Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2017
Ospitiamo qui il progetto dell’ “Osservatorio sulle edizioni critiche” proposto da un gruppo di ricerca del Dipartimento di Studi letterari, filologici e linguistici dell'Universita degli Studi di Milano, composto da Alberto Cadioli, Paolo Chiesa, Stefano Martinelli Tempesta, William Spaggiari, Roberto Tagliani. Ora il gruppo di lavoro intorno al progetto, coinvolge anche Paolo Borsa, Virna Brigatti, Massimiliano Gaggero, Rossana Guglielmetti, Giulia Ravera. Il progetto e stato presentato in un seminario tenutosi a Milano il 13 settembre 2017 (si veda la Cronaca accolta in questo terzo numero di «Prassi Ecdotiche della Modernita Letteraria: https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/PEML/article/view/9272 ). Observatory on Critical Editions The project “An Observatory on critical editions” is promoted by the Department of Literature, Philolgy and Linguistics of Universita degli Studi di Milano. The research group is formed by Alberto Cadioli, Paolo Chiesa, Stefano Martinelli Tempesta, W...
2014
This essay examines what a critical edition of ancient classical texts is supposed to be and to contain and how a computer can be helpful in the different stages of the editor's work. After a survey on the best known digital tools which can be used for the preparation and publication of scholarly printed critical editions (CTE, LaTeX, TUSTEP), the essay gets on the specific topic of electronic editions. New philology emphasizes on the importance of reconstructing the history of all the manuscripts forming a tradition - and computers can indeed provide invaluable help towards this goal - but, even if this documental effort deserves approval, there is in it the risk of producing an enormous amount of documents and data that can paralyze the editor's work. The boundaries between a philological edition and an archive become confused, above all in case of a wide tradition made up of many manuscripts, and the truly philological task of establishing a hierarchy amongst witnesses is put aside. The true task of an editor of ancient classical works is to produce a text that is readable for its users and not to load on their shoulders the responsibility of choosing between variants. The concept of ‘mobile text’ and the way it is applied to modern and medieval texts cannot be used for ancient classical works, for which the principles of traditional ecdotics mantain their value, whether the final product is printed or electronic.
Koinonia, 2014
This essay examines what a critical edition of ancient classical texts is supposed to be and to contain and how a computer can be helpful in the different stages of the editor’s work. After a survey on the best known digital tools which can be used for the preparation and publication of scholarly printed critical editions (CTE, LaTeX, TUSTEP), the essay gets on the specific topic of electronic editions. New philology emphasizes on the importance of reconstructing the history of all the manuscripts forming a tradition – and computers can indeed provide invaluable help towards this goal – but, even if this documental effort deserves approval, there is in it the risk of producing an enormous amount of documents and data that can paralyze the editor’s work. The boundaries between a philological edition and an archive become confused, above all in case of a wide tradition made up of many manuscripts, and the truly philological task of establishing a hierarchy amongst witnesses is put aside. The true task of an editor of ancient classical works is to produce a text that is readable for its users and not to load on their shoulders the responsibility of choosing between variants. The concept of ‘mobile text’ and the way it is applied to modern and medieval texts cannot be used for ancient classical works, for which the principles of traditional ecdotics mantain their value, whether the final product is printed or electronic.
«Studi di Filologia Italiana», Bollettino Annuale dell'Accademia della Crusca, vol. LXXIV (2016), Firenze, Le Lettere, pp. 215-319., 2016
pubblicato in "L'Italia dialettale", numero speciale allegato al vol. LXXIII (2015), pp. 49-74.
2016
Il problema di approntare edizioni che siano leggibili da parte di un pubblico ampio e al contempo corrette sul piano testuale, sfruttando edizioni critiche e studi specialistici, e sempre piu al centro delle riflessioni degli editori, divisi fra la necessita di realizzare apparati complessi (ma poco accessibili all’utente medio) e la volonta di un’ampia divulgazione. Occorre che gli editori mettano in atto una politica editoriale differenziata, al fine di fornire al lettore comune commenti e introduzioni che diano conto, oltre che delle competenze che l’autore del testo presupponeva per i lettori del suo tempo (cosa invero complessa da stabilire con certezza), anche del farsi del testo e della sua complessita storica, al fine di stimolarlo a un approfondimento anche sul piano del dato testuale.
Tesis de Maestría en Arqueología, Programa de Estudios Andinos, PUCP, 2017
Pierwszy rozbiór Polski w świetle najnowszych badań, red. J. Bajer, J. Kordel, 2023
Centennial Romanian Lyrical Voices, Bilingual Gendered Counterparts/, 2018
Heritage & Society, 2019
Program Studi Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam STID Mohammad Natsir, 2009
European Journal of Combinatorics, 2014
Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks, 2019
Environmental Pollution, 2018
2016
The Journal of The Textile Institute, 2017
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2018