Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
…
12 pages
1 file
As the title suggests, in this paper we mount a defense for the presence of US Army Chaplains on combat patrols. We argue that the chaplain's twin roles as both Religious Leader and Advisor to the Commander provide a framework within which a meaningful "ministry of presence" may be embodied on an asymmetric battlefield.
Journal of Military Ethics, 2016
This thesis project is a generative study developing a paradigm of spiritual leadership to be utilized by senior Christian chaplains in preparing deliberate programs of spiritual enhancement for Christian chaplains who are anticipating accompanying U.S. Marines into a combat environment. Utilizing a paradigm of (1) knowledge of vocation, (2) assent, (3) trust expressed in prayer, and (4) community, this study lays the practical theological foundation to provide leadership to enhance the spirituality of clergy called to this unique ministry, identified in this study as Paracletic Military Ministry. Theological research centered on an understanding of vocation considering Jonah as a case study for vocation, a doctrinal review of vocation, and a Biblical word study on paraclesis to inform the specifics of the chaplain’s role in a combat setting. Literary research interacted with the literature of pastoral care, the social sciences, military leadership, and spiritual disciplines. Data collection for this study focused on interviewing Marines and chaplains who had served in combat to flesh out the vocational particulars of Paracletic Military Ministry. Research also gathered the chaplains’ experience in following spiritual disciplines while serving in a combat environment. Out of this research, principles for leading and preparing chaplains in Paracletic Military Ministry emerged that could be applied in retreats and workshops, as well as one-on-one mentoring by senior chaplains.
Security and Defense Studies Review Volume 9 , 2009
The term “strategic communications” refers to those tasks involving goal setting, situational knowledge, communication competence, and anxiety management. A means of persuading others to accept “one’s ideas, policies or courses of action,” the strategic communications discipline has come to be considered as “vitally important” to U.S. military policy as it is a way to convince “the nation’s citizens to support the policies of their leaders so that a national will is forged to accomplish national objectives.” In this context, strategic communication is an “essential element of national leadership” because, as one former Army Chief of Staff noted, “Armies don’t fight wars, nations fight wars.” In addition, strategic communications can be used to convince foreign audiences to support U.S. national strategic goals, such as combating terrorism or enhancing regional cooperation. Strategic communications is particularly valuable in light of the complaint in 2007 by Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates that the United States needed to better “communicate to the rest of the world what we are about as a society and as a culture.” This study is designed to shed light on a critical aspect of the chaplains’ work—their ministries as strategic communications platforms from which they both carry out a pastoral role and offer, as a valued member of the military inner circle, religious, moral, spiritual and ethical advice to leadership, both at the strategic and tactical levels. This article will examine the role of the American military chaplaincy as a strategic communications phenomenon that predates the concept itself, tracing the development of the armed forces’ quasi-independent religious corps that nonetheless has at times played a crucial role in the supporting the political orientation and strategic direction of the military. Although “strategic communications”—a buzzword emanating from the 1990s that gained even greater currency in the September 11, 2001 global “war of ideas”—might appear to be new, for centuries military chaplains have labored as strategic communicators in an effort to win support within the armed forces for the nation’s ideas, policies and courses of action. ...
International journal for the Study of the Christian Church, 2015
This article looks at the ambiguities in the role of the military chaplain from three points of view. The first considers the nature of the constituency within which the chaplain ministers, paying particular attention to the degree-or otherwise-of secularisation and the reasons for this. The second examines the role of the chaplain in relation to the two institutions which he or she serves (i.e. church and state) and the tensions that emerge as a result. These are articulated in terms of 'an angle of eschatological tension'. The third is concerned with 'the roles within the role'-that is the variety of tasks that make up the role of chaplaincy and the degree to which these are compatible with each other. The significance of theology in the resolution of the ensuing issues is set against diminishing societal resources in terms of religious literacy.
