BROTHER SUN: UNUSUAL FRANCISCAN ICONOGRAPHY ON A DERUTESE "PIATTO DI POMPA"
Author(s): Norman Hammond
Source: Source: Notes in the History of Art, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Fall 2006), pp. 27-33
Published by: Ars Brevis Foundation, Inc.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23207960 .
Accessed: 25/02/2014 12:27
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
.
Ars Brevis Foundation, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Source:
Notes in the History of Art.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:27:42 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
BROTHER
SUN:
UNUSUAL
ON A DERUTESE
FRANCISCAN
PIATTO
ICONOGRAPHY
Dl POMPA
Norman Hammond
The small town of Deruta, some 15 kilome
ters south of Perugia on the upper Tiber and
a similar distance downstream from Assisi
on the Chiascio, has long been noted for its
production of the tin-glazed polychrome
pottery known as maiolica.1 Both bricks and
pottery vessels were made in Deruta from
the thirteenth century onward. After the
plague of 1456, depopulation was countered
with a forty-year tax exemption that saw an
influx of master potters from other towns.
The
istoriato design frequently overflowed to
the rim, removing the border altogether.
The central medallions of piatti di pompa
might contain a profile portrait, a coat of
arms, or a narrative vignette. Designs were
often copied from other media. For exam
ple, Perugino's Erythraean Sibyl in the Col
legio del Cambio in Perugia inspired several
plates, the same artist providing an angel, a
Nativity, and a Virgin and Child; others
derived from the works of Marcantonio Rai
Masci family established
themselves
there by 1489, split into three branches in
1498, and, in requesting new citizenship,
referred to laboreria maiolicata, lusterware,
which seems to have been the source of
their fame and fortune. They disappeared
mondi.5 Such religious subjects on piatti are
not complex, but are, rather, reduced to a
single striking image. Thus, the Madonna is
extracted from the San Francesco
Alfani
fresco, and the figure of Gabriel is taken
by 1490,3 the Mancini, including Giacomo
(nicknamed El Frate) and his sons Filippo
and Africano, prominent among the notable
producers from the second quarter of the
sixteenth century into the early seven
teenth.4 An emphasis on jars and dishes that
saints are common
and
Non-apostolic
include Anthony Abbot, Barbara, Catherine
of Alexandria,
Cecilia,
George, Jerome,
Michael, Roch, and Sebastian, each with an
identifying attribute.7
It is not surprising that, given Deruta's
from the records, however, after 1528.2 The
production of istoriato wares, with figural
and often narrative subjects, probably began
could
from the Perugino/Pinturicchio
Annuncia
tion.6 The life of Christ includes portrayals
of the Crucifixion, the Resurrection, and,
more rarely, the Incredulity of Thomas.
accommodate
elaborate abstract or
ornament
figured
appeared by the end of the
proximity to Assisi, the life of Saint Francis
was a common subject (the market for such
within concentric bands of often foliate
motifs. By the mid-sixteenth century, the
able).8 The small, hastily painted coppa or
jug, showing Saint Francis at prayer in front
of a large cross, must have been at the lower
end of the price and prestige range,9 the piat
to di pompa at the top. Carola Fiocco and
fifteenth century, providing a broader sur
face for decoration. Display plates (piatti di
pompa) were developed that used a formal
template of a central istoriato medallion
devotional
wares must have been consider
This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:27:42 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
28
Fig. 1 Saint Francis on a piatto di pompa from Deruta. 1500-1540. Maiolica,
165/8in. (42.2 cm) diameter. Toledo Museum of Art, Ohio (1949.39). (Photo: cour
tesy
of the Toledo
Museum
of Art)
This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:27:42 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
29
Fig.
2
Saint
1500-1540.
Francis
of Art, William
Angeles
Receiving
Maiolica,
Randolph
County
Museum
the Stigmata,
on
a piatto
di pompa
from
Deruta.
16'/4 in. (41.3 cm) diameter. Los Angeles County Museum
Hearst
Collection
(50.9.12).
