning is that it is a
group approach encouraging a self-directed and independent learning. The
approach is based on providing a problem or issue usually encountered in
everyday organizational life. Students have a significant voice in selecting the
content areas and nature of the projects that they do. They are expected to
explore the nature of the problem, analyze the issues, and use relevant
theoretical frameworks to research possible solutions, dilemmas and
conflictions. There is considerable focus on students understanding what it is
they are doing, why it is important, and how they will be assessed. Indeed,
students may help to set some of the goals over which they will be assessed
and how they will be assessed over these goals. All of these learner-centered
characteristics the Problem Based Learning contribute to learner motivation
and active engagement. A high level of motivation and active engagement are
essential to the success of this approach. You might ask: What evidence do we
have that increasing the emphasis on a lesson being student centered leads to
better quality education?
From the student point of view the Problem Based Learning:
• Is learner centered and intrinsically motivating.
• Encourages collaboration and cooperative learning.
• Requires students to produce a product, presentation, or performance.
• Allows students to make incremental and continual improvement in their
product, presentation, or performance.
• Is designed so that students are actively engaged in "doing" things rather
then in "learning about" something.
• Is challenging, focusing on higher-order knowledge and skills.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-11
From the teacher point of view the Problem Based Learning:
• Has authentic content and purpose.
• Uses authentic assessment.
• Is teacher facilitated—but the teacher is much more a "guide on the side"
rather than a "sage on the stage."
• Has explicit educational goals.
• Is rooted in constructivism (a social learning theory) and gives careful
consideration to situated learning theory.
• Is designed so that the teacher will be a learner, learning from and with the
students.
5 ALM OST
I DEN T I CAL
CH ARACT ERI ST I CS
The problem comes first before any other
information.
The problem is presented
realistically.
Subject matter is
organized around
problems rather than
disciplines.
Students drive their own
learning.
Students work in small
group.
Schultz and Christensen (2004) state that this method involves seven major
steps
1. Understanding the situation/clarifying the terminology/clarifying
the concepts
The teacher and the group read the scenario/problem; the teacher then asks
if any of the group do not understand any of the vocabulary in the
scenario/problem.
2. Identifying/formulating the problem
The teacher asks the group to identify what they think the
scenario/problem statement is about. At this stage, students may be
clueless about the depth of the knowledge inherent in the statement but
this will become clearer as the process continues. Some of the answers
therefore may be naïve or ignorant but this does not matter. The educator
must resist the temptation at this point of stepping in and offering any
form of knowledge transmission!
3. Analyzing and brainsorming, suggesting possible causes
(hypothesizing)
A brainstorm session is held to ascertain what is known (or is believed to
be known) about the subject matter by any of the students at this point in
time.
4. Systematic analysis of the problem, connecting problems with
causes
Discuss the key issues that have been discussed. The teacher ensures that a
clear list of what is known, what is unclear and what needs to be
investigated in more detail is established. This is designed to help the
group understand the issues surrounding the scenario/problem.
5. Deciding what type of information, ICT-enhanced skills, learning
goals, and competencies are needed
The group agree on their learning objectives and the tasks that they will
have to carry out before the next meeting.
6. Studying/task performing/obtaining information
Individual Study - members of the group collect the information identified
in step 5. There is a choice of two routes here - either each student should
tackle his or her own learning objectives, or each student covers all the
learning objectives. The latter is more time consuming and may be offputting for students and avoid inculcating the collaborative team based
learning experience. However, the former option may result in gaps in an
individual's knowledge and understanding. The teacher can provide a list
of references to help guide students in their line of investigation.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-12
Evaluation/result/Apply the information
The group meet for the second time. The Teacher asks to read out the
learning objectives and each student has the opportunity to present their
research to the rest of the group. It is suggested that this can be done either
formally, i.e. in turn, or through questions.
This method is very similar to the Project-based Learning and was
developed in the early 1970s in medical schools. Howard Barrows (1986),
professor at the medical school of McMaster University in Canada,
recognized that Dewey’s theory could apply to his medical students who
were frustrated with traditional lectures. Barrows developed a set of
problems that went beyond traditional case studies: he required the
students to research specific situations, develop appropriate questions, and
come up with their own answers.
7.
M a in ba rrie rs for a pplying a c t ive le a rning
I M PORT AN T
Each obstacle or barrier
and type of risk,
is worth overcoming.