Journal of Church and State, 2015
The chaplaincy situation in the armed forces seems to be best regulated in the countries presented here at national level and at the same time, it seems to be the oldest one in comparison with the other sectors of the social sphere. One commonality across the countries presented here is that their armed forces dispose of military chaplaincy. Religious freedom for soldiers who have enlisted or are drafted into an organization that is not always capable of providing sufficient private sphere for such religious exercise is the main argument made in state-church regimes. In the military, religious freedom is mostly defined as a set of rights to practice one's religion including the right to access spiritual care. History After reading the national reports it is clear that the institution of military chaplaincy is a venerable one which has very deep roots placed in the history of each state and especially of each nation. In this way, a Romanian bishop said at the end of the 19 th century that we have a nation, because we had an Altar. In one form or another, depending on the national situation of each country, the military chaplaincy has existed in a recognizable form for more than 1600 years1. In fact, it is easy to observe this fact by reading the national reports where the army chaplaincy is founded very early in the national history of each European country. Actually the presence of the religious element extra murros ecclesiae, as chaplaincy in the armed forces is present all over Europe in different forms. The history of army chaplaincy goes back far in the history, and we can identify special army priests in 742 when the first German council2 took place in 1424, in Romania, in XVII century in Poland; the firstEnglishmilitary-oriented chaplains, for instance, were priests on board proto-naval vessels during the eighth century A.D. Land based chaplains appeared during the reign ofKing Edward I etc. As term, chaplaincy may not be found per seeven nowadays in some European societies, as is the case of the Balkan countries, but the spirit of this word is present in the institution of the military priest.
The Catholic Historical Review, 2009
Argument from the Chaplain's Role as Religious Leader
As it was previously alluded to, it should be no surprise that the most important reason for arguing for a chaplain presence on combat patrols is theological. The "be there" school of thought in the chaplain corps has prevailed in rhetoric if not always reality and "ministry of presence" has dominated as a philosophy of ministry even if it has become a tired buzzword. We align ourselves with the "ministry of presence"/ "be there" school but recognize the necessity of its clear and careful definition. For us, as Christian chaplains, this "ministry of presence" means bearing witness to the presence of Christ. In today's operational environment, there is no place where this is more necessary that on combat patrols.
Witness is rooted in the New Testament word µάρτυς and comes out of a juridical context. The word martyr is from derived it. Many early Christians were dragged into court to testify against their faith. Those who refused and remained faithful were "witnesses" for Christ ! 5 unto death. Before his ascension, Jesus commissions his disciples as "witnesses" of his death and resurrection (Luke 24:48; cf. Matthew 28:19ff). This is the task the apostles are "sent out" to accomplish, to witness to "the ends of the earth" (Acts 1:8). The Christian mission is to bear witness to the crucified and risen Christ.
Twentieth century Reformed theologian Karl Barth suggests that bearing witness to Christ is the Christian vocation. He puts it this way: "The Christian is called to be the accompanying and confirming sign of the living Word of God. It thus follows that he must indicate and attest this Word in the act of his whole existence." A helpful image of witness is 6 Matthias Grünewald's closed Isenheim Altarpiece (1512-1515; Unterlinden Museum, Colmar, France). Not incidentally, the work is one of Barth's favorite paintings and underscores many of his theological themes in the Church Dogmatics and elsewhere. In this image of the crucifixion Grünewald identifies Jesus' suffering with the lepers the monks cared for in the hospital of Saint Anthony's Monastery in Isenheim (the original location of the altarpiece, near Colmar). Jesus is given gangrenous green flesh and the cross is positioned off center so that his right arm is seemingly amputated when the altarpiece is opened. To the left of the cross stands John the Baptist, Bible in one hand, with a long finger extended, he points toward the crucified Christ.