(Photo:
courtesy
of Art)
This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:27:42 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
of the Los
30
Gherardi note that such piatti
Gabriella
"required elevated subjects: moral, religious,
historical and allegorical," that "the predom
inant presence of St. Francis ... attests to the
popularity of a cult widespread everywhere,"
and that "St. Francis, in the act of receiving
the stigmata, is perhaps the most widespread
depiction."10
In 1949, the Toledo Museum of Art pur
chased a Deruta maiolica piatto di pompa of
at a Parke-Bernet sale in
about 1510-1540
New York City (Joseph Brummer Collection,
lot 479; museum accession no. 1949.39). Its
dimensions, 42.2 centimeters (16-78 inches)
diameter
and 9.2 centimeters (35h inches)
high, place it squarely in the range of similar
plates of this period. The rim is decorated
with four sets of intertwined foliate motifs,
the central medallion with a scene identified
in the museum's records as Saint Francis
Receiving the Stigmata (Fig. 1).
The scene is, however, not like other
Stigmatization portrayals on Deruta plates,
of which the excellent example from the
William Randolph Hearst Collection now in
of Art
the Los Angeles County Museum
accession
no. 50.9.12)
(museum
may be
This
as
specimen,
typical (Fig. 2).
regarded
slightly smaller than the Toledo plate, with a
diameter of 41.3 centimeters (16'/4 inches),
is, according to the museum, possibly from
of Giacomo
El
the workshop
Mancini,
Frate.11
plate shows Saint Fran
cis positioned just left of center in front of a
church or chapel with a pointed tower, tiled
roof, and round-arched doorway. A second
The Los Angeles
and lower part of the building with a cupola
is visible in the background to the left, and a
tree with a bushy top and two sets of leaves
partway up the trunk are to the right of the
tower. The saint kneels on a level but rocky
hummocks
place, a series of vegetated
behind him and an area of rocks and vegeta
tion jutting into the scene from the right
margin.
Francis kneels on his right knee and faces
up and to his left toward a seraphic crucifix
in the sky at top center. Five lines from the
crucified
Christ's feet, hands, and chest
strike Saint Francis in the corresponding
parts of his body: on the inside of the left
foot, the outside of the right foot, the base of
the left little finger, the base of the right
thumb, and the center of his habit. No
wounds are seen: the event is in progress.
This is the standard iconography for the
fres
of Saint Francis—in
Stigmatization
coes such as those by Giotto in the Upper
Francesco
at Assisi
(c.
and
the
Bardi
1297-1300)
Chapel at Santa
Croce in Florence (c. 1325), and in numer
ous easel paintings (for example, the one by
Church
of San
Giotto of about 1300 in the Louvre, which
closely resembles the Assisi fresco, and the
one by Taddeo Gaddi of around 1325-1330
in the Fogg Art Museum [1929.234]
at Har
vard). The proximate model for the piatti
seems to be the Assisi image (unsurprising,
given their souvenir function), although
there the head of the saint is more in profile,
his hands are held palm forward rather than
turned out to display the stigmata more
clearly, and the seraphic Christ lacks a
cross; in addition. Brother Leo is present at
lower right, reading a book. The cross is
present in the Bardi Chapel fresco; but the
of Christ, his relationship to the ser
aph's wings, and the posture of Saint Fran
cis are different. A free adaptation
of
pose
Giotto's basic image is the best definition of
what local potters were producing as sou
venirs and display pieces. Timothy Wilson
that this adaptation
at Deruta
suggests
This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:27:42 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
31
derives
from a north Italian engraving of
about 1500.12
The rocky landscape in all the images is
that of Mount Averna, where the stigmatiza
tion took place on September 14, 1224; the
Francis's
building is presumably
oratory
there (although Fiocco and Gherardi identi
near Assisi, which,
fy it as the Porziuncola
while not impossible, would involve a con
scious conflation of two different times and
places in the same scene).13 In other, more
unusual
painted renditions Francis stands
rather than kneels (as in the Frick's Saint
Francis in Ecstasy)4, sometimes the oratory is
a natural cave instead of a man-made
struc
all media
ture; and some versions—in
—include the figure of Brother Leo. But the
reverential pose of the saint, the seraphic
crucifix, and the presence of lines joining
the two figures, with or without emergent
stigmata, define the event.
The Toledo plate is different. Saint Fran
cis kneels on his right knee, as on the Los
Angeles plate, and the details of his position
in the medallion, his posture, and the drap
ery of his habit are so similar as to suggest
use of the same design with only minor
changes.14 Francis shows clear stigmata, as
reddish spots on the palms of his hands and
the sides of his feet, the same loci as on the
Los Angeles plate. The oratory and trees
behind him are similar in design but differ
in detail. However, in the background is a
fortified town instead of a hummocky land
Lauaes
it
creaturarum,
San Damiano
Laudato
tue
was
composed
at
in the summer of 1225:
sie, mi' Signore,
cum fructe le
creature,
messor lo frate sole,
Spezialmente
Lo quale e iorno, et allumini noi per lui.