Educationalists are aware of the common barriers to instructional change,
including the powerful influence of educational tradition; faculty’s selfperceptions and self-definition of roles; the discomfort and anxiety that
change creates; and the limited incentives for faculty to change.
But certain specific obstacles are associated with the use of active learning
including limited class time; a possible increase in preparation time; the
potential difficulty of using active learning in large classes; and a lack of
needed materials, equipment, or resources.
Perhaps the single greatest barrier of all, however, is the fact that the efforts of
the teachers to employ active learning involve the risks that:
• students will not participate.
•
•
students will not use higher-order thinking.
students will not learn sufficient content.
•
the teachers will feel a loss of control, lack necessary skills, or be
criticized for teaching in unorthodox ways.
Each obstacle or barrier and type of risk, however is worth overcoming.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-13
I * T EACH M ET H ODOLOGY
T H E I DEA
I * T EACH
M ET H ODOLOGY
Continuous, gradually
accumulated experiences.
Students meet concrete
objectives by performing
specific tasks in different
contexts.
Methodological framework –
Educational scenarios
The I*Teach methodology proposes is based on Project and Problem based
learning methods.
The methodology idea is: to build ICT-enhanced skills is done through
continuous, repeatable and gradually accumulated experiences and
expanded activities leading to concrete goals by performing specific tasks in
different context. The goals expected to work on some core skills and to be a
challenge for the students and coming from a real live - not just a problem
for somebody in the world. As in real life necessary skills to go to the final
goal are complementary. That is why the idea of methodology is that ICTenhanced will be build interwoven during the path to the goal.
The I*Teach methodology tries to find the balance between the full freedom
(involving the risk of being lost in the jungle) and the full direction (following
your master by leash and not being let to explore the environment).
Educational scenarios are foreseen as a methodological framework.
SCEN ARI O
SCEN ARI O
A composition of tasks
• In the context of an
active learning
environment
• Leading the students to
a general goal
(producing a specific
product)
• Via a path
(working/learning
process)
traced by milestones
(intermediate
objectives/stages of the
product development)
The scenario is a composition of tasks in the context of an active learning
environment leading the students to a general goal (producing a specific
product) via a path (working/learning process) traced by milestones
(intermediate objectives/ stages of the product development) (fig. 1).
The density of the milestones depends on the students’ age and
experience – the younger and less experienced the students, the bigger
the number of landmarks :
•
When I*Teach methodology is applied with smaller or less
experienced pupils milestones could be established
frequently.
• When I*Teach methodology is applied in class with bigger or
more experienced pupils milestones could be established
rarely.
The milestones are positioned by the teachers in such a way that the
students could build a set of ICT-enhanced skills naturally interwoven
with the predetermined teaching objectives. At each milestone pupils are
expected to have finished a concrete stage of the product development and
mastered a concrete skill. By passing along the set of milestones the
students/pupils would hopefully build up a set of ICT-Enhanced Skills
naturally interweaved with predetermined teaching objectives.
Certain fragments (phases and tasks) might split into branches – this corresponding to
the flexibility of the students when choosing a way to achieve an intermediate
milestone.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-14
Figure 1 The I*Teach roadmap metaphor (source of picture:
http://www.skivitosha.com)
T ASK
T ASK
•
•
•
Building elements of a
scenario
Working on concrete
skill(s)/sub-skill(s)
Ensuring reusability in
different contexts
The task is a building element of a scenario. Performing concrete task
student/pupil will work on concrete skill(s) or sub-skill(s). Describing the
scenario as composition of tasks ensuring reusability in different contexts.
Task is a sequence of activities with concrete outcomes.
Depending on age and experience of student/pupils:
• in case of work with smaller or less experienced pupils list of tasks
could be spited in more activities (more detailed description of path
which pupil should go).
•
in case methodology is applied in class with bigger or more
experienced pupils tasks could be in more activities (more detailed
description of path which pupil should go).
H OW T O APPLY I * T EACH M ET H ODOLOGY
To apply I*Teach methodology, first you need to apply active learning
methods. In our view (see fig. 2):
• Learning situations should recall problems and methodologies adopted in
professional contexts. Authentic tasks should be presented, combining
two different approaches (see fig. 3 ):
o tasks of interest for the students;
o task allowing to connect with the extra-scholastic world.