Barth writes: "Can anyone point away from himself more impressively and completely? And can any one point to the thing indicated more impressively and realistically, than is done there?" 7 Thus, a witness, for Barth, is one who points away from herself and points toward the crucified "The special vocation of the Christian is to share in the living self-witness of the Crucified." 8 Part of that living self-witness of the Crucified is Christ's solidarity with our suffering, which is so well illustrated by Jesus' solidarity with the patients at Saint Anthony's in the Isenheim Altarpiece. God in Christ not only takes on our humanity, but also our sin on the cross. As Paul says: "He made him to be sin who knew no sin" for us (1 Corinthians 5:21). Christ joins in solidarity with our state (sin) and fate (he suffers our punishment of death and hell). Of course, 9 Christ not only stands in solidarity with us and on the cross takes upon himself all sin and evil, but also, and most importantly, he bears it away. The chaplain's witness of solidarity in suffering cannot save anyone, but the act of witnessing points toward the one who does. This witness is enacted through the unity of word and action in one's whole life.
Much caution is in order. A chaplain presence on combat patrols should not be viewed as a sign that "God is on our side." The chaplain should at all costs avoid even the perception of being a "holy warrior" in a crusade. Robert Lifton served as an Air Force psychiatrist in the Korean War and then worked with Vietnam veterans when they came home. In Home from the War he describes the ironic rage that service members reserved for "shrinks" and chaplains who had embraced the "counterfeit universe. ! 7 men put it, 'Whatever we were doing…murder…atrocities…God was always on our side.'" 10 Lifton goes on to say that "the chaplain presided over the hypocritical ritualization of Evil, and then sanctioned-even blessed-the routine, unritualized, and genuinely malignant evil." 11 Lifton's portrayal of the chaplain most assuredly exemplifies the ugly end to the quest to become necessary in the context of the military. To be necessary in the military is to be a combat or force "multiplier." In other words, the chaplain must be an asset to the project of war. What better asset can there be on the battlefield than a person who can enlist God to the side of the cause? To what higher authority can one appeal? So it is that commanders will ever seek to conscript the chaplain and her God to the cause of victory. Soldiers too will seek out connection to the divine in the midst of combat. Lifton puts it this way:
The men sought out chaplains and shrinks because of a spiritual-psychological crisis growing out of what they perceived to be irreconcilable demands in their situation. They sought either escape from absurd evil, or, at the very least, a measure of inner separation from it. Instead, spiritual-psychological authority was employed to seal off any such inner alternative. Chaplains and psychiatrists then formed unholy alliances not only with military command, but with the more corruptible elements of the soldier's individual psyche. We may then speak of the existence of a counterfeit universe, in which all pervasive, spiritually-reinforced inner corruption becomes the price of survival. 12 ! 8 doubt or, most significantly, penance. This is the heart of the lie that Lifton dubbed the "counterfeit universe:"
The veterans were trying to say that the only thing worse than being ordered by military authorities to participate in absurd evil is to have that evil rationalized and justified by guardians of the spirit. Chaplains and psychiatrists thus fulfill the function of helping men adjust to committing war crimes, while lending their spiritual authority to the overall project. 13
13
The very people who should have witnessed to a deeper truth in the face of the evil of war instead became prophets of a false god. On the contrary, the Christian chaplain bears witness to the crucified Christ. The Jesus we encounter in Holy Scripture refuses to be co-opted by a political cause, whether it is the cause of Peter and the 1st century Jews' desire to be free of the Roman occupation (Mark 8:33, cf. Matthew 16:23) or America's "War on Terror."
In sum, the chaplain as witness functions as a signpost, drawing on the witness of Holy Scripture and pointing like John the Baptist to the crucified Christ. In the Army this function as witness begins by simply "being there." Christian chaplains wear the sign of their Lord on their uniforms, a sign that points beyond them to the presence of the living Word of God. When they wear that sign (on their uniforms and in their lives) and as they share in every hardship of war they bear witness to Christ's presence and solidarity with suffering. In short, the chaplain bears witness to compassion and love. This especially includes the witness chaplains provide in the midst of death and trauma and the many physical, psychological, and spiritual wounds of war.