Et ellu e bellu e radiante cum grande
splendore;
De te, Altissimo,
porta significazione
Be praised, my Lord, through all that
you created,
Especially the lord Brother Sun,
Who is the day, and you bring us light
through him.
and
he is beautiful and radiant with
much splendor;
Of you, O most high, it bears witness
Depictions of Saint Francis intoning the
Cantico alfrate sole are considerably rarer
than those of the Stigmatization.
This is
partly because the event may be more diffi
cult to portray and partly because it may be
less intrinsically dramatic. There is continu
ing debate over even such notable Francis
can images as the Frick's Saint Francis in
Ecstasy: some scholars (for example, Ken
neth Clark, Richard Turner, and Hellmut
Wohl)16 identify it as portraying the Canti
co; Millard Meiss and I argue for a Stigma
tization; Alastair Smart sees Francis rising
after his nocturnal ordeal of stigmatization
"to greet the risen sun, whose praises he was
scape. In the sky above is a large Sun with
wavy rays and a human face. The event por
trayed is clearly not the Stigmatization—
to sing as the most beautiful of all created
things."17 Giles Robertson ingeniously con
ished, to be replaced by the personified Sun.
What is being shown is the next event in
ta and "an illustration
that
has
its
occurred,
already
leaving
marks—and
the seraphic crucifix has van
the life of Saint Francis: the composition of
the Cantico
al frate sole.15 Part of the
flates the two events, interpreting the light
from beyond the frame as simultaneously
the radiance of Christ conferring the stigma
of the Hymn to the
Sun ...
the function of the seraph has actu
been
taken over by the sun itself."18
ally
There is ambiguity because the sun itself is
This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:27:42 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
32
not shown, and explicit portrayals of the
Cantico alfrate sole are uncommon enough
to leave that ambiguity unresolved.
The Toledo piatto thus shows us a rare
of several
common
image
composed
themes. The figure of Saint Francis derives
from the standard Stigmatization
imagery,
and the oratory behind him from Mount
Alverna, where this occurred, now indicates
San Damiano.
The personified Sun, on the
other hand, comes
religious
from secular rather than
(like
iconography
many
of the
designs on piatti di pompa), while the forti
fied town is Assisi,
outside which San
Damiano
lies. The rarity of this particular
Franciscan
maiolica
image on Derutese
may attest to a comparative lack of interest
in it among pilgrims and social aspirants,
who preferred the immediacy of the Stigma
tization or the mundanity of Saint Francis at
other examples
come to
prayer. Unless
light, its presence here may be the result of
a special commission from a more educated
or more humanist client.
NOTES
1. C. Fiocco
Busti
and G. Gherardi,
dal XIII
Deruta:
al XVIII
and F. Cocchi,
Deruta
La ceramica
di
223-224.
1994);
(Perugia:
ceramisti e ceramiche
G.
servers
di
Fitzwilliam
eds.,
secolo
Maestri
T. Wilson,
"II ruolo di
1997);
Deruta nello sviluppo
della maiolica
istoriata," in La
ceramica
umbra al tempo di Perugino,
ed. G. Busti
and F. Cocchi
am grateful
(Milan:
2004), pp. 39^49.1
(Florence:
to Timothy Wilson of Oxford University for introduc
and for much good
ing me to the Toledo
piatto
to Dr. Jutta Page of the Toledo
Museum
of
advice;
of Boston University
Art; and to Astrid Runggaldier
for help with Italian texts.
2. Fiocco
and Gherardi, pp. 107-108.
3. Wilson, pp. 39^12.
4. Busti and Cocchi,
Maestri ceramisti, pp. 54—81.
of the Mancini.
Pages 80-81 give a useful genealogy
5. Busti
6. C.
and Cocchi,
Fiocco
dal Medioevo
and
alio
La ceramica.
G. Gherardi,
storicismo
Ceramiche
(Faenza:
p. 95.
umbre
1988-1989),
7. Ibid., pp. 95-96;
G. Busti and F. Cocchi,
Museo
della ceramica
di Deruta:
Ceramiche
regionale
poli
crome, a lustro e terrecotte di Deruta dei secoli XV e
XVI (Milan: 1999), pp. 238-239.