• Activities should be flexible enough to allow their adaptation (to some
extent) to different time needs, learning difficulties, abilities involved, ....
This is needed for the development of project working abilities at different
levels of complexity (see fig. 4)
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
•
•
•
•
1-15
Activities should suggest interdisciplinary connections and collaboration,
to be representative of actual project working, where usually it is required
to integrate different capabilities and competences (see Figure 5).
Suitable scaffolding should be provided, and should be adapted to the
students’ level of performance. Scaffolding is a metaphor introduced by
constructivist researchers, and refers to the student-teacher interactions
that produce learning [Wood, Bruner, & Ross 1976]. Scaffolding is related
to Vygotsky’s studies about the zone of proximal development, that is the
zone between what someone can do by himself, and what someone can do
with the expert’s help [Vygotsky 1978]. In practice, scaffolding refers to
all kinds of stimuli, suggestions, supports intentionally aimed to help
students to tackle a task [Jonassen, Mayes & McAleese 1993]. Scaffolding
is crucial in supporting students to become an active part in constructing
learning [Rasku-Puttonen, Eteläpelto, Arvaja & Häkkinen 2003]: all
activities, and tools provided to carry out them, should be organised taking
into account this fact. Examples of scaffolding tools aimed to facilitate the
learning of project working abilities are given in Table 4, Part 2; different
types of scaffolding are considered, together with examples of possible
developments and tools.
Activities should be clearly presented to students, in order to increase
motivation, connect the work to previous knowledge, prevent
disorientation. The teacher must describe objectives, prerequisites,
abilities and content expected to be learnt as a result of the work, and heshe must give any information about time needed, tools provided, overall
organisation, task to be completed, and evaluation.
Activities should integrate the learning of specific competences
(content, methods and tools) with that of working in a project, that is to
handle and articulate a problem, to actively participate, with different
roles, into planning, monitoring, evaluating and adjusting its execution,
taking into account views and contributions of all involved into the
project. This includes (group) evaluation, self-evaluation, reporting
activities, collections of good practice, discussions, organisation in
subtasks of a complex work, etc.
Present at ion
I nt roduced by
Aut hent ic t ask
I nt erdisciplinary
Based on
Suggest s
Encourages
Collaborat ion
Act ivit y
Support ed by
D e ve lops
Fost ers
Teacher’s and t ools
Specific t opic
learning
I CT- e n h a n ce d
sk ills
Figure 2. The main characteristics of an I*Teach activity
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-16
Example
Aim: To increase motivation, by proposing, within the learning of a well defined
topic, tasks of real interest
Problems
- Creation and maintenance of the school journal, or of a forum on a topic of
interest
- Creation and maintenance of the school web site
- Evaluation of usability of a web site
- Peer review activity
Figure 3. Examples of learning situations
Example
Aim: To help students acquire capabilities of integrating results
Problem Prepare an electronic presentation on application software, with particular
reference to electronic presentations and spreadsheets. Use as operative examples
ppt and excel respectively. Your presentation is oriented towards beginners, nontechnical people.
Method 1 (Initial level). Students are given two or three presentations referring to
the topics of interest and are required to build their presentation starting from them
Method 2 (advanced level). Students are required to look for material on the web
(given a list of websites), select valuable material, and build their presentation
starting from them. A discussion of the selection criteria completes the work.
Figure 4. Examples of different approaches to the development of a project working
ability
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-17
Example 1
Aim: To help students acquire cognitive and metacognitive capabilities of
envisioning a problem in its whole, recognising the different aspects, understanding
their mutual dependences, planning a solution; social capabilities of learning from
each other, integrating different view, …
Activity
Prepare a presentation about ‘The house in ancient Rome’, analysing the problem
from both the historical and the architectural points of view
Example 2
Aim. To help students identify similarity and differences of situations, work out
common methodologies, plan a negotiated solution
Activity
Individual work
- Prepare an annotated sitography about ‘web resources for learning English’
- Prepare an annotated sitography about ‘Web resources for learning French
Work in pair: Read and comment the sitography prepared by your mate. Devise a
common procedure for preparing an annotated sitography about ‘Web resources for
learning a foreign language’
Classroom discussion Can the proposal be extended to learning other languages? Is
the proposal apt to students of different languages and cultural backgrounds? ..