Field Manual 1-05: Religious Support concurs:
During the execution of decisive action, chaplains and chaplain assistants bring hope and strength to those who have been wounded and traumatized in body, mind, and spirit, by assisting in the healing process. Chaplains and chaplain assistants also provide religious support, pastoral care, comfort, and hope to the ! 9 dying. Through prayer and presence, the chaplain section or UMT provides the Soldier with courage and comfort in the face of death [emphasis added]. 14 In our current asymmetrical environment, "the execution of decisive action" most assuredly takes place out on patrol and more often than not it is on patrol that trauma and death are encountered. It should be clear that a chaplain can only witness to Christ's solidarity with such suffering by "being there."
Argument from the Chaplain's Role as Religious Advisor
In addition to being a religious leader, the chaplain also functions as a religious advisor to the command and staff of her unit on matters concerning religion, ethics, morality, and morale. 15
Without strong moral leadership and the adherence to ethical norms war naturally tends toward injustice and inhumanity. From the My Lai massacre to the recent atrocities of SSG Bales, war is replete with horrific and inhumane acts. As General Sherman opined, "War is Hell!" This is a truth that attends every armed conflict. Wars are waged on "the Other" and "the Enemy" all the while dehumanizing and depersonalizing this adversary. Whether depriving the enemy of humanity is an effective tactic or not, it does nothing to protect against the possibility of inhumane acts during war. The presence of a chaplain who emphasizes the humanity of both her soldiers and the enemy provides a needed corrective to the old axiom, "kill them all. Let God sort them out." Chaplains on combat patrols can give voice to religious, ethical, and moral concerns, militate against inhumane acts simply through their presence, and provide much U.S. Army,4. 14 Ibid., 3.
! 10 needed feedback to commanders on the ethics and morale of the soldiers. It is only by "being there" on patrol with their soldiers that such leadership and advisement can ever be provided.
For one author there were many opportunities while in combat to stand as a witness for both the humanity of the enemy and the ethical application of force. On a patrol to locate and recover a suspected cache of weapons and equipment neither weapons nor equipment were found. The intelligence provided had not led the patrol to a tunnel but had led them to a well for irrigating nearby fields. This particular company had been pinned down by the Taliban in their combat outpost for months with numerous casualties. Frustration and anger boiled just below the surface for many, including the company commander. Acting from anger and frustration the commander pulled out a grenade with the intent to throw it in the well. The chaplain on that patrol had a relationship of love and trust with that commander and was able to bring reason to bear. Needless destruction of property was avoided as well as the creation of another potential enemy. It is only by "being there" that such moral influence is exercised. It is only by "being there" that the chaplain is able to understand the ways that war tears at the souls of the soldiers involved.
Chaplains who embrace their identity as soldiers by participating in combat patrolswithout forgetting their role as clergy-gain legitimacy in the eyes of their troops, and build interpersonal bonds at all levels in the command. If chaplains are seen (or see themselves) as clergy pretending to be soldiers, they will not readily be accepted into the "band of brothers."
Equally as important, if chaplains are seen as soldiers pretending to be clergy, the moral imperative they represent in restricting inhumane acts is imperiled. On patrol the chaplain gains full knowledge of the hardships faced by their soldiers and sees an accurate picture of the ! 11 soldiers' morale under the stress of combat. Only with such knowledge can chaplains hope to accurately advise commanders.
Trade, Law and Development, Vol. 12, Issue 2, pp. 405-455, 2020
Restoration of Aquatic and Terrestrial Systems, 1988
Sustainability, 2015
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1999
Tetrahedron, 1995
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2015
FEBS Letters, 1989
Acta Universitaria, 2002
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013
International Journal of Endocrinology
Sustainable Forestry, 2023
Reviews on advanced materials and technologies, 2021