8. Fiocco
and Gherardi,
La
ceramica,
p. 109; id.,
Italian Maiolica
Ceramiche
umbre, p. 96; T. Wilson,
Wilson
(Milan:
1996), pp. 70-72.
of the Renaissance
of both lustered and unlus
gives a useful checklist
tered representations
of the Stigmatization.
9. Fiocco
and Gherardi,
Ceramiche
umbre,
235;
Busti
and
Cocchi,
Museo
regionale,
Good
as
of jugs—practical
examples
as souvenirs—can
be seen
well
Museum,
Cambridge
(C.66-67.1927).
wine
in the
University
10. Fiocco
and Gherardi, La ceramica,
p. 109. The
they illustrate, on p. 216, from the Castello
in Milan (inv. no. 16), does not show the
but simply Saint Francis,
with no
Stigmatization,
stigmata, kneeling in prayer.
example
Sforzesco
11. The
Museum
of Art's
Angeles
County
this to 1530-1545,
but I am persuaded
otherwise
of T. Wilson
by the arguments
(personal
June 2005),
in reference
communication,
especially
records
Los
date
to the rim decoration
and its similarity to historically
dated pieces. Wilson says: "I see no reason to rule out
a date for both LACMA
and Toledo pieces as early as
I would myself probably
label them ca.
1500/1510;
1500^-0."
Wilson also doubts the Los Angeles
Coun
of Art's suggestion
that its plate may be
ty Museum
from the El Frate workshop.
I prefer the early and
narrower date range attributed to the Toledo plate also
for the Los Angeles
specimen,
the greater latitude that Wilson
12. Wilson, Italian Maiolica,
while
is in A. M. Hind,
Early
Engraving:
with
Catalogue
Prints Described,
Complete
Reproduction
2 vols, in 7 (London:
Italian
not discounting
allows.
p. 70. The
engraving
A Critical
of All
the
1938-1948),
fig.
and Gherardi, Ceramiche
VII, pi. 886. Fiocco
umbre,
p. 96, illustrate a plate in the Kunstgewerbemuseum,
which they maintain
is derived
(E2465),
Cologne
pp.
from the same
engraving.
This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:27:42 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Brother
Leo
is present
in
33
from the plate, as is the case in a
illus
in private possession,
plate of about 1520-1550
trated by Wilson, Italian maiolica,
p. 71.1 may not be
from the engraving
alone in finding these derivations
II, p.
I, pp. 113-114;
(New York: 1999-2000),
Bellini's
St.
186. H. Wohl, "The Subject of Giovanni
in Mosaics
Francis in the Frick Collection,"
of Friend
ed.
ship: Studies in Art and History for Eve Borsook,
the latter but absent
vols.
Busti and
strained, given these and other differences.
Maestri
ceramisti,
Cocchi,
p. 16, illustrate a plate in
Comunale
delle Ceramiche
di Deruta on
the Museo
that it is God,
the figure of Brother Leo
in Busti
left (also
illustrated
which
regionale,
p. 241).
13. Fiocco
and Gherardi,
is present at the lower
and Cocchi,
Museo
Ceramiche
umbre, p. 96.
both the Los Angeles
14. My inclination
to ascribe
or even
and the Toledo piatti to the same workshop
cautious
the same hand has received
encouragement
O. Francisci
Osti (Florence:
1999), p. 190, points
not the Sun, who is being addressed.
into Art (London:
16. K. Clark, Landscape
1949),
of St. Fran
p. 24: "Here, at last, is a true illustration
cis' hymn to the sun"; A. R. Turner, The Vision of
in Renaissance
1966), p.
Landscape
Italy (Princeton:
62 n. 2: "The subject of the picture is 'Saint Francis
singing his canticle to the sun'"; Wohl, p. 190.
17. M. Meiss,
Frick
Collection
Bellini's
St. Francis
(Princeton:
1964);
A Note on the Frick
N.
'St.
"Bellini's
144, no. 1186 (2002):24-26;
Burlington Magazine
and Bellini's
Smart, "The speculum perfections
St. Francis," Apollo 97 (1973):470-476.
18. G. Robertson,
Giovanni
pp. 76-77.
This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:27:42 PM
All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Bellini
in the
Hammond,
from T. Wilson
risky.
and W. J.
15. R. J. Armstrong,
J. A. W. Hellmann,
2
Short, eds., Francis
of Assisi:
Early Documents,
Ass:
Giovanni
together
June 2005)
communication,
(personal
with a warning that, given the present state of
is
attribution to any particular workshop
knowledge,
out
Francis,'"
(Oxford:
A.
Frick
1968),