Figure 5. Examples of project working oriented activities that require collaboration
and involve various disciplines
I * T EACH T OOLS
You could apply I*Teach methodology just following it core idea. You could
use your own description of your practices or even without description. In the
beginning this seams to be the most natural application.
When you test in practices one and like it, may be you will like to share your
experience with your colleagues, or even for your use later or in different
situation with some modifications as well as to generate later new scenarios
from already available tasks we propose you to use some of the I*Teach tools.
One type of tools are scenarios and tasks description templates. The
scenario description template is presented in Appendix 1. The task
description template is presented in Appendix 2. Working with template you
will look carefully which ICT Enhanced skills you could build together with
your main goal. Using them you could suggest to your pupils different tasks
and scenarios so they to work on different ICT Enhanced skills you would like
they to build. In such a way together with them you could prepare for each
you pupil the ICT Enhanced skills portfolio.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-18
Second type of tools you could use to generate easily tasks and scenario in
I*Teach template are XML Tools, helping you during your work with task
and scenario template in Office application and preparing them in form
shareable to the other Innovative Teacher.
When you would like to share your experience with your colleagues applying
I*Teach methodology, then you could go to the I*Teach repository, which is
a third type of tools we would like to propose you.
The I*Teach repository could be use from the experience users to put their
scenarios and tasks as well as from the beginners to find there suitable, tested
and already approved in practice examples how to start Appling I*Teach
methodology.
CON CLU SI ON S
What benefits and outputs could you expect
By mastering the ICT-Enhanced skills, which integrate the competences of
using ICT and of possessing important soft skills, the students and trainees
will be equipped with means to work successfully in the context of knowledge
economy and life long learning. Since these skills are considered important
from an employability perspective and are interdisciplinary in their nature, the
people who possess them will have higher chances for employability and will
be able to adapt to the increasing job performance requirements and problem
solving contexts.
Through the products and training/learning mechanisms, developed set of
skills and competences, important for the labour market and for life long
learning are promoted. The methodology and the sample curriculum
developed within the project will allow a very flexible and adaptive approach
with respect to when and how to integrate the teaching of these skills within
different forms of training (initial or continuous) and curriculum settings. The
very essence of the concept of enhanced ICT skills is closely linked to the
process of consolidation of technological and organisational change by
equipping the people with the skills needed to successfully carry out both
changes and thus, be capable to work towards their integration.
The addressed ICT enhanced skills equip the trainees with integrated abilities
to effectively apply technology skills and soft skills in resolving real work
problems within professional and business settings. This set of ICT enhanced
skills reinforces and stimulates the abilities of the people who possess them to
think and work innovatively and adaptively to the fast changes in their work
environment. Both the acquisition of the ICT enhanced skills themselves and
the way of their teaching to the learners by using the developed methodology
and the associated products and tools, increase the personal competitiveness,
entrepreneurship, and inventiveness of the trained people, thus contributing to
the leverage of the business entities competitiveness and entrepreneurship.
Innovative Teacher
I*Teach Methodology Handbook
PART 1: Innovative Teacher Style of Teaching
1-19
REFEREN CES
Barrows, H.S. (1986), A Taxonomy of problem-based learning
methods. Medical education, 20(6), pp. 481-486.
Chickering, A.W. & Gamson, Z.F. (1987), Seven principles for good
practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), pp. 37.
Jonassen, D., Mayes, T., & McAleese, R. (1993), A manifesto for a
constructivist approach to uses of technology in higher education.
InT.M. Duffy, J. Lowyck, and D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Designing
environments for constructive learning (pp. 232-247), Heidelberg,
Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
Rasku-Puttonen, H., Eteläpelto, A., Arvaja, M., & Häkkinen, P. (2003),
Is successful scaffolding an illusion? Shifting patterns of
responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction during a
long-term project. Instructional Science, 31, pp. 377-393.
Savoie, J.M. & Hughes, A.S. (1994), Problem-based Learning as
Classroom Solutions. Educational leadership 52(3), pp. 54-57.
Schultz, N. & Christensen, H.P, (2004), Seven-step problem-based
learning in an interaction design course. European Journal of
Engineering Education, 29(4), pp. 533-541.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
Wood, D, Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976), The role of tutoring in problem
solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, 17, pp. 89-100.
Innovative Teacher